Pragmatic functional programming
Expression aims to be a solid, type-safe, pragmatic, and high performance library for frictionless and practical functional programming in Python 3.9+.
By pragmatic, we mean that the goal of the library is to use simple abstractions to enable you to do practical and productive functional programming in Python (instead of being a Monad tutorial).
Python is a multi-paradigm programming language that also supports functional programming constructs such as functions, higher-order functions, lambdas, and in many ways favors composition over inheritance.
Better Python with F#
Expression tries to make a better Python by providing several functional features inspired by F#. This serves several purposes:
- Enable functional programming in a Pythonic way, i.e., make sure we are not over-abstracting things. Expression will not require purely functional programming as would a language like Haskell.
- Everything you learn with Expression can also be used with F#. Learn F# by starting in a programming language they already know. Perhaps get inspired to also try out F# by itself.
- Make it easier for F# developers to use Python when needed, and re-use many of the concepts and abstractions they already know and love.
Expression will enable you to work with Python using many of the same programming concepts and abstractions. This enables concepts such as Railway oriented programming (ROP) for better and predictable error handling. Pipelining for workflows, computational expressions, etc.
Expressions evaluate to a value. Statements do something.
F# is a functional programming language for .NET that is succinct (concise, readable, and type-safe) and kind of Pythonic. F# is in many ways very similar to Python, but F# can also do a lot of things better than Python:
- Strongly typed, if it compiles it usually works making refactoring much safer. You can trust the type-system. With mypy or Pylance you often wonder who is right and who is wrong.
- Type inference, the compiler deduces types during compilation
- Expression based language
You can install the latest expression
from PyPI by running pip
(or
pip3
). Note that expression
only works for Python 3.9+.
> pip3 install expression
- Industrial strength library for functional programming in Python.
- The resulting code should look and feel like Python (PEP-8). We want to make a better Python, not some obscure DSL or academic Monad tutorial.
- Provide pipelining and pipe friendly methods. Compose all the things!
- Dot-chaining on objects as an alternative syntax to pipes.
- Lower the cognitive load on the programmer by:
- Avoid currying, not supported in Python by default and not a well known concept by Python programmers.
- Avoid operator (
|
,>>
, etc) overloading, this usually confuses more than it helps. - Avoid recursion. Recursion is not normally used in Python and any use of it should be hidden within the SDK.
- Provide type-hints for all functions and methods.
- Support PEP 634 and structural pattern matching.
- Code must pass strict static type checking by pylance. Pylance is awesome, use it!
- Pydantic friendly data types. Use Expression types as part of your Pydantic data model and (de)serialize to/from JSON.
Expression will never provide you with all the features of F# and .NET. We are providing a few of the features we think are useful, and will add more on-demand as we go along.
- Pipelining - for creating workflows.
- Composition - for composing and creating new operators.
- Fluent or Functional syntax, i.e., dot chain or pipeline operators.
- Pattern Matching - an alternative flow control to
if-elif-else
. - Error Handling - Several error handling types.
- Option - for optional stuff and better
None
handling. - Result - for better error handling and enables railway-oriented programming in Python.
- Try - a simpler result type that pins the error to an Exception.
- Option - for optional stuff and better
- Collections - immutable collections.
- TypedArray - a generic array type that abstracts the details of
bytearray
,array.array
andlist
modules. - Sequence - a better itertools and fully compatible with Python iterables.
- Block - a frozen and immutable list type.
- Map - a frozen and immutable dictionary type.
- AsyncSeq - Asynchronous iterables.
- AsyncObservable - Asynchronous observables. Provided separately by aioreactive.
- TypedArray - a generic array type that abstracts the details of
- Data Modelling - sum and product types
- TaggedUnion - A tagged (discriminated) union type.
- Parser Combinators - A recursive decent string parser combinator library.
- Effects: - lightweight computational expressions for Python. This
is amazing stuff.
- option - an optional world for working with optional values.
- result - an error handling world for working with result values.
- Mailbox Processor: for lock free programming using the Actor model.
- Cancellation Token: for cancellation of asynchronous (and synchronous) workflows.
- Disposable: For resource management.
Expression provides a pipe
function similar to |>
in F#. We don't want to
overload any Python operators, e.g., |
so pipe
is a plain old function taking
N-arguments, and will let you pipe a value through any number of functions.
from expression import pipe
v = 1
fn = lambda x: x + 1
gn = lambda x: x * 2
assert pipe(v, fn, gn) == gn(fn(v))
Expression objects (e.g., Some
, Seq
, Result
) also have a pipe
method, so you can dot chain pipelines
directly on the object:
from expression import Some
v = Some(1)
fn = lambda x: x.map(lambda y: y + 1)
gn = lambda x: x.map(lambda y: y * 2)
assert v.pipe(fn, gn) == gn(fn(v))
So for example with sequences you may create sequence transforming pipelines:
from expression.collections import seq, Seq
xs = Seq.of(9, 10, 11)
ys = xs.pipe(
seq.map(lambda x: x * 10),
seq.filter(lambda x: x > 100),
seq.fold(lambda s, x: s + x, 0)
)
assert ys == 110
Functions may even be composed directly into custom operators:
from expression import compose
from expression.collections import seq, Seq
xs = Seq.of(9, 10, 11)
custom = compose(
seq.map(lambda x: x * 10),
seq.filter(lambda x: x > 100),
seq.fold(lambda s, x: s + x, 0)
)
ys = custom(xs)
assert ys == 110
Expression can be used both with a fluent or functional syntax (or both.)
The fluent syntax uses methods and is very compact. But it might get you into trouble for large pipelines since it's not a natural way of adding line breaks.
from expression.collections import Seq
xs = Seq.of(1, 2, 3)
ys = xs.map(lambda x: x * 100).filter(lambda x: x > 100).fold(lambda s, x: s + x, 0)
Note that fluent syntax is probably the better choice if you use mypy for type checking since mypy may have problems inferring types through larger pipelines.
The functional syntax is a bit more verbose but you can easily add new operations on new lines. The functional syntax is great to use together with pylance/pyright.
from expression import pipe
from expression.collections import seq, Seq
xs = Seq.of(1, 2, 3)
ys = pipe(xs,
seq.map(lambda x: x * 100),
seq.filter(lambda x: x > 100),
seq.fold(lambda s, x: s + x, 0),
)
Both fluent and functional syntax may be mixed and even pipe can be used fluently.
from expression.collections import seq, Seq
xs = Seq.of(1, 2, 3).pipe(seq.map(...))
The Option
type is used when a function or method cannot produce a meaningful
output for a given input.
An option value may have a value of a given type, i.e., Some(value)
, or it might
not have any meaningful value, i.e., Nothing
.
from expression import Some, Nothing, Option
def keep_positive(a: int) -> Option[int]:
if a > 0:
return Some(a)
return Nothing
from expression import Option, Ok
def exists(x : Option[int]) -> bool:
for value in x.match(Ok):
return True
return False
Effects in Expression is implemented as specially decorated coroutines
(enhanced generators) using
yield
, yield from
and return
to consume or generate optional values:
from expression import effect, Some
@effect.option[int]()
def fn():
x = yield 42
y = yield from Some(43)
return x + y
xs = fn()
This enables "railway oriented
programming", e.g., if one part of the
function yields from Nothing
then the function is side-tracked
(short-circuit) and the following statements will never be executed. The end
result of the expression will be Nothing
. Thus results from such an option
decorated function can either be Ok(value)
or Error(error_value)
.
from expression import effect, Some, Nothing
@effect.option[int]()
def fn():
x = yield from Nothing # or a function returning Nothing
# -- The rest of the function will never be executed --
y = yield from Some(43)
return x + y
xs = fn()
assert xs is Nothing
For more information about options:
The Result[T, TError]
type lets you write error-tolerant code that can be
composed. A Result works similar to Option
, but lets you define the value used
for errors, e.g., an exception type or similar. This is great when you want to
know why some operation failed (not just Nothing
). This type serves the same
purpose of an Either
type where Left
is used for the error condition and Right
for a success value.
from expression import effect, Ok, Result
@effect.result[int, Exception]()
def fn():
x = yield from Ok(42)
y = yield from Ok(10)
return x + y
xs = fn()
assert isinstance(xs, Result)
A simplified type called Try
is also available. It's a result type that is
pinned to Exception
i.e., Result[TSource, Exception]
.
Sequences is a thin wrapper on top of iterables and contains operations for working with Python iterables. Iterables are immutable by design, and perfectly suited for functional programming.
import functools
from expression import pipe
from expression.collections import seq
# Normal python way. Nested functions are hard to read since you need to
# start reading from the end of the expression.
xs = range(100)
ys = functools.reduce(lambda s, x: s + x, filter(lambda x: x > 100, map(lambda x: x * 10, xs)), 0)
# With Expression, you pipe the result, so it flows from one operator to the next:
zs = pipe(
xs,
seq.map(lambda x: x * 10),
seq.filter(lambda x: x > 100),
seq.fold(lambda s, x: s + x, 0),
)
assert ys == zs
Tagged Unions (aka discriminated unions) may look similar to normal Python Unions. But
they are different in that the operands in a
type union (A | B)
are both types, while the cases in a tagged union type U = A | B
are both constructors for the type U and are not types themselves. One consequence is
that tagged unions can be nested in a way union types might not.
In Expression you make a tagged union by defining your type as a sub-class of
TaggedUnion
with the appropriate generic types that this union represent for
each case. Then you define static or class-method constructors for creating each of the
tagged union cases.
from dataclasses import dataclass
from expression import TaggedUnion, tag
@dataclass
class Rectangle:
width: float
length: float
@dataclass
class Circle:
radius: float
class Shape(TaggedUnion):
RECTANGLE = tag(Rectangle)
CIRCLE = tag(Circle)
@staticmethod
def rectangle(width: float, length: float) -> Shape:
return Shape(Shape.RECTANGLE, Rectangle(width, length))
@staticmethod
def circle(radius: float) -> Shape:
return Shape(Shape.CIRCLE, Circle(radius))
Now you may pattern match the shape to get back the actual value:
from expression import match
shape = Shape.Rectangle(2.3, 3.3)
with match(shape) as case:
if case(Circle):
assert False
for rect in case(Shape.RECTANGLE(width=2.3)):
assert rect.length == 3.3
if case.default():
assert False
In F# modules are capitalized, in Python they are lowercase
(PEP-8).
E.g in F# Option
is both a module (OptionModule
internally) and a
type. In Python the module is option
and the type is capitalized i.e
Option
.
Thus in Expression you use option
as the module to access module functions
such as option.map
and the name Option
for the type itself.
>>> from expression import Option, option
>>> Option
<class 'expression.core.option.Option'>
>>> option
<module 'expression.core.option' from '/Users/dbrattli/Developer/Github/Expression/expression/core/option.py'>
A list of common problems and how you may solve it:
Remember that everything is just a function, so you can easily implement a custom function yourself and use it with Expression. If you think the function is also usable for others, then please open a PR to include it with Expression.
A collection of resources that were used as reference and inspiration for creating this library.
- F# (http://fsharp.org)
- Get Started with F# (https://aka.ms/fsharphome)
- F# as a Better Python - Phillip Carter - NDC Oslo 2020 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QnbV6CAWXc)
- OSlash (https://github.com/dbrattli/OSlash)
- RxPY (https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxPY)
- PEP 8 -- Style Guide for Python Code (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/)
- PEP 342 -- Coroutines via Enhanced Generators (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0342/)
- PEP 380 -- Syntax for Delegating to a Subgenerator (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0380)
- PEP 479 -- Change StopIteration handling inside generators (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0479/)
- PEP 634 -- Structural Pattern Matching (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0634/)
- Thunks, Trampolines and Continuation Passing (https://jtauber.com/blog/2008/03/30/thunks,_trampolines_and_continuation_passing/)
- Tail Recursion Elimination (http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/04/tail-recursion-elimination.html)
- Final Words on Tail Calls (http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/04/final-words-on-tail-calls.html)
- Python is the Haskell You Never Knew You Had: Tail Call Optimization (https://sagnibak.github.io/blog/python-is-haskell-tail-recursion/)
You are very welcome to contribute with suggestions or PRs 😍 It is nice if you can try to align the code and naming with F# modules, functions, and documentation if possible. But submit a PR even if you should feel unsure.
Code, doc-strings, and comments should also follow the Google Python Style Guide.
Code checks are done using
To run code checks on changed files every time you commit, install the pre-commit hooks by running:
> pre-commit install
This project follows https://www.contributor-covenant.org, see our Code of Conduct.
MIT, see LICENSE.