Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): Update Rust crate minijinja to v2.7.0 #680

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 28, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
minijinja dependencies minor 2.6.0 -> 2.7.0

Release Notes

mitsuhiko/minijinja (minijinja)

v2.7.0

Compare Source

  • Removed string interning. #​675
  • loop.nextitem is now a lazy operation. This prevents issues when
    iterating over one-shot iterators combined with {% break %} and
    it now ensures that the iterator is not running "one item ahead". #​677
  • Fixed an issue that caused loop aliasing not to be supported for
    recursive loops. #​678
  • CLI moved from serde_yml to serde_yaml. #​684
  • Improved undefined error reporting. Undefined values will now in most
    cases point to exactly where the error happened. #​686
  • Allow newer notify dependency versions (up to 8.x) for the autoreload
    crate. #​688

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@pando85 pando85 merged commit e86a210 into master Feb 9, 2025
11 checks passed
@pando85 pando85 deleted the renovate/minijinja-2.x-lockfile branch February 9, 2025 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant