Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 17, 2024. It is now read-only.

Tor Support #472

Open
zero77 opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 13 comments
Open

Tor Support #472

zero77 opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 13 comments

Comments

@zero77
Copy link

zero77 commented Jun 29, 2016

Can you add the option of Tor support so all traffic that is sent between the bots and C&C is sent through Tor. As this will add extra security and get rid of the need for VPNs and DDNS like no-ip.

@0xE232FE
Copy link

Its already working! You can redirect all Sockets over TOR even QuasarRAT! There is no Limit in Tor!

Pleas Read the Tor References about Hidden Services! There you find how to do that!

You never be forced to use DDNS!

@superguard
Copy link

how to direct traffic from the client through the tor?

@kkar
Copy link

kkar commented Dec 26, 2016

That would be interesting. If you could give us some more information it would be appreciated. Thank you!

@EnricoVogt
Copy link

EnricoVogt commented Jan 13, 2017

  1. Install Tor on Client-Side
  2. Install Privoxy
  3. Tell Privoxy to route all traffic through TOR. TOR is Listening on 9050
  4. Let the Client connect to 127.0.0.1:8118 (8118 Default Privoxy Port)

@kkar
Copy link

kkar commented Jan 27, 2017

It won't work just like that. Where is the onion-hostname part?

@life-coder
Copy link

I'm gonna do it as followed:

_handle(Client) will be a ProxySocket instead of a socket. If Settings.TOR = true then it will download tor and run it(background) then the Socket will connect trough a random socks port to the hidden service(control server) For the control server I'm thinking of using a ephemeral hidden service? On request generate a tor key and on every start(if autolisten is turned on) it will auto start the service again. But then you would need to save the private key to maybe the settings file, which is unsafe, maybe some sort of encryption before writing to a file? Need a suggestion on that

@kkar
Copy link

kkar commented Mar 19, 2017

@matteke-games you don't need to do that. Let us set up the hidden service manually, it's not a problem at all. The main "problem" (feature i'd say) is the connection itself. I've found a guy who compiled TOR in to a single executable. Do you want me to search my bookmarks and find the link, to help you avoid all of these useless tor dependencies?

@abdullah2993
Copy link
Contributor

Bundling tor with the client is not really a good option besides you have to add "proper" socks support to the client so....

@abdullah2993
Copy link
Contributor

Also instead of a single statically compiled binary of tor you can have the client download the tor expert bundle and extract it but still need socks5 support on the client...

@life-coder
Copy link

@kkar I want to provide ease of use for everyone as not everyone can setup a hidden service and @abdullah2993 I'm going to use a modified version of TorSharp for this

@kkar
Copy link

kkar commented Aug 14, 2017

Hello, is there any update on this subject? Thanks again for this awesome project.

@SkepticTiqer
Copy link

Can someone update when this is done, if ever?

@TheDarkMythos
Copy link

any news ? tor connection would be awesome!!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants