New Components - ortto #14703
New Components - ortto #14703
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and functionalities for the Ortto platform, including actions for creating custom activities, managing contacts, and opting out of SMS communications. It also adds utility functions for object manipulation and a constant for limits. Additionally, it restructures the application setup and updates the package metadata. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Contact Created Actions - Create Custom Activity - Opt Out SMS
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/ortto/common/utils.mjs (1)
18-41: Add input validation to parseObjectThe function handles JSON parsing well but could benefit from input validation.
Consider this enhanced implementation:
export const parseObject = (obj) => { if (!obj) return undefined; + if (typeof obj !== 'string' && !Array.isArray(obj) && typeof obj !== 'object') { + return obj; + } if (Array.isArray(obj)) { return obj.map((item) => {components/ortto/actions/opt-out-sms/opt-out-sms.mjs (1)
36-37: Enhance success message with more detailsThe success message could be more informative.
Consider this enhancement:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully opted out SMS for User ID: ${this.userEmail}`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully opted out SMS communications for user: ${this.userEmail}. Updated at: ${new Date().toISOString()}`);components/ortto/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (2)
6-11: Consider incrementing the version numberThe version is set to "0.0.1" which suggests this is the first implementation. However, given that this is implementing a core feature from issue #13209, consider starting with version "1.0.0" to indicate a stable, production-ready release.
43-45: Enhance contact summary formattingThe current summary concatenation could result in multiple spaces when fields are empty. Consider using a more robust approach:
- return `New Contact: ${item.fields["str::first"] || ""} ${item.fields["str::last"] || ""} ${item.fields["str::email"] || ""} `; + const parts = [ + "New Contact:", + item.fields["str::first"], + item.fields["str::last"], + item.fields["str::email"], + ].filter(Boolean); + return parts.join(" ");components/ortto/actions/create-person/create-person.mjs (1)
4-9: Consider starting with version 1.0.0Since this is a production-ready component that other developers will depend on, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate stability and API readiness.
components/ortto/ortto.app.mjs (2)
12-29: Optimize user email options loadingThe options method could be optimized to:
- Cache results to prevent unnecessary API calls
- Add error handling for API failures
async options({ page }) { + try { + if (!this._cachedContacts) { + this._cachedContacts = new Map(); + } + + const cacheKey = `page_${page}`; + if (this._cachedContacts.has(cacheKey)) { + return this._cachedContacts.get(cacheKey); + } + const { contacts } = await this.listPeople({ data: { limit: LIMIT, offset: LIMIT * page, fields: [ "str::first", "str::last", "str::email", ], }, }); - return contacts.map(({ fields }) => ({ + const options = contacts.map(({ fields }) => ({ label: `${fields["str::first"]} ${fields["str::last"]} (${fields["str::email"]})`, value: fields["str::email"], })); + + this._cachedContacts.set(cacheKey, options); + return options; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to load user emails: ${error.message}`); + } },
93-113: Optimize pagination implementationThe current pagination implementation could be improved:
- Add handling for empty responses
- Add memory optimization for large datasets
async *paginate({ fn, data = {}, fieldName, ...opts }) { let hasMore = false; let page = 0; + let totalProcessed = 0; do { data.limit = LIMIT; data.offset = LIMIT * page++; + + try { const response = await fn({ data, ...opts, }); + + if (!response?.[fieldName]?.length) { + break; + } + for (const d of response[fieldName]) { yield d; + totalProcessed++; } hasMore = response.has_more; + + // Optional: Add a circuit breaker for safety + if (totalProcessed > 1000000) { + throw new Error('Pagination limit exceeded'); + } + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Pagination failed: ${error.message}`); + } } while (hasMore); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
components/ortto/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/ortto/actions/create-custom-activity/create-custom-activity.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/actions/create-person/create-person.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/actions/opt-out-sms/opt-out-sms.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/app/ortto.app.ts(0 hunks)components/ortto/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/ortto.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/package.json(1 hunks)components/ortto/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/ortto/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/ortto/.gitignore
- components/ortto/app/ortto.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/ortto/common/constants.mjs
- components/ortto/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/ortto/common/utils.mjs
[error] 11-11: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/ortto/package.json (1)
3-16: Verify version bump rationale
The changes look good, but the version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 suggests significant changes. Please ensure this follows semantic versioning principles given the new Ortto components being added.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump to 0.1.0 is justified
The version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 is appropriate as this appears to be the initial implementation of the Ortto integration with multiple new components:
- 3 new actions: create-custom-activity, create-person, and opt-out-sms
- New source component: new-contact-created
- Common utilities and constants
- Base implementation for sources
This represents a significant feature addition that warrants a minor version bump according to semantic versioning principles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are breaking changes that justify the minor version bump
git diff main -- components/ortto/ | grep -B 2 -A 2 "^[-+]" | grep -v "^[-+]package.json"
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check what files exist in the components/ortto directory
fd . components/ortto/
# Then check the git history for this directory
git log --oneline -- components/ortto/
# Also check if there are any new files added in this PR
git status
Length of output: 1034
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these are new files by trying to find them in the current branch
git ls-tree -r HEAD:components/ortto --name-only
# Also let's check the content of the README to see if it provides any insights about the changes
cat components/ortto/README.md
Length of output: 1977
components/ortto/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1)
20-42: Review and document field identifiers
The field identifiers use shorthand prefixes (str::, phn::, geo::, etc.) which might not be immediately clear to other developers. Consider:
- Adding documentation explaining these prefixes
- Verifying these match Ortto's API specifications
components/ortto/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
41-46:
Fix potential race condition in lastDate update
The current implementation might miss events if multiple instances run simultaneously. Consider using timestamps instead of IDs for tracking:
if (responseArray.length) {
if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) {
responseArray.length = maxResults;
}
- this._setLastDate(responseArray[0].id);
+ this._setLastDate(Date.parse(responseArray[0].fields.c));
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/ortto/ortto.app.mjs (2)
79-85: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate method definition in createPerson
The createPerson method unnecessarily specifies method: "POST" when it's already set in _makeRequest:
createPerson(opts = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
- method: "POST",
path: "/person/merge",
...opts,
});
},Likely invalid or redundant comment.
48-56: Verify API key security measures
Ensure proper handling of API credentials:
- Verify that the API key is properly encrypted in storage
- Consider implementing API key rotation mechanism
✅ Verification successful
API key handling follows secure practices
The implementation follows secure practices for API key handling:
- API key is stored in the auth context (
this.$auth) and not hardcoded - Key is passed securely in headers using HTTPS
- No exposure of credentials in logs or error messages
- Standard header-based authentication using
X-Api-Key
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential API key exposure in other files
rg -i "api[-_]key|apikey" --type js --type ts
# Check for proper auth implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'this.$auth'
Length of output: 67035
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for API key storage and handling patterns
rg -i "api[-_]key|apikey" --type js --type ts -A 5 -B 5 components/ortto/
# Check for auth implementation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
$auth() {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for API key storage and handling patterns in ortto component
rg -i "api[-_]key|apikey" components/ortto/ortto.app.mjs
# Check for auth implementation and headers
rg -i "headers|auth" components/ortto/ortto.app.mjs -A 5 -B 5
# Look for any sensitive data handling patterns
rg -i "sensitive|secret|credentials" components/ortto/
Length of output: 881
| export const clearObj = (obj) => { | ||
| return Object.entries(obj) | ||
| .filter(([ | ||
| , | ||
| v, | ||
| ]) => (v != null && v != "" && JSON.stringify(v) != "{}")) | ||
| .reduce((acc, [ | ||
| k, | ||
| v, | ||
| ]) => ({ | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [k]: (!Array.isArray(v) && v === Object(v)) | ||
| ? clearObj(v) | ||
| : v, | ||
| }), {}); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Performance and safety improvements needed for clearObj
The current implementation has several concerns:
- Using spread operator in reduce causes O(n²) time complexity
- Recursive calls without depth limit could cause stack overflow
- Missing input validation
Consider this safer implementation:
-export const clearObj = (obj) => {
- return Object.entries(obj)
- .filter(([, v]) => (v != null && v != "" && JSON.stringify(v) != "{}"))
- .reduce((acc, [k, v]) => ({
- ...acc,
- [k]: (!Array.isArray(v) && v === Object(v))
- ? clearObj(v)
- : v,
- }), {});
-};
+export const clearObj = (obj, maxDepth = 10) => {
+ if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return obj;
+ if (maxDepth <= 0) return obj;
+
+ const result = {};
+ for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(obj)) {
+ if (v == null || v === "" || JSON.stringify(v) === "{}") continue;
+ result[k] = (!Array.isArray(v) && v === Object(v))
+ ? clearObj(v, maxDepth - 1)
+ : v;
+ }
+ return result;
+};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const clearObj = (obj) => { | |
| return Object.entries(obj) | |
| .filter(([ | |
| , | |
| v, | |
| ]) => (v != null && v != "" && JSON.stringify(v) != "{}")) | |
| .reduce((acc, [ | |
| k, | |
| v, | |
| ]) => ({ | |
| ...acc, | |
| [k]: (!Array.isArray(v) && v === Object(v)) | |
| ? clearObj(v) | |
| : v, | |
| }), {}); | |
| }; | |
| export const clearObj = (obj, maxDepth = 10) => { | |
| if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return obj; | |
| if (maxDepth <= 0) return obj; | |
| const result = {}; | |
| for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(obj)) { | |
| if (v == null || v === "" || JSON.stringify(v) === "{}") continue; | |
| result[k] = (!Array.isArray(v) && v === Object(v)) | |
| ? clearObj(v, maxDepth - 1) | |
| : v; | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| }; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 11-11: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
| const response = await this.ortto.updatePerson({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| people: [ | ||
| { | ||
| fields: { | ||
| "str::email": this.userEmail, | ||
| "bol::sp": false, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| async: false, | ||
| merge_by: [ | ||
| "str::email", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract field names as constants and add response validation
The implementation has hard-coded field names and lacks response validation.
Consider these improvements:
+const FIELD_NAMES = {
+ EMAIL: "str::email",
+ SMS_PREFERENCE: "bol::sp",
+};
+
export default {
// ... existing code ...
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.ortto.updatePerson({
data: {
people: [
{
fields: {
- "str::email": this.userEmail,
- "bol::sp": false,
+ [FIELD_NAMES.EMAIL]: this.userEmail,
+ [FIELD_NAMES.SMS_PREFERENCE]: false,
},
},
],
async: false,
merge_by: [
- "str::email",
+ FIELD_NAMES.EMAIL,
],
},
});
+
+ if (!response?.success) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to opt out SMS: ${response?.message || 'Unknown error'}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.ortto.updatePerson({ | |
| data: { | |
| people: [ | |
| { | |
| fields: { | |
| "str::email": this.userEmail, | |
| "bol::sp": false, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| async: false, | |
| merge_by: [ | |
| "str::email", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const FIELD_NAMES = { | |
| EMAIL: "str::email", | |
| SMS_PREFERENCE: "bol::sp", | |
| }; | |
| const response = await this.ortto.updatePerson({ | |
| data: { | |
| people: [ | |
| { | |
| fields: { | |
| [FIELD_NAMES.EMAIL]: this.userEmail, | |
| [FIELD_NAMES.SMS_PREFERENCE]: false, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| async: false, | |
| merge_by: [ | |
| FIELD_NAMES.EMAIL, | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.success) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to opt out SMS: ${response?.message || 'Unknown error'}`); | |
| } |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.ortto.createCustomActivity({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| "activities": [ | ||
| { | ||
| activity_id: this.activityId, | ||
| attributes: parseObject(this.attributes), | ||
| fields: parseObject(this.fields), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| "merge_by": [ | ||
| "str::email", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and input validation
The run method lacks error handling and input validation. Consider:
- Validating required fields before API call
- Adding try-catch block for API errors
- Verifying response structure
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.activityId) {
+ throw new Error("Activity ID is required");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.ortto.createCustomActivity({
$,
data: {
"activities": [
{
activity_id: this.activityId,
attributes: parseObject(this.attributes),
fields: parseObject(this.fields),
},
],
"merge_by": [
"str::email",
],
},
});
+
+ if (!response?.success) {
+ throw new Error("Failed to create activity: " + response?.error || "Unknown error");
+ }
+
+ $.export("$summary", "Successfully created activity");
+ return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Error creating custom activity: ${error.message}`);
+ }
-
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created activity");
- return response;
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.ortto.createCustomActivity({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| "activities": [ | |
| { | |
| activity_id: this.activityId, | |
| attributes: parseObject(this.attributes), | |
| fields: parseObject(this.fields), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| "merge_by": [ | |
| "str::email", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.activityId) { | |
| throw new Error("Activity ID is required"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.ortto.createCustomActivity({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| "activities": [ | |
| { | |
| activity_id: this.activityId, | |
| attributes: parseObject(this.attributes), | |
| fields: parseObject(this.fields), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| "merge_by": [ | |
| "str::email", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.success) { | |
| throw new Error("Failed to create activity: " + response?.error || "Unknown error"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully created activity"); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Error creating custom activity: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| async emitEvent(maxResults = false) { | ||
| const lastDate = this._getLastDate(); | ||
|
|
||
| const response = this.ortto.paginate({ | ||
| fn: this.getFunction(), | ||
| fieldName: this.getFieldName(), | ||
| data: { | ||
| "fields": this.getFields(), | ||
| "sort_by_field_id": "c", | ||
| "sort_order": "desc", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| let responseArray = []; | ||
| for await (const item of response) { | ||
| if (Date.parse(item.fields.c) <= lastDate) break; | ||
| responseArray.push(item); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize pagination and memory usage
The current implementation loads all items into memory before filtering. Consider:
- Adding a limit to prevent memory issues
- Using the API's filtering capabilities if available
- Adding error handling for the pagination
async emitEvent(maxResults = false) {
const lastDate = this._getLastDate();
+ const SAFE_BATCH_SIZE = 1000;
+ let count = 0;
+ try {
const response = this.ortto.paginate({
fn: this.getFunction(),
fieldName: this.getFieldName(),
data: {
"fields": this.getFields(),
"sort_by_field_id": "c",
"sort_order": "desc",
+ "limit": SAFE_BATCH_SIZE,
},
});
let responseArray = [];
for await (const item of response) {
+ count++;
if (Date.parse(item.fields.c) <= lastDate) break;
responseArray.push(item);
+ if (maxResults && responseArray.length >= maxResults) break;
+ if (count >= SAFE_BATCH_SIZE) break;
}
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Error during pagination:", error);
+ throw new Error(`Failed to fetch items: ${error.message}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async emitEvent(maxResults = false) { | |
| const lastDate = this._getLastDate(); | |
| const response = this.ortto.paginate({ | |
| fn: this.getFunction(), | |
| fieldName: this.getFieldName(), | |
| data: { | |
| "fields": this.getFields(), | |
| "sort_by_field_id": "c", | |
| "sort_order": "desc", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| let responseArray = []; | |
| for await (const item of response) { | |
| if (Date.parse(item.fields.c) <= lastDate) break; | |
| responseArray.push(item); | |
| } | |
| async emitEvent(maxResults = false) { | |
| const lastDate = this._getLastDate(); | |
| const SAFE_BATCH_SIZE = 1000; | |
| let count = 0; | |
| try { | |
| const response = this.ortto.paginate({ | |
| fn: this.getFunction(), | |
| fieldName: this.getFieldName(), | |
| data: { | |
| "fields": this.getFields(), | |
| "sort_by_field_id": "c", | |
| "sort_order": "desc", | |
| "limit": SAFE_BATCH_SIZE, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| let responseArray = []; | |
| for await (const item of response) { | |
| count++; | |
| if (Date.parse(item.fields.c) <= lastDate) break; | |
| responseArray.push(item); | |
| if (maxResults && responseArray.length >= maxResults) break; | |
| if (count >= SAFE_BATCH_SIZE) break; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error during pagination:", error); | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to fetch items: ${error.message}`); | |
| } |
| for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) { | ||
| this.$emit(item, { | ||
| id: item.id, | ||
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | ||
| ts: Date.parse(item.fields.c || new Date()), | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for event emission
The event emission process lacks error handling and could fail silently:
- for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) {
- this.$emit(item, {
- id: item.id,
- summary: this.getSummary(item),
- ts: Date.parse(item.fields.c || new Date()),
- });
- }
+ try {
+ for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) {
+ const timestamp = Date.parse(item.fields.c || new Date());
+ if (isNaN(timestamp)) {
+ console.warn(`Invalid timestamp for item ${item.id}`);
+ continue;
+ }
+ await this.$emit(item, {
+ id: item.id,
+ summary: this.getSummary(item),
+ ts: timestamp,
+ });
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Error emitting events:", error);
+ throw new Error(`Failed to emit events: ${error.message}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) { | |
| this.$emit(item, { | |
| id: item.id, | |
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | |
| ts: Date.parse(item.fields.c || new Date()), | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| for (const item of responseArray.reverse()) { | |
| const timestamp = Date.parse(item.fields.c || new Date()); | |
| if (isNaN(timestamp)) { | |
| console.warn(`Invalid timestamp for item ${item.id}`); | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| await this.$emit(item, { | |
| id: item.id, | |
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | |
| ts: timestamp, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error emitting events:", error); | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to emit events: ${error.message}`); | |
| } |
| phone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Phone", | ||
| description: "The person's phone number.", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for phone and birthday fields
- The phone field should include format validation to ensure valid phone numbers.
- The birthday field is accepted as string but used as Date - consider:
- Adding format validation (e.g., ISO 8601)
- Using a more specific type or adding format description
Consider adding these validations:
phone: {
type: "string",
label: "Phone",
description: "The person's phone number.",
+ pattern: "^\\+?[1-9]\\d{1,14}$",
+ description: "The person's phone number in E.164 format (e.g., +1234567890).",
},
...
birthday: {
type: "string",
label: "Birthday",
- description: "The person's birth date.",
+ description: "The person's birth date in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD).",
+ pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$",
optional: true,
},Also applies to: 52-57
| const birthday = {}; | ||
| if (props.birthday) { | ||
| const date = new Date(props.birthday); | ||
| birthday.day = date.getDate(); | ||
| birthday.month = date.getMonth() + 1; | ||
| birthday.year = date.getFullYear(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for invalid date parsing
The current implementation assumes the date string will always be valid. Add error handling to prevent runtime errors:
const birthday = {};
if (props.birthday) {
+ try {
const date = new Date(props.birthday);
+ if (isNaN(date.getTime())) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid date format");
+ }
birthday.day = date.getDate();
birthday.month = date.getMonth() + 1;
birthday.year = date.getFullYear();
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Invalid birthday format: ${error.message}`);
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const birthday = {}; | |
| if (props.birthday) { | |
| const date = new Date(props.birthday); | |
| birthday.day = date.getDate(); | |
| birthday.month = date.getMonth() + 1; | |
| birthday.year = date.getFullYear(); | |
| } | |
| const birthday = {}; | |
| if (props.birthday) { | |
| try { | |
| const date = new Date(props.birthday); | |
| if (isNaN(date.getTime())) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid date format"); | |
| } | |
| birthday.day = date.getDate(); | |
| birthday.month = date.getMonth() + 1; | |
| birthday.year = date.getFullYear(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Invalid birthday format: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| } |
| const response = await ortto.createPerson({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| people: [ | ||
| { | ||
| fields: clearObj({ | ||
| "str::first": props.firstName, | ||
| "str::last": props.lastName, | ||
| "phn::phone": { | ||
| "phone": props.phone, | ||
| "parse_with_country_code": true, | ||
| }, | ||
| "str::email": props.email, | ||
| "geo::city": { | ||
| name: props.city, | ||
| }, | ||
| "geo::country": { | ||
| name: props.country, | ||
| }, | ||
| "geo::region": { | ||
| name: props.region, | ||
| }, | ||
| "dtz::b": birthday, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| async: false, | ||
| merge_by: [ | ||
| "str::email", | ||
| ], | ||
| find_strategy: 0, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Person successfully initialized or updated!"); | ||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for API response
The current implementation doesn't handle potential API errors. Consider adding try-catch and response validation:
- const response = await ortto.createPerson({
- data: {
- people: [
- {
- fields: clearObj({
+ try {
+ const response = await ortto.createPerson({
+ data: {
+ people: [
+ {
+ fields: clearObj({
...
- },
- });
- $.export("$summary", "Person successfully initialized or updated!");
- return response;
+ },
+ });
+
+ if (!response || response.error) {
+ throw new Error(response?.error || 'Failed to create/update person');
+ }
+
+ $.export("$summary", "Person successfully initialized or updated!");
+ return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create/update person: ${error.message}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await ortto.createPerson({ | |
| data: { | |
| people: [ | |
| { | |
| fields: clearObj({ | |
| "str::first": props.firstName, | |
| "str::last": props.lastName, | |
| "phn::phone": { | |
| "phone": props.phone, | |
| "parse_with_country_code": true, | |
| }, | |
| "str::email": props.email, | |
| "geo::city": { | |
| name: props.city, | |
| }, | |
| "geo::country": { | |
| name: props.country, | |
| }, | |
| "geo::region": { | |
| name: props.region, | |
| }, | |
| "dtz::b": birthday, | |
| }), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| async: false, | |
| merge_by: [ | |
| "str::email", | |
| ], | |
| find_strategy: 0, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", "Person successfully initialized or updated!"); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| try { | |
| const response = await ortto.createPerson({ | |
| data: { | |
| people: [ | |
| { | |
| fields: clearObj({ | |
| "str::first": props.firstName, | |
| "str::last": props.lastName, | |
| "phn::phone": { | |
| "phone": props.phone, | |
| "parse_with_country_code": true, | |
| }, | |
| "str::email": props.email, | |
| "geo::city": { | |
| name: props.city, | |
| }, | |
| "geo::country": { | |
| name: props.country, | |
| }, | |
| "geo::region": { | |
| name: props.region, | |
| }, | |
| "dtz::b": birthday, | |
| }), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| async: false, | |
| merge_by: [ | |
| "str::email", | |
| ], | |
| find_strategy: 0, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response || response.error) { | |
| throw new Error(response?.error || 'Failed to create/update person'); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", "Person successfully initialized or updated!"); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to create/update person: ${error.message}`); | |
| } |
| _makeRequest({ | ||
| $ = this, path, ...opts | ||
| }) { | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: this._headers(), | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add request timeout and retry logic
The _makeRequest method should include timeout and retry logic for better reliability:
_makeRequest({
- $ = this, path, ...opts
+ $ = this,
+ path,
+ timeout = 30000,
+ retries = 3,
+ ...opts
}) {
- return axios($, {
- method: "POST",
- url: this._baseUrl() + path,
- headers: this._headers(),
- ...opts,
- });
+ const makeAttempt = async (attempt) => {
+ try {
+ return await axios($, {
+ method: "POST",
+ url: this._baseUrl() + path,
+ headers: this._headers(),
+ timeout,
+ ...opts,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (attempt < retries && error.response?.status >= 500) {
+ await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000 * attempt));
+ return makeAttempt(attempt + 1);
+ }
+ throw error;
+ }
+ };
+ return makeAttempt(1);
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, path, ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| method: "POST", | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(), | |
| ...opts, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| timeout = 30000, | |
| retries = 3, | |
| ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| const makeAttempt = async (attempt) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await axios($, { | |
| method: "POST", | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(), | |
| timeout, | |
| ...opts, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (attempt < retries && error.response?.status >= 500) { | |
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000 * attempt)); | |
| return makeAttempt(attempt + 1); | |
| } | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| return makeAttempt(1); | |
| }, |
Resolves #13209.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update