Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: remove missing feature regarding configurables (FuelLabs#4317)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
## Description

FuelLabs#2647 has been resolved.

## Checklist

- [ ] I have linked to any relevant issues.
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the
reference, and the Sway book).
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works.
- [ ] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary
`Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant.
- [ ] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs
Code Review
Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md).
- [ ] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
  • Loading branch information
eightfilms authored Mar 21, 2023
1 parent 8444306 commit 00ba771
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions docs/book/src/reference/known_issues_and_workarounds.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@

* [#1796](https://github.com/FuelLabs/sway/issues/2465): It is not yet allowed to use `StorageMap<K, V>` as a component of a complex type such as a struct or an enum.

* [#2647](https://github.com/FuelLabs/sway/issues/2647): Currently, it is only possible to define configuration-time constants that have [primitive types](../basics/built_in_types.md#primitive-types) and that are initialized using literals.

## General

* No compiler optimization passes have been implemented yet, therefore bytecode will be more expensive and larger than it would be in production. Note that eventually the optimizer will support zero-cost abstractions, avoiding the need for developers to go down to inline assembly to produce optimal code.

0 comments on commit 00ba771

Please sign in to comment.