Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to increase processing speed for phosphoproteomics data in DIA-NN? #1278

Open
demhibou opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@demhibou
Copy link

Dear Vadim,

First, thanks for making a great software! We are generating DIA phosphoproteomics data using a Bruker timsTOF HT on human cells infected with viruses. We have generated an in-silico spectral library in DIA-NN with the attached settings (see attached library generation settings image) and used this to search our .d files (see attached settings used for the search image, which were slightly refined). Our .d files are often around 3GB each.

The spectral library generation took about 12 hours, which is OK for us as we only have to do this once per project. However, searching our data is taking >12 hours per sample, even when we load in this pre-created spectral library.

We are wondering if you have any advice for how we can refine our settings to greatly enhance the speed of our phosphoproteomics searches.

Thank you!

Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 12 14 38 PM Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 12 15 47 PM
@vdemichev
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

We have generated an in-silico spectral library in DIA-NN with the attached settings

Please change precursor charge range to 2-3 as recommended here https://github.com/vdemichev/DiaNN?tab=readme-ov-file#ptms-and-peptidoforms

However, searching our data is taking >12 hours per sample

Can you please share the logs for both the library generation and the analysis?
Please note that it's OK to use the ultra-fast mode for phospho on timsTOFs.

Best,
Vadim

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants