Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What should be the name of konstrukt namespace? #22

Open
Kubo2 opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

What should be the name of konstrukt namespace? #22

Kubo2 opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@Kubo2
Copy link
Contributor

Kubo2 commented Aug 31, 2014

Do you plan to pack konstrukt into its own namespace instead of using k_ prefix in class names? If so, what should be the name of its global namespace?


And by the way, what version should it relate to?

@troelskn
Copy link
Owner

I have personally not been using Konstrukt for over 3 years now, so very little work is going into developing it further. I believe there are still some people using it, mainly for legacy apps, so there is the occasional fix now and then, but Konstrukt will probably never get ported to having full namespace support. If you're starting on new projects today, I would suggest that you base it on a framework with some more momentum.

@Kubo2
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kubo2 commented Sep 4, 2014

Thanks for your response. I wanted (and probably still want) to use Konstrukt as a core of my project's second major version. Because this project has been written proceduraly by one of my collaborators for first time, it can be great new start using Konstrukt. Later I will completely rewrite it for our needs but I can keep a branch for improving the original Konstrukt. :-)

@lsolesen
Copy link
Collaborator

lsolesen commented Apr 3, 2016

@Kubo2 Did you use Konstrukt - or did you go another route?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants