The Effective Type Sanitizer --- Dynamically Typed C/C++

EffectiveSan is a compiler tool that automatically inserts dynamic (i.e., runtime) type and bounds checking into C/C++ programs. The aim of EffectiveSan is to detect memory errors and type bugs in arbitrary C/C++ code.

Background

C and C++ are examples of statically typed programming languages, meaning that types are checked at compile time and not at runtime. Furthermore, C and C++ are weakly typed programming languages that allow the type system to be bypassed, including:

• Arbitrary Casts, e.g., casting from a (T *) to an (S *) is possible (both explicitly and implicitly via operations like memcpy); and
• No Bounds Checking, e.g., if reading the i^th element of a (int[50]) array object, then it is never checked (statically or dynamically) that (i < 50); and
• Use-after-free (allowing possible type mutation) is also possible.

Weak static typing is primarily motivated by flexibility and efficiency (dynamic type and bounds checking is expensive). However, this also means that the programmer is responsible for ensuring that types are not violated at runtime. In practice, the programmer does not always get it right, and bugs relating to type violations are common and potentially serious. For example, consider the following "benign" code snippet:

    struct S {int a[3]; char *p;};
    struct T {float f; struct S s;};

    int get(struct T *t, int idx)
    {
        return t->s.a[idx];
    }

This snippet is well-typed according to standard C/C++ static type checking. However, at runtime, a lot can go wrong:

• Type Confusion Errors: Pointer t may be of the wrong type:

    S *s = (S *)malloc(sizeof(struct S));
    get((T *)s, 2);
  

• Use-after-free Errors: Pointer t may have been free'ed:

    free(t);
    get(t, 2);
  

• (Sub-)Object Bounds Errors: Index idx may be outside the bounds of the (sub-)object (a):

    get(t, 3);
  

In practice, type and memory errors can be a lot more subtle, and are a common source of security vulnerabilities, program bugs, and other undefined behavior. For example, such errors are commonly exploited for control flow hijacking attacks, e.g., by overwriting the virtual function table pointer (vptr) of C++ objects. This can be achieved in several ways using the runtime errors described above, including:

• Using a object bounds overflow from object A to B to directly overwrite B.vptr;
• Using a sub-object bounds overflow within the same object B to directly overwrite B.vptr;
• Using type confusion to cast a pointer p to B to a different type, then overwrite B.vptr indirectly using a "valid" operation on p; and
• Using a Use-after-free similar to type confusion, where previously free'ed pointer p points to a different type.

Assuming an attacker can overwrite the vptr with a suitable value, control flow can then be hijacked using a call to a virtual function.

Beyond security, it is often useful to detect and eliminate deliberate type-based undefined behavior---so-called type abuse---since it can harm code quality/portability. For example, one idiom we have observed in the wild is to implement C++-style inheritance using structures with overlapping members, e.g.:

    struct Base { int x; float y; };
    struct Derived { int x; float y; char z; };

We have observed such idioms in SPEC2006's perlbench and povray benchmarks (despite povray being a C++ program). Such idioms may violate the compiler's Type Base Aliasing Analysis (TBAA) assumptions, causing code to be miscompiled, else requiring special compiler options such as -fno-strict-aliasing. Type abuse may also mask dangerous (security critical) type errors as well.

Dynamic Typing for C and C++

The Effective Type Sanitizer (EffectiveSan) is a tool for instrumenting C/C++ programs with dynamic type checks---effectively transforming C/C++ into a dynamically typed programming languages. The instrumented dynamic type check compares the runtime type of an object (a.k.a. the effective type using C standard terminology) against the static type declared in the code. An error will be logged if there is a mismatch.

For example, EffectiveSan will instrument the get() function by adding type and bounds checks:

    int get(struct T *t, int idx)
    {
        BOUNDS b = type_check(t, struct T);     // Inserted type check
        b = bounds_narrow(b, t->s.a);           // Inserted bounds narrow
        int *tmp = &t->s.a;
        bounds_check(tmp, b);                   // Inserted bounds check
        return tmp[idx];
    }

Here, three additional operations are inserted:

• type_check checks that the dynamic type of pointer t matches the static type (struct T). This means that t must point to either an object of type struct T, a sub-object of type struct T of some larger object, or a (sub-)object of some other type coercible to type struct T (e.g., a character array char[]). If the type is compatible, the dynamic (sub-)object bounds is returned.
• bounds_narrow narrows the bounds b to the sub-object of interest. In this case, the sub-object is s.a.
• bounds_check verifies that the memory access is within the narrowed bounds.

If either type_check or bounds_check fails then an error will be logged. By default, all logged errors are printed to stderr when the program exits (EffectiveSan does not stop execution, although this is configurable).

The inserted instrumentation can detect type and memory errors described above. For example, consider the type error:

    S *s = (S *)malloc(sizeof(struct S));
    get((T *)s, 2);

Then running this program results in a type error:

    TYPE ERROR:
            pointer  = 0x30a12d3740 (heap)
            expected = struct T
            actual   = struct S { int32_t[3]; /*0..12*/ int8_t *; /*16..24*/ } [+0]
                       >int32_t [+0]

Here:

• pointer is the pointer value, which happens to be allocated from the heap;
• expected is the expected type, which in this case is (struct T); and
• actual is the actual dynamic type of the pointer. The "actual" type is represented as a set of (type [+offset]) pairs, starting from the allocation type of the object (struct S), all the way to the type of the inner-most sub-object at the same offset (int32_t, a.k.a. int). Offset values are in bytes. Any pair with zero offset (i.e., [+0]) represents a valid type for the pointer. In other words, this is a type error because there is no "actual" type pair corresponding to (struct T [+0]).

Next, consider the use-after-free error:

    free(t);
    get(t, 2);

EffectiveSan considers "free" objects to have a special "<free memory>" type. This allows use-after-free errors to be detected as a special kind of type error:

    USE-AFTER-FREE ERROR:
            pointer  = 0x4034b5bfd0 (heap)
            expected = struct T
            actual   = <free memory> [+0]

Finally, consider the (sub-)object bounds error:

    get(t, 4)

EffectiveSan uses dynamic typing and bounds narrowing to detect sub-object bounds errors:

    SUBOBJECT BOUNDS ERROR:
            pointer  = 0x405efddc68 (heap)
            type     = struct T { float32_t; /*0..4*/ struct S; /*8..32*/ } [+8..+20]
                       >struct S { int32_t[3]; /*0..12*/ int8_t *; /*16..24*/ } [+0..+12]
                       >>int32_t [+0..+12]
            bounds   = 0..12 (8..20)
            access   = 16..20 (24..28)

Here:

• pointer is the pointer value, similar to before;
• type is a set of (type [+lb..+ub]) triples representing the dynamic type of the accessed (sub-)object, and the accessed sub-object's bounds. Bounds are pairs of byte offsets;
• bounds is the bounds of the accessed sub-object in (1) bounds relative to the start of the sub-object, and (2) bounds relative to the start of the allocation; and
• access is the bounds of the memory access, relative to (1) and (2) explained above.

Using the above instrumentation, EffectiveSan can detect multiple classes of errors, including type confusion, object bounds errors, sub-object bounds errors, and use-after-free errors---all using the same underlying methodology.

How EffectiveSan Works

We give a very brief overview on how some of the internals of EffectiveSan work. For more detailed information, please see our paper (see further reading below) or study the source code.

EffectiveSan consists of three main components:

1. A "modified" clang front-end that preserves high-level C/C++ type information as LLVM IR meta-data.
2. A LLVM-instrumentation pass that inserts type/bounds checks, as well as replaces memory allocation with the "typed" version.
3. A run-time support library that implements the meta data tracking scheme.

The runtime system for tracking dynamic types is the main innovation. The basic idea is to build on top of low fat pointers which are a system for tracking the bounds (size and base) of allocated objects, which was originally developed for bounds checking. Instead, EffectiveSan uses low fat pointers to store type meta data at the base of allocated objects. For example, consider the memory allocation:

    q = (struct T *)malloc(sizeof(struct T));

Then, under EffectiveSan, the memory layout will be as follows:

Here (META) is the EffectiveSan object meta data comprising (1) a reference to the type meta data for (struct T), and (2) the size (array length) of the allocation. Note that META is stored in the memory immediately before the allocated object. The memory layout of the object itself is unchanged, which is critical for compatibility. EffectiveSan similarly transforms stack and global objects.

The combined META and object are allocated using the low-fat pointer allocator. This means that any interior pointer, e.g., (p) can be efficiently mapped to the base address (base(p)) which contains META. The EffectiveSan runtime therefore has access to the following information:

1. The dynamic type of (q) (from META);
2. The static type of (p) (from the source code); and
3. The offset between (p) and (q) (calculated).

The EffectiveSan runtime maps the (dynamic-type, static-type, offset) triple to (sub-)object bounds (relative to p) using a layout hash table stored in the type meta data. For example, the layout hash table for (struct T) is as follows:

    (T, T, 0) ---> -oo..oo     (T, float, 0) ---> 0..4     (T, S, 4) ---> 0..20
    (T, int, 4) ---> 0..12     (T, int, 8) ---> -4..8      (T, int, 12) ---> −8..4
    (T, char *, 16) ---> 0..8

Each entry represents a (sub-)object for type (struct T).

For example, if p has the static type (int *), the corresponding triple will be (T, int, 12). This triple corresponds to the sub-object (T.s.a), and the sub-object bounds (in bytes) is therefore p-8..p+4.

In contrast, if p has the static type (float *), the corresponding triple will be (T, float, 12). This triple has no entry (i.e., a hash table miss), meaning that a type error is detected.

Benchmarks

We compare EffectiveSan against an uninstrumented baseline. For these tests, we use the standard SPEC2006 benchmark suite:

We also compare two different versions of EffectiveSan:

• EffectiveSan; and
• EffectiveSan (no logging).

Both versions use the EFFECTIVE_SINGLETHREADED runtime option (SPEC2006 is single-threaded), and the "no logging" version uses the additional EFFECTIVE_NOLOG runtime option. The former represents "normal" use, which includes both instrumentation and logging overheads, while the latter is a better estimate of the instrumentation overhead only. Some benchmarks, notably perlbench and gcc, generate many errors meaning the logging overhead is more significant.

Overall we see that EffectiveSan (logging) is 3.53x the uninstrumented baseline, and EffectiveSan (no logging) is slightly faster at 3.41x the baseline. For reference, a typical bounds checking sanitizer (e.g., AddressSanitizer), that does no type nor sub-object bounds checking, has a typical overhead of 1.5-2.0x. EffectiveSan is intended to be a trade-off: although it is generally more expensive it is also more comprehensive in the class and number of errors detected.

EffectiveSan exhibits a low memory overhead of 1.12x for SPEC2006.

EffectiveSan detects may type, (sub-)object bounds, and use-after-free errors in the SPEC2006 benchmarks, some known and some new. These include:

• A use-after-free bug in perlbench (test benchmark only, previously found by ASAN).
• A bounds overflow error in h264ref (previously found by ASAN).
• Sub-object bounds overflow errors in gcc, h264ref and soplex.
• Multiple type errors.

The type errors are summarized in the paper (see further reading below). Most type errors appear to be related to type abuse, i.e., deliberate type errors introduced by the programmer. Although sometimes it is hard to be sure without knowing the programmer's intent. Some examples of type errors include:

• xalancbmk uses bad C++ downcasts, e.g. casting a DTDGrammar to a SchemaGrammar;
• gcc/sphinx3 casting objects to (int[]) to calculate hash values or checksums;
• gcc using incompatible definitions (over different modules) for the "same" type;
• bzip2/lbm confusing fundamental types (e.g., int vs float, etc.);
• perlbench/povray's ad hoc implementation of C++-style inheritance by defining structures with a common shared prefix.

Further Reading

For more detailed information EffectiveSan, please see our PLDI'2018 paper:

• Gregory J. Duck and Roland H. C. Yap, EffectiveSan: Type and Memory Error Detection using Dynamically Typed C/C++, Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI'18), 2018

EffectiveSan is built on top of our earlier work on low fat pointers. More information can be found here:

• Gregory J. Duck, Roland H. C. Yap, Heap Bounds Protection with Low Fat Pointers, Compiler Construction (CC'16), 2016
• Gregory J. Duck, Roland H. C. Yap, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Stack Bounds Protection with Low Fat Pointers, Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS'17), 2017
• Implementation: https://github.com/GJDuck/LowFat

Usage

Installing

EffectiveSan releases can be downloaded from here: https://github.com/GJDuck/EffectiveSan/releases

EffectiveSan is implemented as a modified version of clang/LLVM for the x86_64/Linux architecture. To use, simply extract the distribution into your desired location, e.g.:

    $ tar xvfJ effectivesan-VERSION.tar.xz

No other special installation steps are required.

Running

To instrument a program using EffectiveSan, simply compile using the special modified clang/clang++ and the -fsanitize=effective -O2 options:

    $ effectivesan-VERSION/bin/clang -fsanitize=effective -O2 program.c
    $ effectivesan-VERSION/bin/clang++ -fsanitize=effective -O2 program.cpp

Note that EffectiveSan assumes -O2 optimization level in order to work correctly. Next, the resulting executable can be run as normal:

    $ ./a.out

A logged error messages should be printed to stderr when the program exits.

Note that it is common for the same type or bounds error to occur multiple times during program execution. By default, EffectiveSan will "group" similar errors, so as not to make the error log too long. Grouping behavior can be changed or disabled using the EFFECTIVE_VERBOSITY runtime option (see options below).

Options

EffectiveSan supports several compiler options listed below. To pass options to EffectiveSan, use the -mllvm clang option, e.g., -mllvm -effective-no-globals:

• -effective-no-escapes: Do not instrument pointer escapes.
• -effective-no-globals: Do not replace global variables.
• -effective-no-stack: Do not replace stack allocations.
• -effective-blacklist blacklist.txt: Do not instrument entries from the blacklist.txt file (in special case list format).
• -effective-warnings: Enable instrumentation warning messages.
• -effective-max-sub-objs max: Set max to be the maximum number of sub-objects per type meta data.

In addition to the compiler time options, EffectiveSan also supports several runtime options that can be set via environment variables:

• EFFECTIVE_NOTRACE=1: Do not print error stack traces (default off).
• EFFECTIVE_NOLOG=1: Do not print the log altogether (default off).
• EFFECTIVE_SINGLETHREADED=1: Assume the program is single-threaded (default off).
• EFFECTIVE_ABORT=1: Crash the program after printing the error report.
• EFFECTIVE_MAXERRS=N: Abort the program after N errors (default SIZE_MAX).
• EFFECTIVE_VERBOSITY=(0|1|2|9): Set error verbosity level, where higher means less error grouping, and 9 means no grouping (default 0).
• EFFECTIVE_LOGFILE=filename.txt: Dump the log to filename.txt rather than stderr.

Building

It is also possible to build EffectiveSan from source. To do so, simply extract the source distribution and run the build.sh script:

    $ ./build.sh

The entire build process should be automatic.

To also build the binary distribution, use the following command instead:

    $ ./build.sh release

FireFox

It is possible to build a version of the FireFox web browser using EffectiveSan. For this, run the following commands:

    $ cd firefox
    $ ./setup-firefox-build.sh

If this succeeds, then:

    $ cd firefox-52.2.1esr
    $ ./mach build
    $ ./mach run

Notes:

• Building has only been tested on our own machine: "Linux box 4.13.0-45-generic #50~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 30 11:18:27 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux" using a Xeon E5-2630 v4 CPU with 32Gb of RAM. The build may not work on a different machine.
• The build process will generate some TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL warnings about text relocations. These should not stop the build from running.
• The resulting FireFox is noticeably slower. This is to be expected.
• The resulting build has not been extensively tested and should be considered unstable. Some websites like youtube do not work, but most others appear OK under our tests. Building a stable version of FireFox, including removing errors caused by custom memory allocators (CMAs), would require considerable effort. We do not intend to maintain a stable build at this time.

Features

In addition to the core features (type/bounds/UAF-checking) highlighted above, EffectiveSan also supports the following:

• Unions: unions are supported by EffectiveSan the same way structs are. The only difference between a union and a struct is that the offset of each member is always zero. Otherwise, the internal representation and handling is the same.
• Flexible array members: These are structs where the last member has a flexible size. For example, with (struct vector {int len; int data[];}), then data is a flexible array member indicated by an unspecified array size. EffectiveSan supports types with flexible array members.
• C++ inheritance: Base classes are treated as a special kind of sub-object. Virtual inheritance is also supported.
• Automatic coercions: EffectiveSan can automatically coerce memory of type (char[]) to any type, and vice versa. Similarly, EffectiveSan will automatically coerce (void *) and (T *), and vice versa. Coercions usually incur extra overhead (more hash table lookups).
• Good compatibility: EffectiveSan has been designed to (1) not change the layout of objects in memory, and (2) not change the Application Binary Interface (ABI). For these reasons, EffectiveSan should achieve good compatibility with most existing software.
• Fast (for what it is): Some effort has been invested into optimizing EffectiveSan's instrumentation and runtime system. That said, there is probably more room for improvement.

Limitations

EffectiveSan is a complex sanitizer and therefore has some limitations:

• LowFat limitations: EffectiveSan is built on top of low fat pointers LowFat and inherits many of LowFat's underlying limitations. The main inherited limitations are:
  • Escaping Pointers
  • Global Variables
  • Operating System
  • Modern 64bit CPUs
  • Stack Object Ordering
  • Custom Stacks
  • Runtime Hardening
  • Spectre
  • Low Level Hacks
• Compilation crashes with a fatal error: For example, with "fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: ...". This appears to be a bug in clang itself (and has already been reported). More information can be found here: GJDuck/LowFat#12. A work-around is to disable instrumentation for global variables: -mllvm -effective-no-globals -mcmodel=small.
• Assembly: In order to support global variables, LowFat and EffectiveSan use the large code model. This also means that any inline or mixed assembly must also respect the large code model, else linker errors (relocation truncated to fit) will occur. A work-around is to disable instrumentation for global variables: -mllvm -effective-no-globals -mcmodel=small.
• Malloc type: EffectiveSan assumes that the first cast determines the allocation type for pointers returned by malloc (and family). Otherwise, if there is no cast, the type will be left as (char[]). Globals, stack allocations, and C++ new have explicitly declared types so no guessing is required.
• Simple errors may be missed: EffectiveSan may fail to detect "simple" errors that are statically visible, e.g., int x[100]; x[101] = 3;. This is mainly because clang/LLVM will "optimize" away such errors before the EffectiveSan instrumentation pass. EffectiveSan aims to detect "dynamic" errors only.
• Use-after-free (UAF) error detection is incomplete: EffectiveSan does not detect use-after-free errors that occur after a type check. Furthermore, EffectiveSan does not detect use-after-free errors where the free'ed object is reallocated to an object of the same type. Complete use-after-free detection in multi-threaded environments is difficult because of the race between the pointer dereference, deallocation, and the UAF-check.
• C/C++ undefined behavior: EffectiveSan does not aim to implement a strict interpretation of type-based undefined behavior under the C/C++ standards. To do so would require tracking properties such as pointer provenance. Nevertheless, EffectiveSan is a reasonable first approximation.
• Custom Memory Allocators (CMAs): EffectiveSan assumes that the program uses standard memory allocators, such as malloc for C and new for C++. If the program uses Custom Memory Allocators (CMAs) then EffectiveSan may fail to correctly type objects, leading to missed errors or false positives. CMAs are a problem for many dynamic analysis tools not just EffectiveSan.
• Limited multi-dimensional array support: EffectiveSan will flatten top-level multi-dimensional array objects, e.g. int *x = new int[3][4] will be treated the same as int *x = new int[12]. This is because the current implementation of the object meta data (META) can only encode one array length. Multi-dimensional array sub-objects (e.g. a struct member) are handled better.
• Some types are treated as equivalent: Due to the limitations of the clang frontend, some types are treated as equivalent. For example, int and enums, void * and vptrs, pointers and references, etc.
• Type errors on never-executed paths: EffectiveSan typically inserts the type check near the location where a pointer is "created", e.g., the start of a function for a pointer argument. This means it is possible that a type error will be reported even if the dereference is never reached. Early type checks are generally faster, e.g., once outside a loop versus every loop iteration.
• Sub-object merging: EffectiveSan will "merge" overlapping sub-objects with the same type but different bounds. For example, given (union U { struct { int pad; float x[2]; } s; float y[2]; }), then overlapping sub-objects x and y will be "merged" into a single sub-object of type (float[3]). This can only occur for unions.
• Incomplete type annotations: EffectiveSan relies on a "modified" clang front-end to pass C/C++ type information down to the LLVM IR level. However, clang was never designed to do this, and we are not expert clang hackers, so some type information is likely to be incomplete. Our main focus was on ensuring that the SPEC2006 benchmarks were reasonably covered.
• Meta data size limits: If a type has too many sub-object (see -effective-max-sub-objs limit, default 10000), the generated meta data may be incomplete, resulting in missed or spurious errors.
• Invalid type meta data error: This error may occur if the runtime meta data gets overwritten or unloaded somehow (e.g., by uninstrumented code).
• Error classification: EffectiveSan attempts to classify errors as TYPE, BOUNDS, SUB-OBJECT-BOUNDS and USE-AFTER-FREE. However, these are "best guesses" and sometimes EffectiveSan may mis-classify errors. For example:
  • Type confusion may manifest as a sub-object bounds error;
  • Bounds errors (for escaping pointers) may manifest as use-after-free errors or type errors.

The EffectiveSan option -effective-warnings will enable warnings about meta data limitations, if any. The following explains the meaning of each possible warning message:

• missing type meta data for value...: The modified clang frontend failed to annotate a value. This usually indicates there is a missing case somewhere in the frontend.
• type (T) is a forward declaration...: A type annotation exists but it is a forward declaration (empty definition). The frontend has been modified to avoid emitting forward declarations, however, the modifications are not perfect. This may result in type errors that are false positives.
• type (T) has too many sub-objects...: The -effective-max-sub-objs limit was reached, so EffectiveSan attempts to delete some (probably unused) sub-objects. However, this may result in type errors that are false positives.
• unable to instrument constant pointer cast...: There appears to be no way to annotate constant expressions (as far as we know), so EffectiveSan cannot yet instrument such casts.

We have mainly focused on minimizing such warnings for the SPEC2006 benchmarks. Other software may yield different results.

FAQ

Q: Why do we need EffectiveSan when we already have AddressSanitizer?

AddressSanitizer is a popular tool for detecting memory errors such as bounds overflows and use-after-free errors. EffectiveSan can also detect these kinds of errors, as well as other classes of error that AddressSanitizer cannot detect, such as:

• Sub-object overflows: Bounds errors within the same object. AddressSanitizer can only detect overflows that escape the bounds of the allocation; and
• Type errors: Accessing memory using the wrong type.

In addition to AddressSanitizer, there are a whole bunch of dynamic memory and type error detection tools. The main difference is that EffectiveSan attempts to be as comprehensive as possible, i.e., detecting all type/memory errors using a single underlying methodology.

Q: Why does EffectiveSan report so many type errors? Most type errors are harmless.

EffectiveSan reports anything deemed to be a type violation. Programmers sometimes introduce "deliberate" type errors for various reasons, such as convenience, efficiency, "cool hacks", etc. This is so-called "type abuse". EffectiveSan does not (and cannot) distinguish between accidental and deliberate type errors.

Although type abuse may seem harmless, it is nevertheless undefined behavior under the C/C++ standards. One common problem is the interaction of type abuse and Type Based Alias Analysis (TBAA), which can result in the program being "mis-compiled".

Q: Why does EffectiveSan report type errors for std::map and std::set?

For example, one typical type error is something like the following:

    TYPE ERROR:
            pointer  = 0x1a00d02adb0 (heap)
            expected = struct std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<xalanc_1_8::XalanQNameByReference const, xalanc_1_8::ElemTemplate const*> >
            actual   = ...
                       ...
                       >>>>>struct std::_Rb_tree_node_base { int32_t; /*0..4*/ struct std::_Rb_tree_node_base *; /*8..16*/ struct std::_Rb_tree_node_base *; /*16..24*/ struct std::_Rb_tree_node_base *; /*24..32*/ } [+0]

These errors are caused by a combination of (1) bad casts in C++ standard library header files, and (2) EffectiveSan may report type errors on never-executed paths. For example, the end() method contains a bad cast from a _Rb_tree_node_base to a _Rb_tree_node (a.k.a. _Link_type):

    _Link_type
    _M_end() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
    { return reinterpret_cast<_Link_type>(&this->_M_impl._M_header); }

This appears to be "type abuse" rather than an actual bug. These bad casts are also detected by other dynamic type checking tools such as CaVer.

Follow-up Work

• C. Poncelet et al., So Many Fuzzers, So Little Time, ASE 2022, This paper combines EffectiveSan with fuzzing, and found several vulnerabilies in the Contiki-NG Network Stack that were not exposed by ASAN.

Versions

EffectiveSan should be considered alpha quality software. Since EffectiveSan is relatively complex, there are probably a lot of bugs. Please report issues here: https://github.com/GJDuck/EffectiveSan/issues

The released version of EffectiveSan has been improved since the prototype evaluated in the paper. Generally, the released version is faster (3.41x alpha overhead versus 3.88x for the prototype), contains fewer bugs, and offers more comprehensive error detection. The featured SPEC2006 issues reported in the paper text should be reproducible using the released alpha version. The issue count (Figure 7) should be generally consistent with the released alpha version, although the exact counts have changed due to bug fixes and different C++ standard library versions.

Thanks

This research was partially supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its National Cybersecurity R&D Program (TSUNAMi project, No. NRF2014NCR-NCR001-21) and administered by the National Cybersecurity R&D Directorate.