Make AppLayout demos compatible with addons demo #125
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the dependency management of the project and update various components to align with new routing and naming conventions. A new demo structure is introduced, showcasing the App Layout component within an iframe, aligning with the objectives to improve compatibility with the AddonsDemo project. The modifications streamline navigation and enhance the overall organization of the codebase. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java (1)
49-49: Update references to the old route value.The route value has been updated to
"applayout-full", but there are still occurrences of the old route value"applayout"in the codebase. Please update these references to ensure consistent routing.
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java: Line with@Route(value = "applayout/applayout-demo", layout = AppLayoutDemoView.class)src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java: Line with@Route("applayout")Analysis chain
Verify usage of the updated route value.
The route value has been changed to
"applayout-full". Ensure that all references to this route in the codebase are updated to avoid broken links.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the updated route value `applayout-full`. # Test: Search for references to the route value. Expect: Only occurrences of the new route value. rg --type java -A 5 $'@Route(value = "applayout-full"'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the updated route value `applayout-full`. # Test: Search for references to the route value. Expect: Only occurrences of the new route value. rg --type java -A 5 '@Route(value = "applayout-full"'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the updated route value `applayout-full`. # Test: Search for references to the route value. Expect: Only occurrences of the new route value. rg --type java -A 5 '@Route\(value = "applayout-full"'Length of output: 752
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any remaining references to the old route value `applayout`. # Test: Search for references to the old route value. Expect: No occurrences of the old route value. rg --type java 'applayout'Length of output: 6474
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- pom.xml (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleInternalView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/DemoView.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/ExtendingAppLayoutDemo.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleInternalView.java
Additional comments not posted (12)
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java (1)
1-24: Ensure correct routing and iframe setup.The
AppLayoutDemoclass correctly sets up an iframe to display the full AppLayout demo. The use of@Routeand@PageTitleannotations is appropriate for setting up the demo view. Ensure that the URL/applayout-fullcorrectly points to the intended content.src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/ExtendingAppLayoutDemo.java (1)
1-24: Ensure correct routing and iframe setup.The
ExtendingAppLayoutDemoclass correctly sets up an iframe to display the extending AppLayout demo. The use of@Routeand@PageTitleannotations is appropriate for setting up the demo view. Ensure that the URL/viewcorrectly points to the intended content.src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java (1)
27-29: Verify routing and layout integration.The
SampleViewclass has been updated to useCustomAppLayoutas its layout. Ensure thatCustomAppLayoutis correctly defined and that this change aligns with the intended design. The removal of@Ignoreindicates that this class is now part of the active test suite.Verification successful
CustomAppLayout is correctly defined and integrated.
The
CustomAppLayoutclass is defined and extendsAppLayout, confirming its intended use as a layout. This aligns with the design expectations for theSampleViewclass. No further issues are found with the routing and layout integration.
- Definition confirmed in
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of `CustomAppLayout`. # Test: Search for the definition of `CustomAppLayout`. Expect: Definition should exist. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'public class CustomAppLayout extends $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrences of `CustomAppLayout` to verify its existence. # Search for the definition of `CustomAppLayout` in the codebase. rg 'class CustomAppLayout' -A 5Length of output: 606
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/DemoView.java (2)
33-33: Class Reference Corrected inbeforeEnter.The class reference in the
beforeEntermethod has been corrected toAppLayoutDemoView.class. This ensures that the navigation logic points to the correct class.
20-20: Package Declaration Updated.The package declaration has been updated to
com.flowingcode.vaadin.addons.applayout, which likely reflects a restructuring or reorganization of the package hierarchy. Ensure that this change is consistent across the codebase.src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java (1)
20-39: New Demo View Setup.The
AppLayoutDemoViewclass sets up a structured demo for the AppLayout component usingTabbedDemo. This aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance compatibility with the AddonsDemo project. Ensure that the demos added (AppLayoutDemoandExtendingAppLayoutDemo) are correctly implemented and functional.src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java (2)
26-27: SuppressWarnings Annotation Added.The
@SuppressWarnings("serial")annotation is added to suppress serialization-related warnings. This is appropriate for classes that implementSerializablebut do not explicitly declare aserialVersionUID.
27-29: Class Renaming and Constructor Update.The class has been renamed from
AbstractLayoutDemotoCustomAppLayout, reflecting a change in its identity or purpose. The constructor has been updated accordingly. Ensure that all references to the old class name are updated throughout the codebase.src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java (1)
234-234: Verify the implementation and usage ofSampleInternalView.The menu item now uses
SampleInternalView.class. Ensure thatSampleInternalViewis correctly implemented and integrated within the application.Verification successful
SampleInternalViewis correctly implemented and used.The class
SampleInternalViewis defined and referenced appropriately in the codebase. The change to useSampleInternalView.classin the menu item is valid and correctly integrated.
SampleInternalViewis defined insrc/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleInternalView.java.- Referenced in
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `SampleInternalView`. # Test: Search for the class definition and references to `SampleInternalView`. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class SampleInternalView { $$$ }'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all class definitions in the codebase to find any class similar to `SampleInternalView`. ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ }' # Search for references to `SampleInternalView` in the codebase to check its usage. rg 'SampleInternalView'Length of output: 428
pom.xml (3)
18-18: LGTM! Property addition enhances maintainability.The addition of the
flowingcode.commons.demo.versionproperty helps manage dependency versions consistently.
51-53: LGTM! Dependency management is improved.Adding
commons-demoto the<dependencyManagement>section centralizes version control, which is a best practice.
106-110: LGTM! Test scope dependency addition is appropriate.The addition of
commons-demoas a test scope dependency aligns with the project's testing requirements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java (2)
9-13: LGTM: Annotations are appropriate and align with PR objectives.The class-level annotations are well-structured and serve their intended purposes:
@DemoSourceannotations correctly reference the Java view and CSS files.@PageTitlesets an appropriate page title.@Routedefines a consistent routing path and layout.Consider adding a brief JavaDoc comment above the class declaration to describe the purpose of this demo class. This would enhance code documentation and maintainability.
16-23: LGTM: Constructor implementation aligns with PR objectives.The constructor effectively sets up the demo by creating an iframe to display the AppLayout:
- CSS class names are used for styling.
- The IFrame is correctly configured to be full-size and borderless.
- The implementation aligns with the goal of displaying the AppLayout within an iframe.
Consider extracting the iframe URL "/applayout-full" as a constant at the class level. This would improve maintainability if the URL needs to be changed in the future.
Example:
private static final String APPLAYOUT_FULL_URL = "/applayout-full"; public AppLayoutDemo() { // ... IFrame iframe = new IFrame(APPLAYOUT_FULL_URL); // ... }src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java (2)
27-27: Consider implementing serialVersionUID instead of suppressing the warningWhile
@SuppressWarnings("serial")effectively silences the compiler warning, it doesn't address the underlying issue. For better maintainability and to follow best practices for serializable classes, consider implementing aserialVersionUIDinstead.You could replace the suppression with:
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;This approach provides better control over serialization compatibility in future versions.
Line range hint
31-33: Consider enhancing the view contentWhile the current implementation is functional, it might not fully demonstrate the capabilities of the AppLayout. Consider enhancing the content of this view to provide a more comprehensive demonstration of the AppLayout features.
For example, you could add more components or a more complex layout structure:
public class SampleView extends VerticalLayout { public SampleView() { H1 header = new H1("Welcome to AppLayout Demo"); Paragraph description = new Paragraph("This is a sample view demonstrating AppLayout capabilities."); Button actionButton = new Button("Click me!"); actionButton.addClickListener(e -> Notification.show("Button clicked!")); add(header, description, actionButton); setAlignItems(Alignment.CENTER); } }This would provide a richer demonstration of how components can be arranged within the AppLayout.
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java (3)
26-27: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The changes to the class declaration look good and align with the PR objectives. The
@SuppressWarnings("serial")annotation is appropriate for Vaadin components. The class name change fromAbstractLayoutDemotoCustomAppLayoutbetter reflects its purpose.Consider prefixing the class name with "Demo" (e.g.,
DemoCustomAppLayout) to clearly indicate its role in the demo framework. This would improve consistency if other demo classes follow a similar naming convention.
29-29: Approve constructor change with a suggestion for improvement.The constructor name change correctly reflects the new class name, which is good. The implementation remains unchanged, maintaining the existing functionality.
Consider refactoring the constructor to improve code organization:
- Extract the menu header creation into a separate private method.
- Extract the logo creation into a separate private method.
- Extract the title creation into a separate private method.
This would make the constructor more concise and easier to read. For example:
public CustomAppLayout() { setMenuItems(new MenuItem("Item 1"), new MenuItem("Item 2")); setMenuHeader(createMenuHeader()); addToTitleSection(createLogo()); addToTitleSection(createTitle()); } private Div createMenuHeader() { // Implementation here } private Image createLogo() { // Implementation here } private Div createTitle() { // Implementation here }This refactoring would improve maintainability and make it easier to modify individual components of the layout in the future.
Line range hint
1-55: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to this file effectively support the PR's goal of enhancing the AppLayout demos and improving compatibility with the AddonsDemo project. The class has been appropriately renamed and restructured as a concrete implementation of
AppLayout, which aligns with the objective of creating a custom demo layout.Key points:
- The class rename from
AbstractLayoutDemotoCustomAppLayoutreflects its specific purpose.- Extending
AppLayoutdirectly allows for a concrete implementation of the demo layout.- The existing functionality for setting up menu items, header, logo, and title has been preserved.
These changes contribute to the overall objective of streamlining navigation and enhancing the organization of the demo structure. The custom layout created here can be effectively used within an iframe, as proposed in the PR objectives.
To further align with the PR objectives, consider the following next steps:
- Implement the iframe structure that will contain this
CustomAppLayout.- Create multiple instances or configurations of this layout to demonstrate different AppLayout setups.
- Develop the tab selection mechanism that allows users to switch between these different demo configurations.
These additional steps will complete the implementation of the proposed demo structure and fully meet the objectives outlined in the PR summary.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- pom.xml (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleInternalView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/DemoView.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/ExtendingAppLayoutDemo.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (27)
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemo.java (3)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The package declaration and imports are well-organized and relevant to the class's functionality. All necessary Vaadin components and annotations are correctly imported.
14-14: LGTM: Class declaration is appropriate.The
AppLayoutDemoclass is correctly declared as public and extendsDiv, which is suitable for a demo component. This structure allows for easy content addition and styling.
1-24: Overall: Well-implemented demo class aligning with PR objectives.The
AppLayoutDemoclass effectively implements the requirements outlined in the PR objectives. It creates a demo view that displays the AppLayout within an iframe, allowing for easy integration with the AddonsDemo project. The code is well-structured, uses appropriate annotations, and follows good practices for Vaadin component development.Minor suggestions for improvement:
- Add a brief JavaDoc comment to describe the class purpose.
- Consider extracting the iframe URL as a constant for improved maintainability.
These changes are optional and do not affect the functionality of the demo.
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/ExtendingAppLayoutDemo.java (4)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name follows Java naming conventions, and the imports are relevant to the implemented functionality. There are no unused imports.
14-14: LGTM: Class declaration is appropriate.The class name
ExtendingAppLayoutDemois descriptive and follows Java naming conventions. ExtendingDivis suitable for creating a custom component in Vaadin, and the class is correctly declared as public.
9-13: Verify the existence of referenced demo source files.The @demosource annotations reference two files:
- "/src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java"
- "/src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java"
Please ensure these files exist in the project. If they are part of this PR, consider including them in the review.
The other annotations (@PageTitle, @SuppressWarnings, @route) are appropriately used.
Run the following script to verify the existence of the referenced files:
✅ Verification successful
Referenced demo source files exist.
Both
@DemoSourceannotations correctly reference existing files:
/src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java/src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.javaThe other annotations (@PageTitle, @SuppressWarnings, @route) are appropriately used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of referenced demo source files # Test: Check if CustomAppLayout.java exists fd -p "src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/CustomAppLayout.java" # Test: Check if SampleView.java exists fd -p "src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java"Length of output: 277
16-23: Implementation looks good, but verify CSS and IFrame source.The constructor implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of displaying the AppLayout in an iframe. However, please consider the following points:
- Verify that the CSS classes "wrap-iframe" and "frame" are defined in your stylesheet.
- Ensure that the IFrame source "/view" correctly points to the intended content.
Otherwise, the implementation is appropriate, setting the IFrame to full size and removing the border for seamless integration.
Run the following script to check for the CSS classes and the "/view" route:
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleView.java (3)
29-29: Approve class renaming to SampleViewThe renaming from
AbstractLayoutViewtoSampleViewis a good change. It better reflects the nature of the class as a concrete view rather than an abstract layout. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of improving demo compatibility and clarity.
28-28: Verify CustomAppLayout implementationThe update to use
CustomAppLayout.classin the@Routeannotation aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating with the AddonsDemo framework. This change suggests a more tailored layout for this specific demo.Please ensure that
CustomAppLayoutis properly implemented and compatible with the AddonsDemo structure. Run the following script to check the CustomAppLayout implementation:✅ Verification successful
CustomAppLayout implementation verified
The
CustomAppLayoutclass is properly implemented and extendsAppLayout, ensuring compatibility with the AddonsDemo framework.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check CustomAppLayout implementation # Test: Search for CustomAppLayout class definition ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class CustomAppLayout { $$$ }' # Test: Check if CustomAppLayout extends AppLayout ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class CustomAppLayout extends AppLayout { $$$ }'Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for CustomAppLayout class # Search for any occurrence of 'CustomAppLayout' class definition rg 'class\s+CustomAppLayout\b' --type java # Search for 'CustomAppLayout' in any file to identify its usage and location rg 'CustomAppLayout' --type javaLength of output: 692
29-29: Verify test coverage after removing @ignoreThe removal of the
@Ignoreannotation is appropriate if this view is now ready for testing. This aligns with the PR objectives of making the demo functional.Please ensure that there are appropriate test cases for this view. Run the following script to check for related test files:
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/SampleInternalView.java (4)
27-27: LGTM: Suppressing serialization warnings.The addition of
@SuppressWarnings("serial")is appropriate for suppressing warnings related to serialization, which is a common practice for classes extendingSerializable(likeDiv) when serialization is not a concern.
32-32: LGTM: Constructor name updated.The constructor name has been correctly updated to
SampleInternalView()to match the new class name. This change is consistent and necessary following the class renaming.
27-32: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives.The modifications in this file, including the class renaming and related updates, contribute to the PR's goal of enhancing the AppLayout demos. The new name
SampleInternalViewsuggests a more organized approach to presenting different configurations, which aligns with the objective of creating multiple, easily navigable demos within the AddonsDemo framework.These changes support the overall aim of improving the demo structure and enhancing compatibility with the AddonsDemo project. The clearer naming convention will likely facilitate easier navigation between different demos, as outlined in the PR objectives.
30-30: Approve class renaming and verify usage.The renaming from
InternalViewtoSampleInternalViewimproves clarity and aligns with the class's purpose as a sample view. This change enhances code readability and maintainability.Please ensure that all references to this class throughout the codebase have been updated. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old class name:
✅ Verification successful
Class renaming verified successfully.
No remaining references to the old class name
InternalViewwere found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old class name 'InternalView' # Test: Search for 'InternalView' in all Java files rg --type java 'InternalView'Length of output: 382
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/DemoView.java (3)
33-33: Approve class reference update and verify class namingThe class reference update from
ApplayoutDemoView.classtoAppLayoutDemoView.classcorrects a typo and improves code consistency.To ensure the referenced class exists with the correct name, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and naming of AppLayoutDemoView class # Test: Search for the AppLayoutDemoView class definition. Expect: One result showing the class definition. rg --type java "class AppLayoutDemoView"
20-20: Approve package name update and verify importsThe package name update from
com.flowingcode.addons.applayouttocom.flowingcode.vaadin.addons.applayoutaligns with the PR objectives and likely standardizes the package structure across the project.To ensure consistency, please verify that all files importing this package have been updated accordingly. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old package name:
✅ Verification successful
Package name update verified
The search for references to the old package name
com.flowingcode.addons.applayoutreturned no results, confirming that all imports have been updated accordingly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the old package name # Test: Search for the old package name. Expect: No results. rg --type java "com\.flowingcode\.addons\.applayout"Length of output: 171
Line range hint
1-35: Review related documentation and check for TODOsThe changes in this file appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort. To ensure completeness:
- Please review and update any related documentation that might reference the old package name or class name.
- Check for any TODOs or FIXMEs in related files that might need to be addressed as part of this refactoring.
Run the following script to check for TODOs or FIXMEs that might be related to this refactoring:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: No TODOs or FIXMEs Found
The searches did not locate any TODO or FIXME comments related to
AppLayoutor package renaming in the Java files. No further action is required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for TODOs or FIXMEs related to AppLayout or package renaming # Test: Search for TODOs or FIXMEs mentioning AppLayout or package names. Expect: Any relevant results to be reviewed. rg --type java "(TODO|FIXME).*(\bAppLayout\b|\bpackage\b)"Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all TODOs or FIXMEs in Java files # Test: Retrieve all TODO and FIXME comments in Java files to ensure no outstanding tasks are overlooked. rg --type java "(TODO|FIXME)"Length of output: 31
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java (4)
1-19: LGTM: Licensing information is correct and properly formatted.The file includes the appropriate Apache License, Version 2.0 header, which is essential for open-source projects.
20-26: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name aligns with the file location, and all imports are relevant to the class functionality. No unused imports are present.
34-39: LGTM: Constructor implementation aligns with PR objectives.The constructor effectively initializes the view by adding two demo components (AppLayoutDemo and ExtendingAppLayoutDemo) and setting the size to full. This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of creating multiple demos to showcase different configurations of the AppLayout.
1-40: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The
AppLayoutDemoViewclass successfully implements the desired demo structure for the AppLayout addon. It provides a foundation for showcasing different AppLayout configurations within the AddonsDemo framework, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is well-organized, follows Vaadin best practices, and sets up the necessary components for a tabbed demo view.To fully meet the PR objectives:
- Ensure that the
AppLayoutDemoandExtendingAppLayoutDemocomponents are implemented to display the AppLayout within an iframe.- Verify that the tab selection mechanism allows users to switch between different demos effectively.
Great job on implementing this new demo view!
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/addons/applayout/ApplayoutDemoView.java (2)
Line range hint
1-368: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications in this file, including the updated route value and internal view class reference, contribute positively to the PR objectives. These changes support the goal of making the AppLayout demos compatible with the AddonsDemo project and enhance the overall demo structure. The new route "applayout-full" suggests a comprehensive demo view, which aligns with the intention to display the complete AppLayout within an iframe.
To ensure a smooth integration, consider the following:
- Update any documentation or references to the old route "applayout".
- Verify that the
SampleInternalViewclass is properly implemented and consistent with the demo requirements.- Test the new demo structure to confirm it meets the objectives of showcasing different AppLayout configurations effectively.
234-234: LGTM: Internal view class reference updated.The change from
InternalView.classtoSampleInternalView.classin the MenuItem constructor is a good improvement. The new name is more descriptive and better aligns with its purpose in a demo context.To ensure consistency and prevent any potential issues, please verify that this change has been applied consistently throughout the project:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old InternalView class rg --type java --type typescript --type javascript 'InternalView' # Search for references to the new SampleInternalView class rg --type java --type typescript --type javascript 'SampleInternalView'pom.xml (4)
58-62: LGTM! Good practice for dependency management.The addition of the commons-demo dependency in the dependencyManagement section is a good practice. It ensures consistent version management across the project and its modules. The use of the property for the version is also consistent with the earlier change.
18-18: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to the
pom.xmlfile, including the addition of the commons-demo dependency and its version management, align well with the PR objective of making AppLayout demos compatible with the AddonsDemo project. These changes provide a solid foundation for integrating the AppLayout demos with the existing AddonsDemo framework.Key points:
- Version management is centralized using a property.
- The dependency is properly declared in both dependencyManagement and dependencies sections.
- The test scope is appropriately used for the demo library.
These changes contribute to better dependency management and set the stage for the integration of AppLayout demos with the AddonsDemo project.
Also applies to: 58-62, 114-118
114-118: LGTM! Verify test scope usage.The addition of the commons-demo dependency with test scope is appropriate for a demo library. The version is correctly omitted here as it will be inherited from the dependencyManagement section.
To ensure the test scope is being used correctly, you can run the following command to check for any usage of commons-demo classes outside of test files:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of commons-demo classes outside of test files # Test: Search for imports of commons-demo classes in non-test Java files rg "import.*com\.flowingcode\.vaadin\.addons\.demo" --type java --glob '!**/test/**'
18-18: LGTM! Consider verifying version compatibility.The addition of the
flowingcode.commons.demo.versionproperty is a good practice for centralized version management. However, as this is a major version (4.0.0), it's important to ensure compatibility with the rest of the project.To verify the compatibility, you can run the following command to check for any breaking changes or migration guides:
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/applayout/AppLayoutDemoView.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Closes #124
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes