Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[INTPLAT-445] DDSaaS: Temporal Cloud: Crawler Integration without Assets #19140

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bparmar-crest
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

PR includes skeleton of Temporal Cloud integration without any assets like dashboards, image, README content, etc.

Motivation

This is beta release of crawler integration and is intended for internal testing before going live. As per @nathanmadams's suggestion, we are planning to raise separate PR with assets and all necessary information later.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@bparmar-crest bparmar-crest marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 13:48
@bparmar-crest bparmar-crest requested review from a team as code owners November 27, 2024 13:48
Copy link
Contributor

@estherk15 estherk15 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No docs review needed, documentation is not filled out in this iteration.

@torosmassa torosmassa changed the title DDSaaS: Temporal Cloud: Crawler Integration without Assets [INTPLAT-445] DDSaaS: Temporal Cloud: Crawler Integration without Assets Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants