-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Amphenol USB-C Port Replacement Request for JLCPCB Service #95
Comments
You can outsource the parts and have them sent directly to jlcpcb. The amphenol i got from a source in the US and sent to China took about 3 weeks. Changing the USB has been asked in the past but is the best to work with the AIOC from what i remembered reading. There was a specific reason. Search the past ticket's |
I understand your point, it wouldn't be feasible for Germany as the device would quickly cost over $40-50. Amphenol is also hard to source here, and shipping to China simply wouldn't be economically worthwhile. But Simon will probably know that. I hope we can offer a second variant instead. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with KiCad to make the change myself. |
I tried kicad to add my name to the silkscreen so i knew if anyone i sold an AIOC and asked for help or send it back i knew it was one of mine but kicad kept saying that I could only make the changes on the file that was made in AutoCAD before it was converted to whatever format it was at the moment. |
Thank you for your feedback. Perhaps Simon can do this directly, it should actually be very quick if you are familiar with KiCad. However, I have decided to use EasyEDA, another tool is too much for me. |
There is a PR #68 that solves this. |
I want to keep the design free of "chinese" parts (that are jlcpcb or lcsc specific) in case anyone wants to manufacturer this in a local shop that uses a "regular" distributor. |
That was a very important tip, I can understand that you don't want to install ‘China’ parts here. I found the service ‘Global Sourcing Parts’, so I was able to order the required quantity. Now let's wait and see, thanks for your help. |
That footprint is also more available from a "regular" distributor, since there are at least three parts with the same (or very similar) footprint. (Last two taken from https://github.com/jenschr/USB-C-Connectors) 10155435-00011LF: https://static6.arrow.com/aropdfconversion/8b7fcc09a36618b85ca7fe3ff684b20254f1d749/10155435.pdf CU3216SASDLR010: non stocked, so not counted |
Thanks. It's really a lot of work to find alternative sources for a given footprint (that's also one of the reasons for not using something else). The first two parts are widely available on the western market. I might have a look at the alternative amphenol part. |
Usually sorting by price would show the parts with the most common footprints. Using mouser, on the first page of the search results I found a few more: Most similar: Less similar, has different spacing: |
See, it's not that easy. 217179-0001 and USB4215-03-A are not compatible mechanically. They have slightly different spacing on the shell pads. I think I am going to switch to |
Ah yes, thanks for noticing it! I have updated the comment to reflect that. |
V1.2 is coming along well and will be using an easier to source USB port. I will thus close this issue for now. |
Could you please change the USB-C port? The Amphenol 12401832E40 is very difficult to obtain. To use the JLCPCB service, it would be very helpful if this could be changed.
Currently, the following USB-C port is available: https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/USB-Connectors_SHOU-HAN-TYPE-C-24P-QT_C2681555.html
I would be very grateful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: