Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
ofproto: Use OF1.4+ "importance" as part of eviction criteria.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The "importance" field is considered before flow timeout because I figure
that if you set the importance, you think it's important.

Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Saloni Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
blp and salonijain12 committed Jul 3, 2015
1 parent 7e9383c commit f70b94d
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 102 additions and 22 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions NEWS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Post-v2.4.0
- OpenFlow:
* Group chaining (where one OpenFlow group triggers another) is
now supported.
* OpenFlow 1.4+ "importance" is now considered for flow eviction.
- Support for matching and generating options with Geneve tunnels.
- Support Multicast Listener Discovery (MLDv1 and MLDv2).

Expand Down
42 changes: 24 additions & 18 deletions ofproto/ofproto.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ struct eviction_group {

static bool choose_rule_to_evict(struct oftable *table, struct rule **rulep)
OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
static uint32_t rule_eviction_priority(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct rule *)
OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);;
static uint64_t rule_eviction_priority(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct rule *)
OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
static void eviction_group_add_rule(struct rule *)
OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
static void eviction_group_remove_rule(struct rule *)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -7384,23 +7384,21 @@ eviction_group_find(struct oftable *table, uint32_t id)
}

/* Returns an eviction priority for 'rule'. The return value should be
* interpreted so that higher priorities make a rule more attractive candidates
* for eviction.
* Called only if have a timeout. */
static uint32_t
* interpreted so that higher priorities make a rule a more attractive
* candidate for eviction. */
static uint64_t
rule_eviction_priority(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct rule *rule)
OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
/* Calculate absolute time when this flow will expire. If it will never
* expire, then return 0 to make it unevictable. */
long long int expiration = LLONG_MAX;
long long int modified;
uint32_t expiration_offset;

/* 'modified' needs protection even when we hold 'ofproto_mutex'. */
ovs_mutex_lock(&rule->mutex);
modified = rule->modified;
ovs_mutex_unlock(&rule->mutex);

if (rule->hard_timeout) {
/* 'modified' needs protection even when we hold 'ofproto_mutex'. */
ovs_mutex_lock(&rule->mutex);
long long int modified = rule->modified;
ovs_mutex_unlock(&rule->mutex);

expiration = modified + rule->hard_timeout * 1000;
}
if (rule->idle_timeout) {
Expand All @@ -7412,7 +7410,6 @@ rule_eviction_priority(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct rule *rule)
idle_expiration = used + rule->idle_timeout * 1000;
expiration = MIN(expiration, idle_expiration);
}

if (expiration == LLONG_MAX) {
return 0;
}
Expand All @@ -7422,10 +7419,19 @@ rule_eviction_priority(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct rule *rule)
*
* This should work OK for program runs that last UINT32_MAX seconds or
* less. Therefore, please restart OVS at least once every 136 years. */
expiration_offset = (expiration >> 10) - (time_boot_msec() >> 10);
uint32_t expiration_ofs = (expiration >> 10) - (time_boot_msec() >> 10);

/* Invert the expiration offset because we're using a max-heap. */
return UINT32_MAX - expiration_offset;
/* Combine expiration time with OpenFlow "importance" to form a single
* priority value. We want flows with relatively low "importance" to be
* evicted before even considering expiration time, so put "importance" in
* the most significant bits and expiration time in the least significant
* bits.
*
* Small 'priority' should be evicted before those with large 'priority'.
* The caller expects the opposite convention (a large return value being
* more attractive for eviction) so we invert it before returning. */
uint64_t priority = ((uint64_t) rule->importance << 32) + expiration_ofs;
return UINT64_MAX - priority;
}

/* Adds 'rule' to an appropriate eviction group for its oftable's
Expand Down
62 changes: 62 additions & 0 deletions tests/ofproto.at
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1864,6 +1864,68 @@ OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.2):
OVS_VSWITCHD_STOP
AT_CLEANUP

AT_SETUP([ofproto - eviction using importance upon table overflow (OpenFlow 1.4)])
OVS_VSWITCHD_START
# Configure a maximum of 4 flows.
AT_CHECK(
[ovs-vsctl \
-- --id=@t0 create Flow_Table name=evict flow-limit=4 overflow-policy=evict \
-- set bridge br0 flow_tables:0=@t0 \
| ${PERL} $srcdir/uuidfilt.pl],
[0], [<0>
])
# Add 4 flows.
for in_port in 4 3 2 1; do
ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 add-flow br0 importance=$((in_port + 30)),priority=$((in_port + 5)),hard_timeout=$((in_port + 500)),actions=drop
done
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 dump-flows br0 | ofctl_strip | sort], [0], [dnl
hard_timeout=501, importance=31, priority=6 actions=drop
hard_timeout=502, importance=32, priority=7 actions=drop
hard_timeout=503, importance=33, priority=8 actions=drop
hard_timeout=504, importance=34, priority=9 actions=drop
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.4):
])
# Adding another flow will cause the one with lowest importance to be evicted.
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 add-flow br0 hard_timeout=505,importance=35,priority=10,in_port=2,actions=drop])
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 dump-flows br0 | ofctl_strip | sort], [0], [dnl
hard_timeout=502, importance=32, priority=7 actions=drop
hard_timeout=503, importance=33, priority=8 actions=drop
hard_timeout=504, importance=34, priority=9 actions=drop
hard_timeout=505, importance=35, priority=10,in_port=2 actions=drop
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.4):
])
# Disable the Eviction configuration.
AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl set Flow_Table evict overflow-policy=refuse])
# Adding another flow will cause the system to give error for FULL TABLE.
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 add-flow br0 hard_timeout=506,importance=36,priority=11,actions=drop],[1], [], [stderr])
AT_CHECK([head -n 1 stderr | ofctl_strip], [0],
[OFPT_ERROR (OF1.4): OFPFMFC_TABLE_FULL
])
#Dump flows. It should show only the old values
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 dump-flows br0 | ofctl_strip | sort], [0], [dnl
hard_timeout=502, importance=32, priority=7 actions=drop
hard_timeout=503, importance=33, priority=8 actions=drop
hard_timeout=504, importance=34, priority=9 actions=drop
hard_timeout=505, importance=35, priority=10,in_port=2 actions=drop
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.4):
])
# mod-flow that would modify a flow will be done successfully.
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 mod-flows br0 in_port=2,actions=NORMAL])
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl -O Openflow14 dump-flows br0 | ofctl_strip | sort], [0], [dnl
hard_timeout=502, importance=32, priority=7 actions=drop
hard_timeout=503, importance=33, priority=8 actions=drop
hard_timeout=504, importance=34, priority=9 actions=drop
hard_timeout=505, importance=35, priority=10,in_port=2 actions=NORMAL
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.4):
])
# Also a mod-flow that would add a flow will be refused.
AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl mod-flows br0 in_port=5,actions=drop], [1], [], [stderr])
AT_CHECK([head -n 1 stderr | ofctl_strip], [0],
[OFPT_ERROR: OFPFMFC_TABLE_FULL
])
OVS_VSWITCHD_STOP
AT_CLEANUP

AT_SETUP([ofproto - eviction upon table overflow, with fairness (OpenFlow 1.0)])
OVS_VSWITCHD_START
# Configure a maximum of 4 flows.
Expand Down
19 changes: 15 additions & 4 deletions vswitchd/vswitch.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3082,15 +3082,18 @@

<p>
When a flow must be evicted due to overflow, the flow to evict is
chosen through an approximation of the following algorithm:
chosen through an approximation of the following algorithm. This
algorithm is used regardless of how eviction was enabled:
</p>

<ol>
<li>
Divide the flows in the table into groups based on the values of the
specified fields or subfields, so that all of the flows in a given
group have the same values for those fields. If a flow does not
specify a given field, that field's value is treated as 0.
fields or subfields specified in the <ref column="groups"/> column,
so that all of the flows in a given group have the same values for
those fields. If a flow does not specify a given field, that field's
value is treated as 0. If <ref column="groups"/> is empty, then all
of the flows in the flow table are treated as a single group.
</li>

<li>
Expand All @@ -3100,6 +3103,14 @@
those groups.
</li>

<li>
If the flows under consideration have different importance values,
eliminate from consideration any flows except those with the lowest
importance. (``Importance,'' a 16-bit integer value attached to each
flow, was introduced in OpenFlow 1.4. Flows inserted with older
versions of OpenFlow always have an importance of 0.)
</li>

<li>
Among the flows under consideration, choose the flow that expires
soonest for eviction.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f70b94d

Please sign in to comment.