-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about 52 expression param #104
Comments
I would also like to have this information |
Have you found those parameters? I'm also looking for them |
I did not get them but I used their fit3d and passed in all the 3D vertices instead of the 68 landmarks, optimized for the ID and exp for 5 iterations and extracted them. It doesn't reproduce shape and expression accurately but doesn't deviate too much either. Hope it helps! . I wish they would share the exact ID and exp params too since these small errors in each shape would result in larger average error for comparison metric |
Thanks! I'll try to fit with the 3D vertices |
Hi @prathebaselva, which model did you use to fit the 3D vertices? I tried 1.6 but it seems the number of vertices between the model (26278) and the mesh (26317) do not match. I noticed that you also replied in that issue. Did you manage to find a solution? |
I used their vertex 16 to 10 or 10 to 16 npy file to do the conversion. do not remember exactly which one i used. |
turned out it should be 10 to 16. Thank you! |
I wanna get the 52 expression coefficients of each expression for each ID。then we can get mesh_vertices through
mesh_vertices = self.core_tensor.dot(id).dot(exp).reshape((-1, 3))
I would be very grateful if you could give me some advice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: