Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

not all repos for an organization are shown #235

Open
raboof opened this issue Jan 14, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

not all repos for an organization are shown #235

raboof opened this issue Jan 14, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@raboof
Copy link

raboof commented Jan 14, 2015

could only be an issue with private repos, not sure. Some private repos are visible though...

@raboof
Copy link
Author

raboof commented Jan 14, 2015

When I jump to a project via a link this works fine, but it doesnt show up when enumerating all projects for a project

@elbeezi
Copy link

elbeezi commented May 26, 2015

+1

@alorma
Copy link

alorma commented May 26, 2015

Github recently changed how private repos are shown in the apps.

To make it appear, first check your settings -> applications, and check if the application is allowed to access that organization

@raboof
Copy link
Author

raboof commented May 26, 2015

@alorma I'm not sure what you mean - on https://github.com/settings/applications gh4a doesn't show up as an application, and access is not granted on a per-application basis.

@maniac103
Copy link
Collaborator

Right, Octodroid uses the authorizations API to create the OAuth tokens instead of the full OAuth flow.

@alorma
Copy link

alorma commented May 26, 2015

Yes @raboof, in that page, if you select the application (octodroid, or gh4a), you can grant acces

@alorma
Copy link

alorma commented May 26, 2015

@maniac103 with auth api, users don't need to grant access to the applications?

@maniac103
Copy link
Collaborator

@alorma Correct. This is the API we use: https://developer.github.com/v3/oauth_authorizations/#create-a-new-authorization
The web flow is a bit cumbersome from a UX perspective IMHO, and the setup for different build variants to store the client secret etc. also creates more work ;)

@Tunous Tunous added the bug label Oct 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants