-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
/
0055.html
57 lines (57 loc) · 2.43 KB
/
0055.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
<!-- received="Thu Jul 3 10:13:29 1997 MDT" -->
<!-- sent="Thu, 3 Jul 1997 10:08:32 -0400" -->
<!-- name="Abraham Moses Genen" -->
<!-- email="[email protected]" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Hooray for the 10th Amendment ???" -->
<!-- id="[email protected]" -->
<!-- inreplyto="Hooray for the 10th Amendment ???" -->
<title>extropians: Re: Hooray for the 10th Amendment ???</title>
<h1>Re: Hooray for the 10th Amendment ???</h1>
Abraham Moses Genen (<i>[email protected]</i>)<br>
<i>Thu, 3 Jul 1997 10:08:32 -0400</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#55">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#55">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#55">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#55">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0056.html">Max More: "PHYS: Storing information in photons"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0054.html">Kennita Watson: "Re: mindfulness (AKA: Dueling Rhetoricians)"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<hr>
<!-- body="start" -->
Dear Michael and other fellow Extropians,<br>
<p>
This dialogue, although quite enjoyable, seems to be going off on tangents<br>
of the hypothetical extremes. This is not that bad, nor is it that good.<br>
<p>
I suspect, however, that some of us -- myself included -- might be getting<br>
too emotionally involved and loosing our objectivity on the issue of gun<br>
control by becoming involved in somewhat questionable exegesis.<br>
<p>
Possibly, we should further consider what is in the best interest of the<br>
continuing evolution of humankind and its cultures. We should consider in<br>
this context the need for greater altruism in an enhanced humanistic<br>
environment. <br>
<p>
The political context of our dialogue as well should be strongly<br>
considered if we are to believe that we are all capable of care and<br>
concern for our fellow humans and respectful of their their right to seek<br>
individual freedoms without the imposition of their personal constraints<br>
and and other emotional burdens on other members of society.<br>
<p>
Quo Vadis?<br>
<p>
A.M. Genen<br>
<p>
<br>
<!-- body="end" -->
<hr>
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0056.html">Max More: "PHYS: Storing information in photons"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0054.html">Kennita Watson: "Re: mindfulness (AKA: Dueling Rhetoricians)"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>