Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove options-general.php from duplicated view experiment #41529

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

okmttdhr
Copy link
Member

@okmttdhr okmttdhr commented Feb 4, 2025

Proposed changes:

The change that should have been made prior to #41497 merge.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Go to '..'

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the update/revert-duplicated-view-options-general branch.

    • For jetpack-mu-wpcom changes, also add define( 'JETPACK_MU_WPCOM_LOAD_VIA_BETA_PLUGIN', true ); to your wp-config.php file.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin update/revert-duplicated-view-options-general
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • 🔴 Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • 🔴 Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Feb 4, 2025
@okmttdhr okmttdhr self-assigned this Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Code Coverage Summary

No summary data is avilable for parent commit b9ca37b, cannot calculate coverage changes. 😴

If that commit is a feature branch rather than a trunk commit, this is expected. Otherwise, you might try re-running the Tests / Publish coverage data job on this PR once the corresponding job on the trunk commit has succeeded.

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

@okmttdhr okmttdhr merged commit 5f6e410 into trunk Feb 4, 2025
62 of 63 checks passed
@okmttdhr okmttdhr deleted the update/revert-duplicated-view-options-general branch February 4, 2025 02:27
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Feb 4, 2025
@simison simison changed the title Remove options-general.phph from duplicated view experiment Remove options-general.php from duplicated view experiment Feb 4, 2025
@jeherve jeherve added the [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it label Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[mu wpcom Feature] Wpcom Admin Interface [Package] Jetpack mu wpcom WordPress.com Features [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants