This README explains how to add new Archiver implementations.
Step 1: Create a new package for your implementation
Create a new directory in the archiver
folder. The structure should look like the following:
./common/archiver
- filestore/ -- Filestore implementation
- provider/
- provider.go -- Provider of archiver instances
- yourImplementation/
- historyArchiver.go -- HistoryArchiver implementation
- historyArchiver_test.go -- Unit tests for HistoryArchiver
- visibilityArchiver.go -- VisibilityArchiver implementations
- visibilityArchiver_test.go -- Unit tests for VisibilityArchiver
Step 2: Implement the HistoryArchiver interface
type HistoryArchiver interface {
// Archive is used to archive a workflow history. When the context expires the method should stop trying to archive.
// Implementors are free to archive however they want, including implementing retries of sub-operations. The URI defines
// the resource that histories should be archived into. The implementor gets to determine how to interpret the URI.
// The Archive method may or may not be automatically retried by the caller. The ArchiveOptions are used
// to interact with these retries including giving the implementor the ability to cancel retries and record progress
// between retry attempts.
// This method will be invoked after a workflow passes its retention period.
Archive(context.Context, URI, *ArchiveHistoryRequest, ...ArchiveOption) error
// Get is used to access an archived history. When context expires method should stop trying to fetch history.
// The URI identifies the resource from which history should be accessed and it is up to the implementor to interpret this URI.
// This method should thrift errors - see filestore as an example.
Get(context.Context, URI, *GetHistoryRequest) (*GetHistoryResponse, error)
// ValidateURI is used to define what a valid URI for an implementation is.
ValidateURI(URI) error
}
Step 3: Implement the VisibilityArchiver interface
type VisibilityArchiver interface {
// Archive is used to archive one workflow visibility record.
// Check the Archive() method of the HistoryArchiver interface in Step 2 for parameters' meaning and requirements.
// The only difference is that the ArchiveOption parameter won't include an option for recording process.
// Please make sure your implementation is lossless. If any in-memory batching mechanism is used, then those batched records will be lost during server restarts.
// This method will be invoked when workflow closes. Note that because of conflict resolution, it is possible for a workflow to through the closing process multiple times, which means that this method can be invoked more than once after a workflow closes.
Archive(context.Context, URI, *ArchiveVisibilityRequest, ...ArchiveOption) error
// Query is used to retrieve archived visibility records.
// Check the Get() method of the HistoryArchiver interface in Step 2 for parameters' meaning and requirements.
// The request includes a string field called query, which describes what kind of visibility records should be returned. For example, it can be some SQL-like syntax query string.
// Your implementation is responsible for parsing and validating the query, and also returning all visibility records that match the query.
// Currently the maximum context timeout passed into the method is 3 minutes, so it's ok if this method takes a long time to run.
Query(context.Context, URI, *QueryVisibilityRequest) (*QueryVisibilityResponse, error)
// ValidateURI is used to define what a valid URI for an implementation is.
ValidateURI(URI) error
}
Step 4: Update provider to provide access to your implementation
Modify the ./provider/provider.go
file so that the ArchiverProvider
knows how to create an instance of your archiver.
Also, add configs for you archiver to static yaml config files and modify the HistoryArchiverProvider
and VisibilityArchiverProvider
struct in the ../common/service/config.go
accordingly.
If my Archive method can automatically be retried by caller how can I record and access progress between retries?
ArchiverOptions is used to handle this. The following shows and example:
func (a *Archiver) Archive(
ctx context.Context,
URI string,
request *ArchiveRequest,
opts ...ArchiveOption,
) error {
featureCatalog := GetFeatureCatalog(opts...) // this function is defined in options.go
var progress progress
// Check if the feature for recording progress is enabled.
if featureCatalog.ProgressManager != nil {
if err := featureCatalog.ProgressManager.LoadProgress(ctx, &prevProgress); err != nil {
// log some error message and return error if needed.
}
}
// Your archiver implementation...
// Record current progress
if featureCatalog.ProgressManager != nil {
if err := featureCatalog.ProgressManager.RecordProgress(ctx, progress); err != nil {
// log some error message and return error if needed.
}
}
}
If my Archive method encounters an error which is non-retryable how do I indicate that the caller should not retry?
func (a *Archiver) Archive(
ctx context.Context,
URI string,
request *ArchiveRequest,
opts ...ArchiveOption,
) error {
featureCatalog := GetFeatureCatalog(opts...) // this function is defined in options.go
err := youArchiverImpl()
if nonRetryableErr(err) {
if featureCatalog.NonRetriableError != nil {
return featureCatalog.NonRetriableError() // when the caller gets this error type back it will not retry anymore.
}
}
}
How does my history archiver implementation read history?
The archiver
package provides a utility class called HistoryIterator
which is a wrapper of HistoryManager
.
Its usage is simpler than the HistoryManager
given in the BootstrapContainer
,
so archiver implementations can choose to use it when reading workflow histories.
See the historyIterator.go
file for more details.
Sample usage can be found in the filestore historyArchiver implementation.
Should my archiver define all its own error types?
Each archiver is free to define and return any errors it wants. However many common errors which
exist between archivers are already defined in constants.go
.
Is there a generic query syntax for visibility archiver?
Currently no. But this is something we plan to do in the future. As for now, try to make your syntax similar to the one used by our advanced list workflow API.