Code generated by managed language runtimes tend to have checks that are required for safety but never fail in practice. In such cases, it is profitable to make the non-failing case cheaper even if it makes the failing case significantly more expensive. This asymmetry can be exploited by folding such safety checks into operations that can be made to fault reliably if the check would have failed, and recovering from such a fault by using a signal handler.
For example, Java requires null checks on objects before they are read
from or written to. If the object is null
then a
NullPointerException
has to be thrown, interrupting normal
execution. In practice, however, dereferencing a null
pointer is
extremely rare in well-behaved Java programs, and typically the null
check can be folded into a nearby memory operation that operates on
the same memory location.
Information about implicit checks generated by LLVM are put in a
special "fault map" section. On Darwin this section is named
__llvm_faultmaps
.
The format of this section is
Header {
uint8 : Fault Map Version (current version is 1)
uint8 : Reserved (expected to be 0)
uint16 : Reserved (expected to be 0)
}
uint32 : NumFunctions
FunctionInfo[NumFunctions] {
uint64 : FunctionAddress
uint32 : NumFaultingPCs
uint32 : Reserved (expected to be 0)
FunctionFaultInfo[NumFaultingPCs] {
uint32 : FaultKind = FaultMaps::FaultingLoad (only legal value currently)
uint32 : FaultingPCOffset
uint32 : HandlerPCOffset
}
}
The ImplicitNullChecks
pass transforms explicit control flow for
checking if a pointer is null
, like:
%ptr = call i32* @get_ptr()
%ptr_is_null = icmp i32* %ptr, null
br i1 %ptr_is_null, label %is_null, label %not_null, !make.implicit !0
not_null:
%t = load i32, i32* %ptr
br label %do_something_with_t
is_null:
call void @HFC()
unreachable
!0 = !{}
to control flow implicit in the instruction loading or storing through the pointer being null checked:
%ptr = call i32* @get_ptr()
%t = load i32, i32* %ptr ;; handler-pc = label %is_null
br label %do_something_with_t
is_null:
call void @HFC()
unreachable
This transform happens at the MachineInstr
level, not the LLVM IR
level (so the above example is only representative, not literal). The
ImplicitNullChecks
pass runs during codegen, if
-enable-implicit-null-checks
is passed to llc
.
The ImplicitNullChecks
pass adds entries to the
__llvm_faultmaps
section described above as needed.
Making null checks implicit is an aggressive optimization, and it can be a net performance pessimization if too many memory operations end up faulting because of it. A language runtime typically needs to ensure that only a negligible number of implicit null checks actually fault once the application has reached a steady state. A standard way of doing this is by healing failed implicit null checks into explicit null checks via code patching or recompilation. It follows that there are two requirements an explicit null check needs to satisfy for it to be profitable to convert it to an implicit null check:
- The case where the pointer is actually null (i.e. the "failing" case) is extremely rare.
- The failing path heals the implicit null check into an explicit null check so that the application does not repeatedly page fault.
The frontend is expected to mark branches that satisfy (1) and (2)
using a !make.implicit
metadata node (the actual content of the
metadata node is ignored). Only branches that are marked with
!make.implicit
metadata are considered as candidates for
conversion into implicit null checks.
(Note that while we could deal with (1) using profiling data, dealing with (2) requires some information not present in branch profiles.)