Welcome to the plyfile
Python module, which provides a simple facility
for reading and writing ASCII and binary PLY files.
The PLY format is documented elsewhere.
- python2 >= 2.7 or python3
- numpy >= 1.8
Note: numpy
1.9 before version 1.9.2 has a bug that breaks byte
swapping by manipulating the byte_order
field of a PlyData
instance.
As a workaround, you can manually byte-swap your arrays using el.data = el.data.byteswap().newbyteorder()
in addition to changing the
byte_order
attribute.
- setuptools (for installation via setup.py)
- tox (for test suite)
- py.test and py (for test suite)
Quick way:
pip install plyfile
Or clone the repository and run from the project root:
python setup.py install
Or just copy plyfile.py
into your GPL-compatible project.
Preferred (more comprehensive; requires tox and setuptools):
tox -v
Alternate (requires py.test and py):
py.test test -v
Both deserialization and serialization of PLY file data is done through
PlyData
and PlyElement
instances.
>>> from plyfile import PlyData, PlyElement
For the code examples that follow, assume the file tet.ply
contains
the following text:
ply
format ascii 1.0
comment single tetrahedron with colored faces
element vertex 4
comment tetrahedron vertices
property float x
property float y
property float z
element face 4
property list uchar int vertex_indices
property uchar red
property uchar green
property uchar blue
end_header
0 0 0
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0
3 0 1 2 255 255 255
3 0 2 3 255 0 0
3 0 1 3 0 255 0
3 1 2 3 0 0 255
(This file is available under the examples
directory.)
>>> plydata = PlyData.read('tet.ply')
or
>>> with open('tet.ply', 'rb') as f:
... plydata = PlyData.read(f)
The static method PlyData.read
returns a PlyData
instance, which is
plyfile
's representation of the data in a PLY file. A PlyData
instance has an attribute elements
, which is a list of PlyElement
instances, each of which has a data
attribute which is a numpy
structured array containing the numerical data. PLY file elements map
onto numpy
structured arrays in a pretty obvious way. For a list
property in an element, the corresponding numpy
field type
is object
, with the members being numpy
arrays (see the
vertex_indices
example below).
Concretely:
>>> plydata.elements[0].name
'vertex'
>>> plydata.elements[0].data[0]
(0.0, 0.0, 0.0)
>>> plydata.elements[0].data['x']
array([ 0., 0., 1., 1.], dtype=float32)
>>> plydata['face'].data['vertex_indices'][0]
array([0, 1, 2], dtype=int32)
For convenience, elements and properties can be looked up by name:
>>> plydata['vertex']['x']
array([ 0., 0., 1., 1.], dtype=float32)
and elements can be indexed directly without explicitly going through
the data
attribute:
>>> plydata['vertex'][0]
(0.0, 0.0, 0.0)
The above expression is equivalent to plydata['vertex'].data[0]
.
PlyElement
instances also contain metadata:
>>> plydata.elements[0].properties
(PlyProperty('x', 'float'), PlyProperty('y', 'float'),
PlyProperty('z', 'float'))
>>> plydata.elements[0].count
4
PlyProperty
and PlyListProperty
instances are used internally as a
convenient intermediate representation of PLY element properties that
can easily be serialized to a PLY header (using str
) or converted to
numpy
-compatible type descriptions (via the dtype
method). It's not
extremely common to manipulate them directly, but if needed, the
property metadata of an element can be accessed as a tuple via the
properties
attribute (as illustrated above) or looked up by name:
>>> plydata.elements[0].ply_property('x')
PlyProperty('x', 'float')
Many (but not necessarily all) types of malformed input files will raise
PlyParseError
when PlyData.read
is called. The string value of the
PlyParseError
instance (as well as attributes element
, row
, and
prop
) provides additional context for the error if applicable.
The first step is to get your data into numpy
structured arrays. Note
that there are some restrictions: generally speaking, if you know the
types of properties a PLY file element can contain, you can easily
deduce the restrictions. For example, PLY files don't contain 64-bit
integer or complex data, so these aren't allowed.
For convenience, non-scalar fields are allowed; they will be
serialized as list properties. For example, when constructing a "face"
element, if all the faces are triangles (a common occurrence), it's okay
to have a "vertex_indices" field of type 'i4'
and shape (3,)
instead of type object
and shape ()
. However, if the serialized PLY
file is read back in using plyfile
, the "vertex_indices" property will
be represented as an object
-typed field, each of whose values is an
array of type 'i4'
and length 3. The reason is simply that the PLY
format provides no way to find out that each "vertex_indices" field has
length 3 without actually reading all the data, so plyfile
has to
assume that this is a variable-length property. However, see below (and
examples/plot.py
) for an easy way to recover a two-dimensional array
from a list property.
For example, if we wanted to create the "vertex" and "face" PLY elements
of the tet.ply
data directly as numpy
arrays for the purpose of
serialization, we could do (as in test/test.py
):
>>> vertex = numpy.array([(0, 0, 0),
... (0, 1, 1),
... (1, 0, 1),
... (1, 1, 0)],
... dtype=[('x', 'f4'), ('y', 'f4'),
... ('z', 'f4')])
>>> face = numpy.array([([0, 1, 2], 255, 255, 255),
... ([0, 2, 3], 255, 0, 0),
... ([0, 1, 3], 0, 255, 0),
... ([1, 2, 3], 0, 0, 255)],
... dtype=[('vertex_indices', 'i4', (3,)),
... ('red', 'u1'), ('green', 'u1'),
... ('blue', 'u1')])
Once you have suitably structured array, the static method
PlyElement.describe
can then be used to create the necessary
PlyElement
instances:
>>> el = PlyElement.describe(some_array, 'some_name')
or
>>> el = PlyElement.describe(some_array, 'some_name',
... comments=['comment1',
... 'comment2'])
Note that there's no need to create PlyProperty
instances explicitly.
This is all done behind the scenes by examining some_array.dtype.descr
.
One slight hiccup here is that variable-length fields in a numpy
array
(i.e., our representation of PLY list properties)
must have a type of object
, so the types of the list length and values
in the serialized PLY file can't be obtained from the array's dtype
attribute alone. For simplicity and predictability, the length
defaults to 8-bit unsigned integer, and the value defaults to 32-bit
signed integer, which covers the majority of use cases. Exceptions must
be stated explicitly:
>>> el = PlyElement.describe(some_array, 'some_name',
... val_dtypes={'some_property': 'f8'},
... len_dtypes={'some_property': 'u4'})
Now you can instantiate PlyData
and serialize:
>>> PlyData([el]).write('some_binary.ply')
>>> PlyData([el], text=True).write('some_ascii.ply')
>>> PlyData([el],
... byte_order='>').write('some_big_endian_binary.ply')
In the last example, the byte order of the output was forced to big-endian, independently of the machine's native byte order.
Header comments are supported:
>>> ply = PlyData([el], comments=['header comment'])
>>> ply.comments
['header comment']
As of version 0.3, "obj_info" comments are supported as well:
>>> ply = PlyData([el], obj_info=['obj_info1', 'obj_info2'])
>>> ply.obj_info
['obj_info1', 'obj_info2']
When written, they will be placed after regular comments after the "format" line.
Comments can have leading whitespace, but trailing whitespace may be stripped and should not be relied upon. Comments may not contain embedded newlines.
The PLY format provides no way to assert that all the data for a given
list property is of the same length, yet this is a relatively common
occurrence. For example, all the "vertex_indices" data on a "face"
element will have length three for a triangular mesh. In such cases,
it's usually much more convenient to have the data in a two-dimensional
array, as opposed to a one-dimensional array of type object
. Here's a
pretty easy way to obtain a two dimensional array, assuming we know the
row length in advance:
>>> plydata = PlyData.read('tet.ply')
>>> tri_data = plydata['face'].data['vertex_indices']
>>> triangles = numpy.vstack(tri_data)
A plausible code pattern is to read a PLY file into a PlyData
instance, perform some operations on it, possibly modifying data and
metadata in place, and write the result to a new file. This pattern is
partially supported. As of version 0.4, the following in-place
mutations are supported:
- Modifying numerical array data only.
- Assigning directly to a
PlyData
instance'selements
. - Switching format by changing the
text
andbyte_order
attributes of aPlyData
instance. This will switch betweenascii
,binary_little_endian
, andbinary_big_endian
PLY formats. - Modifying a
PlyData
instance'scomments
andobj_info
, and modifying aPlyElement
instance'scomments
. - Assigning to an element's
data
. Note that the property metadata inproperties
is not touched by this, so for every property in theproperties
list of thePlyElement
instance, thedata
array must have a field with the same name (but possibly different type, and possibly in different order). The array can have additional fields as well, but they won't be output when writing the element to a PLY file. The properties in the output file will appear as they are in theproperties
list. If an array field has a different type than the correspondingPlyProperty
instance, then it will be cast when writing. - Assigning directly to an element's
properties
. Note that thedata
array is not touched, and the previous note regarding the relationship betweenproperties
anddata
still applies: the field names ofdata
must be a subset of the property names inproperties
, but they can be in a different order and specify different types. - Changing a
PlyProperty
orPlyListProperty
instance'sval_dtype
or aPlyListProperty
instance'slen_dtype
, which will perform casting when writing.
Modifying the name
of a PlyElement
, PlyProperty
, or
PlyListProperty
instance is not supported and will raise an error. To
rename a property of a PlyElement
instance, you can remove the
property from properties
, rename the field in data
, and re-add the
property to properties
with the new name by creating a new
PlyProperty
or PlyListProperty
instance:
>>> from plyfile import PlyProperty, PlyListProperty
>>> face = plydata['face']
>>> face.properties = ()
>>> face.data.dtype.names = ['idx', 'r', 'g', 'b']
>>> face.properties = (PlyListProperty('idx', 'uchar', 'int'),
... PlyProperty('r', 'uchar'),
... PlyProperty('g', 'uchar'),
... PlyProperty('b', 'uchar'))
Note that it is always safe to create a new PlyElement
or PlyData
instance instead of modifying one in place, and this is the recommended
style:
>>> # Recommended:
>>> plydata = PlyData([plydata['face'], plydata['vertex']],
text=False, byte_order='<')
>>> # Also supported:
>>> plydata.elements = [plydata['face'], plydata['vertex']]
>>> plydata.text = False
>>> plydata.byte_order = '<'
>>> plydata.comments = []
>>> plydata.obj_info = []
Objects created by this library don't claim ownership of the other
objects they refer to, which has implications for both styles (creating
new instances and modifying in place). For example, a single
PlyElement
instance can be contained by multiple PlyData
instances,
but modifying that instance will then affect all of those containing
PlyData
instances.
At the time that I wrote this, I didn't know of any simple and
self-contained Python PLY file module using numpy
as its data
representation medium. Considering the increasing prevalence of Python
as a tool for scientific programming with NumPy as the lingua franca
for numerical data, such a module seemed desirable; hence, plyfile
was
born.
I opted to use existing Python and NumPy constructs whenever they
matched the data. Thus, the elements
attribute of a PlyData
instance is simply a list
of PlyElement
instances, and the data
attribute of a PlyElement
instance is a numpy
array, and a list
property field of a PLY element datum is referred to in the data
attribute by a type of object
with the value being another numpy
array, etc. In the last case, this is certainly not the most-efficient
in-memory representation of the data, since it contains a lot of
indirection. However, it is arguably the most obvious and natural
unless NumPy adds explicit support for "ragged" arrays in its type
system. The design goal was to represent data in a form familiar to
users of numpy
.
When the two were at odds, I decided to favor simplicity over power or
user-friendliness. Thus, list property types in PlyElement.describe
always default to the same, rather than, say, being obtained by looking
at an array element. (Which element? What if the array has length
zero? Whatever default we could choose in that case could lead to
subtle edge-case bugs if the user isn't vigilant.) Also, all input and
output is done in "one shot": all the arrays must be created up front
rather than being processed in a streaming fashion. (That said, I have
nothing against streamability, and I considered it at one point. I
decided against it for now in order to have a consistent and
maintainable interface at least for the first usable version.)
There doesn't seem to be a single complete and consistent description of the PLY format. Even the "authoritative" Ply.txt by Greg Turk has some issues.
Where can comments appear in the header? It appears that in all the
"official" examples, all comments immediately follow the "format" line,
but the language of the document neither places any such restrictions
nor explicitly allows comments to be placed anywhere else. Thus, it
isn't clear whether comments can appear anywhere in the header or must
immediately follow the "format" line. At least one popular reader of
PLY files chokes on comments before the "format" line. plyfile
accepts comments anywhere in the header in input but only places them in
a few limited places in output, namely immediately after "format" and
"element" lines.
Another ambiguity is names: what strings are allowed as PLY element and
property names? plyfile
accepts as input any name that doesn't
contain spaces, but this is surely too generous. This may not be such
a big deal, though: although names are theoretically arbitrary, in
practice, the majority of PLY element and property names probably come
from a small finite set ("face", "x", "nx", "green", etc.).
A more serious problem is that the PLY format specification appears to be inconsistent regarding the syntax of property definitions. In some examples, it uses the syntax
property {type} {name}
and in others,
property {name} {type}
plyfile
only supports the former, which appears to be standard de
facto.
The specification explicitly states that lines in the header must end with carriage returns, but this rule doesn't seem to be followed by anyone, including the C-language PLY implementation by Greg Turk, the author of the format. Here, we stick to common practice and output Unix-style line endings (with no carriage returns) but accept any line ending style in input files.
Examples beyond the scope of this document and the tests are in the
examples
directory.
Author: Darsh Ranjan
This software is released under the terms of the GNU General Public
License, version 3. See the file COPYING
for details.