Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explicit retry_decorator dependency #153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2013

Conversation

rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor

@jterrace
Copy link
Contributor

The only thing I think this is missing is updating our submodules in /third_party and updating the gsutil script's THIRD_PARTY_LIBS variable to add the new submodule to the python path for the tarball distribution method. Could you add those too?

@jterrace
Copy link
Contributor

We also need you to sign the CLA before we can accept this. Please see instructions here:
https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/gsutil/addlhelp/ContributingCodetogsutil

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated the gsutil script, and added a submodule to the .gitmodules file, I think that should do the trick. Pushed the changes to my branch on GitHub.

Regarding the contribution agreement, to ensure that I can sign it I've asked the legal folks, I expect to hear back by tomorrow.

@jterrace
Copy link
Contributor

@rjschwei ping - were you able to sign the CLA?

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

On 08/23/2013 09:48 PM, Jeff Terrace wrote:

@rjschwei https://github.com/rjschwei ping - were you able to sign the
CLA?

Stuck in legal, juck......

They will get pressure to move from up the chain of command on Monday,
stay tuned.

Thanks,
Robert

Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
[email protected]
[email protected]
781-464-8147

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

Contribution agreement signed and sent to [email protected]

You should be good to go to merge this. Any chance we can get a tagged release after this is merged?

Thanks

@jterrace
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Robert, did you send the CLA to [email protected] or [email protected] ? The latter is the correct address.

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

On 08/28/2013 10:51 PM, Jeff Terrace wrote:

Hey Robert, did you send the CLA to [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] or [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] ? The latter is the correct address.

Ugh, it was sent to [email protected]. I just send it to
[email protected] hopefully this will be processed quickly.

Thanks,
Robert

Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
[email protected]
[email protected]
781-464-8147

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

There appears to be an issue with the Google mail service :(. My message bounced back as Undeliverable, I had another message that I sent ot a Google group also come back....

@rjschwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

On 08/28/2013 10:51 PM, Jeff Terrace wrote:

Hey Robert, did you send the CLA to [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] or [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] ? The latter is the correct address.

After some issues with mail delivery I think I finally managed to get
the agreement delivered to [email protected], can you please
double check that everything is in order?

Thanks,
Robert

Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
[email protected]
[email protected]
781-464-8147

@mfschwartz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Robert,

We received your CLA signature - all is in order. Thanks!

Mike

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Robert Schweikert <[email protected]

wrote:

On 08/28/2013 10:51 PM, Jeff Terrace wrote:

Hey Robert, did you send the CLA to [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] or [email protected]
mailto:[email protected] ? The latter is the correct address.

After some issues with mail delivery I think I finally managed to get
the agreement delivered to [email protected], can you please
double check that everything is in order?

Thanks,
Robert

Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
[email protected]
[email protected]
781-464-8147

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/153#issuecomment-23597383
.

@jterrace jterrace merged commit 4b6b54e into GoogleCloudPlatform:master Sep 4, 2013
@jterrace
Copy link
Contributor

jterrace commented Sep 4, 2013

Hey Robert,

I merged this in and fixed up a couple things with additional commits. Thanks for the contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants