You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@wmondy has taken a number of Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) images of the same specimen.
It would be good to try to duplicate (as much as possible) those views with the microCT data using VisIt volume rendering.
There are several things to try to get right...
Color map. SEM images are all gray scale.
Camera parameters (position, direction of view, focal point, depth of field, etc.)
Resolution
SEM images are quite high resolution.
There are resolution annotations (over 100 pixels in length) to indicate a length and its absolute spatial distance.
In example here, the annotation is 137 pixels indicating 200 micrometers. This means each pixel is ~1.46 micrometers. That is about 6.85x better than the microCT data at 10 micrometers per pixel. In the same image, below, I have reduced the resolution by a factor of 6.85...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@wmondy has taken a number of Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) images of the same specimen.
It would be good to try to duplicate (as much as possible) those views with the microCT data using VisIt volume rendering.
There are several things to try to get right...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: