You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While working with XProc test suite again, I am baffled by the
expected results of test "psvi-required-001.xml" over and over again.
Clearly an XProc implementation not supporting PSVI like Calumet or
mine cannot pass this test. But running the test it always
looks like I am producing wrong results on a supported step.
In my opinion reading the results of this test would be very much
clearer, if p:declare-step in the pipeline would use
attribute "psvi-required" so not supporting implementations can fail
with err:XD0022.
Would you agree or is there a reason to have the test in the current
version I did not get?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From private email:
While working with XProc test suite again, I am baffled by the
expected results of test "psvi-required-001.xml" over and over again.
Clearly an XProc implementation not supporting PSVI like Calumet or
mine cannot pass this test. But running the test it always
looks like I am producing wrong results on a supported step.
In my opinion reading the results of this test would be very much
clearer, if p:declare-step in the pipeline would use
attribute "psvi-required" so not supporting implementations can fail
with err:XD0022.
Would you agree or is there a reason to have the test in the current
version I did not get?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: