| title | category |
|---|---|
TiDB TPC-H 50G Performance Test Report V2.1 |
benchmark |
This test aims to compare the performances of TiDB 2.0 and TiDB 2.1 in the OLAP scenario.
Note:
Different test environments might lead to different test results.
System information:
| Machine IP | Operation system | Kernel version | File system type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0.1.4 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
| 10.0.1.5 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
| 10.0.1.6 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
| 10.0.1.7 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
| 10.0.1.8 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
| 10.0.1.9 | CentOS 7.5.1804 64bit | 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64 | ext4 |
Hardware information:
| Type | 10.0.1.4 | 10.0.1.5, 10.0.1.6, 10.0.1.7, 10.0.1.8, 10.0.1.9 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 16 vCPUs, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz | 8 vCPUs, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz |
| Memory | 110G | 55G |
| Disk | 221G SSD | 111G SSD |
| Network card | 10 Gigabit Ethernet, 10000Mb/s | 10 Gigabit Ethernet, 10000Mb/s |
| Machine IP | Deployment Instance |
|---|---|
| 10.0.1.5 | TiKV * 1 |
| 10.0.1.6 | TiKV * 1 |
| 10.0.1.7 | TiKV * 1 |
| 10.0.1.8 | TiKV * 1 |
| 10.0.1.9 | TiKV * 1 |
| 10.0.1.4 | PD * 1 |
| 10.0.1.4 | TiDB * 1 |
TiDB 2.0:
| Component | Version | Commit Hash |
|---|---|---|
| TiDB | v2.0.7 | 29ec059cb3b7d14b6f52c2f219f94a89570162bc |
| TiKV | v2.0.7 | d0b8cd7c7f62f06e7ef456837bd32a47da1ca4cd |
| PD | v2.0.5 | b64716707b7279a4ae822be767085ff17b5f3fea |
TiDB 2.1:
| Component | Version | Commit Hash |
|---|---|---|
| TiDB | v2.1.0-rc.2 | 16864f95b47f859ed6104555ccff0387abdc2429 |
| TiKV | v2.1.0-rc.2 | 8458ce53ebbd434c48baac6373fe0f0a43a54005 |
| PD | v2.1.0-rc.2 | 55db505e8f35e8ab4e00efd202beb27a8ecc40fb |
| Query ID | TiDB 2.0 | TiDB 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 121.550595999s | 91.4755480289s |
| 2 | 53.0638680458s | 23.1186130047s |
| 3 | 75.7236940861s | 61.790802002s |
| 4 | 30.2647120953s | 26.3483440876s |
| 6 | 51.4850790501s | 34.6432199478s |
| 7 | 216.787364006s | 94.9856910706s |
| 8 | 188.717588902s | 181.852752209s |
| 9 | 546.438174009s | 414.462754965s |
| 10 | 109.978317022s | 37.0369961262s |
| 11 | 42.9398438931s | 37.6951580048s |
| 12 | 60.455039978s | 40.2236878872s |
| 13 | 230.278712988s | 70.2887151241s |
| 14 | 61.2673521042s | 35.8372960091s |
| 16 | 30.2539310455s | 18.5897550583s |
| 17 | 3200.70173788s | 263.095014811s |
| 18 | 1035.59847498s | 296.360667944s |
| 19 | 54.3732938766s | 40.4523630142s |
| 20 | 105.094577074s | 53.2429068089s |
| 21 | 389.883709908s | 361.034544945s |
| 22 | 64.0494630337s | 65.7153418064s |
It should be noted that:
- In the diagram above, the red bars represent the query results of Release 2.1 and the blue bars represent the query results of Release 2.0. The y-axis represents the processing time of queries in seconds, the shorter the faster.
- The result of Query 15 is not displayed because VIEW is currently not supported in either TiDB 2.1 or 2.0.
- The result of Query 5 is not displayed because no result is returned during a long period of time caused by the Join Order issue.