-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve the retry support for nondeterministic expressions #11789
Open
firestarman
wants to merge
5
commits into
NVIDIA:branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from
firestarman:rand-retry
base: branch-25.02
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c5a0b8f
Improve the retry support for nondeterministic expressions
firestarman aab415f
fix a build error for scala3
firestarman 09413df
More retry support for GpuRand
firestarman 2646c68
Fix a test error
firestarman 82589e1
Fix another possible test error
firestarman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ | ||
# Copyright (c) 2024, NVIDIA CORPORATION. | ||
# | ||
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
# You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
# | ||
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
# | ||
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
# limitations under the License. | ||
|
||
import pytest | ||
|
||
from asserts import assert_gpu_and_cpu_are_equal_collect | ||
from data_gen import * | ||
from marks import * | ||
from spark_session import is_before_spark_351 | ||
|
||
import pyspark.sql.functions as f | ||
|
||
|
||
@ignore_order(local=True) | ||
@disable_ansi_mode # https://github.com/NVIDIA/spark-rapids/issues/5114 | ||
def test_group_agg_with_rand(): | ||
# GPU and CPU produce the same grouping rows but in different orders after Shuffle, | ||
# while the rand() always generates the same sequence. Then CPU and GPU will produce | ||
# different final rows after aggregation. See as below: | ||
# GPU output: | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# | a| random| | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# | 3| 0.619189370225301| | ||
# | 5| 0.5096018842446481| | ||
# | 2| 0.8325259388871524| | ||
# | 4|0.26322809041172357| | ||
# | 1| 0.6702867696264135| | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# CPU output: | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# | a| random| | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# | 1| 0.619189370225301| | ||
# | 2| 0.5096018842446481| | ||
# | 3| 0.8325259388871524| | ||
# | 4|0.26322809041172357| | ||
# | 5| 0.6702867696264135| | ||
# +---+-------------------+ | ||
# To make the output comparable, here builds a generator to generate only one group. | ||
const_int_gen = IntegerGen(nullable=False, min_val=1, max_val=1, special_cases=[]) | ||
|
||
def test(spark): | ||
return unary_op_df(spark, const_int_gen, num_slices=1).groupby('a').agg(f.rand(42)) | ||
assert_gpu_and_cpu_are_equal_collect(test) | ||
|
||
|
||
@ignore_order(local=True) | ||
def test_project_with_rand(): | ||
# To make the output comparable, here build a generator to generate only one value. | ||
# Not sure if Project could have the same order issue as groupBy, but still just in case. | ||
const_int_gen = IntegerGen(nullable=False, min_val=1, max_val=1, special_cases=[]) | ||
assert_gpu_and_cpu_are_equal_collect( | ||
lambda spark: unary_op_df(spark, const_int_gen, num_slices=1).select('a', f.rand(42)) | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
@ignore_order(local=True) | ||
def test_filter_with_rand(): | ||
const_int_gen = IntegerGen(nullable=False, min_val=1, max_val=1, special_cases=[]) | ||
assert_gpu_and_cpu_are_equal_collect( | ||
lambda spark: unary_op_df(spark, const_int_gen, num_slices=1).filter(f.rand(42) > 0.5) | ||
) | ||
|
||
# See https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9c0b803ba124a6e70762aec1e5559b0d66529f4d | ||
@ignore_order(local=True) | ||
@pytest.mark.skipif(is_before_spark_351(), | ||
reason='Generate supports nondeterministic inputs from Spark 3.5.1') | ||
def test_generate_with_rand(): | ||
const_int_gen = IntegerGen(nullable=False, min_val=1, max_val=1, special_cases=[]) | ||
assert_gpu_and_cpu_are_equal_collect( | ||
lambda spark: unary_op_df(spark, const_int_gen, num_slices=1).select( | ||
f.explode(f.array(f.rand(42)))) | ||
) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should there be a follow on issue for us to handle this properly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally we don't need to do anything. It is a pure Spark bug.
Spark 3.5.0 will complain the exception as below when evaluating a
rand()
in Generate with the codegen disabled and fail this test.And Spark before 3.5.0 will throw the following exception and fail the test too.
While GPU supports Generate with
rand
for all the versions. So to make this test work we have to ignore it for Spark before 3.5.1.