You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally reported by: Nathan Goldbaum (Bitbucket: ngoldbaum, GitHub: ngoldbaum)
Right now it's very difficult to come up with a transfer function that looks good on all scales. For example, in a zoom animation the transfer function needs to be very carefully chosen so it looks good throughout the zoom.
One possible way to fix this is to make the colormap periodic so that it 'wraps' around at the high end of the colormap.
This should allow scale-invariant zooms and time series visualizations with no foreknowledge of the simulation's dynamic range.
This might be an unpopular opinion, but I am -1 on this. I think I understand the objections -- and my data crosses 24 OOM in density, so I also worry about this -- but I'm not sure that a wraparound tf is the solution to that problem.
Originally reported by: Nathan Goldbaum (Bitbucket: ngoldbaum, GitHub: ngoldbaum)
Right now it's very difficult to come up with a transfer function that looks good on all scales. For example, in a zoom animation the transfer function needs to be very carefully chosen so it looks good throughout the zoom.
One possible way to fix this is to make the colormap periodic so that it 'wraps' around at the high end of the colormap.
This should allow scale-invariant zooms and time series visualizations with no foreknowledge of the simulation's dynamic range.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: