-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Components] favro #13271 #14740
[Components] favro #13271 #14740
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the introduction and modification of several modules within the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1)
19-24
: Add error handlingConsider adding try-catch block for better error handling and user feedback.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.listUsers({ $, organizationId: this.organizationId, }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list users: ${error.message}`); + }components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (3)
1-9
: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The action definition looks good with proper naming and versioning. The documentation link is correctly included.
Consider adding more context to the description, such as required permissions or the effect of creating a new organization:
- description: "Creates a new organization. [See the documentation](https://favro.com/developer/#create-an-organization)", + description: "Creates a new organization and shares it with a specified user. Requires appropriate permissions. [See the documentation](https://favro.com/developer/#create-an-organization)",
17-24
: Remove extra newline in description.There's an unnecessary newline in the organizationId prop definition.
organizationId: { propDefinition: [ app, "organizationId", ], description: "Organization of the user that will be associated to the new organization", - },
42-59
: Consider adding error handling.The run method should include try-catch block to handle potential API errors gracefully and provide meaningful error messages to users.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.createOrganization({ $, data: { name: this.name, shareToUsers: [ { userId: this.userId, role: this.role, }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created organization named ${this.name}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to create organization: ${error.message}`); + } },components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (1)
23-37
: Consider supporting multiple user assignmentsThe current implementation only allows sharing the organization with a single user. Consider modifying the props to support multiple user assignments for better flexibility.
Example approach:
- userId: { + users: { propDefinition: [ app, - "userId", + "users", (c) => ({ organizationId: c.organizationId, }), ], + type: "string[]", }, - role: { + roles: { propDefinition: [ app, - "role", + "roles", ], + type: "string[]", },components/favro/favro.app.mjs (3)
14-14
: Fix misleading variable nameThe variable
usersIds
contains organization data, not user IDs. This makes the code confusing to read.-const usersIds = response.entities; +const organizations = response.entities;
8-22
: Consider adding required field validationThe prop definitions should indicate which fields are required for API operations. Consider adding the
required
property to mandatory fields.organizationId: { type: "string", label: "Organization ID", description: "ID of the organization", + required: true, async options() { ... }, },
Also applies to: 23-39, 40-44, 45-50
53-55
: Consider making the base URL configurableThe API base URL is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or app settings to support different environments (e.g., staging).
_baseUrl() { - return "https://favro.com/api"; + return this.$auth.base_url || "https://favro.com/api"; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/favro/.gitignore
(0 hunks)components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/app/favro.app.ts
(0 hunks)components/favro/common/contants.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/favro.app.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/package.json
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/favro/.gitignore
- components/favro/app/favro.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/favro/common/contants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/favro/package.json (4)
10-12
: LGTM: Files array remains functionally unchanged
The files array formatting change maintains the same functionality while improving readability.
18-20
: Verify @pipedream/platform dependency version
The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency looks good, but let's ensure the version constraint is appropriate.
✅ Verification successful
Version constraint for @pipedream/platform is consistent
The version ^3.0.3
is widely used across many components in the codebase and matches the latest published version on npm. This indicates proper version alignment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other components using @pipedream/platform to ensure version consistency
rg '"@pipedream/platform":\s*"\^3\.0\.3"' components/*/package.json
# Check the latest version available
npm view @pipedream/platform version
Length of output: 82909
5-5
: Verify build configuration for new main entry point
The main entry point has changed from dist/app/favro.app.mjs
to favro.app.mjs
. Ensure that:
- Build scripts are updated accordingly
- The new path is correct and the file exists
✅ Verification successful
Main entry point change is valid and properly configured
The new main entry point favro.app.mjs
exists in the correct location and the change in package.json is valid. The component appears to be a simple module without complex build configuration, as:
- The file
favro.app.mjs
exists directly in the component root - No build configuration files (webpack/rollup/tsconfig) are present
- No build scripts are defined in package.json
- The module follows a straightforward structure with actions and common directories
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the new main entry point
ls -l components/favro/favro.app.mjs
# Check for any build configuration files
ls -l components/favro/tsconfig*.json components/favro/rollup*.js components/favro/webpack*.js 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any build-related scripts in package.json
cat components/favro/package.json | jq -r '.scripts // empty'
# Look for any build-related files in the component directory
ls -la components/favro/
# Search for any import/require of this component in the codebase
rg -l "favro.app" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 564
3-3
: Verify if version bump to 0.1.0 is appropriate
The version change from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 suggests potentially breaking changes. Please ensure this aligns with semantic versioning principles based on the nature of changes in the new Favro organization/user management features.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump to 0.1.0 appears appropriate
The version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 is justified as this appears to be a feature release introducing new functionality:
- New actions added: create-organization, list-users, and update-organization
- The changes represent new features rather than breaking changes to existing functionality
- The directory structure shows a well-organized addition of new capabilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for breaking changes in the codebase
# Look for removed or significantly modified files
git diff --name-status main... | grep "^D\|^R" | grep "components/favro"
# Check for changes in exported methods
rg "export (default |const |function )" --type js components/favro/
Length of output: 330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for breaking changes
# 1. Check the git history for the specific file
git log -p components/favro/package.json
# 2. Look for any API changes in the component
fd . components/favro/ -e js -x cat {} \; | rg "^export"
# 3. Check if there are any deleted files in the PR
git status --porcelain | grep "^D"
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try one final approach focusing on current state
# 1. Check current exports in the component
find components/favro/ -type f -name "*.js" -exec cat {} \; | grep "^export"
# 2. Check the contents of the package.json
cat components/favro/package.json
# 3. List all files in the component directory to understand structure
ls -R components/favro/
Length of output: 968
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (3)
4-8
: Verify component key format
The component structure looks good, but let's ensure the component key follows Pipedream's naming convention.
✅ Verification successful
Component key format is consistent with other Favro components
The component key "favro-list-users" follows the same naming pattern as other Favro components in the codebase:
- favro-create-organization
- favro-list-users
- favro-post-upsate-organization
All keys use lowercase, hyphen-separated format prefixed with "favro-", which is consistent with Pipedream's component standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Favro components follow the same key format
# Search for other Favro component keys
rg -l "key: \"favro-" components/favro/
Length of output: 229
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual key format in these files to ensure consistency
rg "key: \"favro-" components/favro/ -A 2
Length of output: 1184
11-16
: Verify organizationId propDefinition
Let's ensure the organizationId propDefinition exists in the app file.
✅ Verification successful
organizationId propDefinition exists and is properly implemented
The organizationId
propDefinition is correctly defined in favro.app.mjs
with:
- Proper type definition as string
- Clear label and description
- Async options method to dynamically fetch organization IDs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify organizationId propDefinition in app file
# Search for organizationId propDefinition in app file
ast-grep --pattern 'organizationId: {
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the organizationId propDefinition
# First, let's check if the file exists
fd "favro.app.mjs" components/favro
# Then let's look at its content focusing on prop definitions
rg -A 5 "propDefinitions" components/favro/favro.app.mjs
# Also search specifically for organizationId with context
rg -A 5 "organizationId" components/favro/favro.app.mjs
Length of output: 1368
19-28
: Verify app method and response structure
The implementation looks good, but let's verify two aspects:
- The existence of the listUsers method in the app
- The response structure assumption (response.entities)
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified and consistent with app structure
The implementation is correct as:
- The
listUsers
method exists in the app and is properly implemented - The response structure using
response.entities
is consistent with other usages in the codebase, particularly infavro.app.mjs
- The summary message follows the same pattern as other similar implementations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify app method and response structure
# Search for listUsers method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'listUsers({$_}) {
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
# Search for response structure usage in other files
rg "response\.entities\.length" components/favro/
Length of output: 270
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the app method with a broader pattern and check the response structure
# Search for any listUsers method or property
rg -A 5 "listUsers" components/favro/favro.app.mjs
# Check if there are any other files using similar response structure
rg "\.entities" components/favro/
Length of output: 703
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (1)
9-40
: Verify prop definitions in app file.
All props reference definitions from the app file. Let's verify their existence and proper implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the prop definitions.
All prop definitions are correctly implemented in the app file
The verification shows that all required prop definitions (name
, organizationId
, userId
, and role
) are properly implemented in favro.app.mjs
with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and options where needed. The implementation matches the usage in the create-organization action.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all referenced prop definitions exist in the app file
# Expected: Find definitions for name, organizationId, userId, and role
echo "Checking for prop definitions in favro.app.mjs:"
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
$$$
name: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
$$$
organizationId: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
$$$
userId: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
$$$
role: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs
Length of output: 556
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the app file directly
echo "Checking favro.app.mjs content:"
rg "propDefinitions" -A 50 components/favro/favro.app.mjs
# Also check if the file exists
ls -l components/favro/favro.app.mjs
Length of output: 1476
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1)
71-103
: Consider extracting API version to a constant
The API version "v1" is hardcoded in multiple endpoints. Consider extracting it to a constant to make version updates easier to manage.
+const API_VERSION = "v1";
+
async createOrganization(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
- path: "/v1/organizations",
+ path: `/${API_VERSION}/organizations`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
}
Also, consider adding input validation for required parameters in these methods to fail fast with clear error messages.
Let's check the API documentation to verify the required parameters:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for API version usage across the codebase to verify if extracting it as a constant would be beneficial.
API version constant extraction would be beneficial
Based on the search results, I can see that "/v1/" is consistently used across multiple endpoints in the Favro app (/v1/organizations
, /v1/users
). Extracting this to a constant would indeed make version updates easier to manage and maintain consistency.
- The change would affect the following endpoints in
favro.app.mjs
:/v1/organizations
(used in createOrganization, updateOrganization, listOrganizations)/v1/users
(used in listUsers)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint documentation in markdown files
rg -t md "organizations|users" --glob "**/{README,API,docs}*"
Length of output: 100528
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API version patterns in paths across the codebase
rg -g '*.{js,mjs,ts}' '"/v\d+/' --no-filename
# Also check for any existing API version constants
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $"v1"'
Length of output: 4645
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
…on.mjs Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
…on.mjs Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
…on.mjs Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1)
31-31
: Rename variable 'usersIds' to 'users' for clarityWhen listing users, the variable
usersIds
may cause confusion. Renaming it tousers
enhances clarity and better represents the content.Apply this diff to update the variable name:
- const usersIds = response.entities; - return usersIds.map(({ + const users = response.entities; + return users.map(({components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1)
20-29
: Consider adding error handling in therun
methodTo ensure robustness, wrap the API call in a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions and provide informative error messages.
Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.listUsers({ $, organizationId: this.organizationId, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.entities.length} user(s)`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list users: ${error.message}`); + } },components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (2)
24-25
: Remove extra blank lines to adhere to coding standardsThere are unnecessary blank lines that violate the project's code style guidelines. Removing them improves code readability.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
Also applies to: 59-60
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 24-25: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 24-24:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
43-61
: Add error handling in therun
methodIncluding error handling ensures that any issues during the API call are caught and appropriate feedback is provided.
Apply this diff to implement error handling:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.createOrganization({ $, data: { name: this.name, shareToUsers: [ { userId: this.userId, role: this.role, }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created organization named ${this.name}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to create organization: ${error.message}`); + } },🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 59-60: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 59-59:
More than 1 blank line not allowedcomponents/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (2)
40-62
: Enhance error handling and success message in therun
methodAdding error handling improves reliability, and providing a more detailed success message enhances user feedback.
Apply this diff to implement the improvements:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.updateOrganization({ $, organizationId: this.organizationId, data: { name: this.name, shareToUsers: [ { userId: this.userId, role: this.role, }, ], }, }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated organization with ID '${this.organizationId}'`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated organization '${this.name}' (ID: ${this.organizationId})`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to update organization: ${error.message}`); + } },🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
58-59
: Remove extra blank line to comply with coding standardsAn unnecessary blank line is present, which goes against the project's code style guidelines. Removing it enhances code readability.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/favro.app.mjs
(1 hunks)components/favro/package.json
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/favro/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
[error] 24-25: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
[error] 59-60: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs
[failure] 24-24:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
[failure] 59-59:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs
[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (2)
66-67
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary template literals from authentication credentials
The template literals in username
and password
are unnecessary. Directly using the variables prevents potential issues and simplifies the code.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
auth: {
- username: `${this.$auth.username}`,
- password: `${this.$auth.api_token}`,
+ username: this.$auth.username,
+ password: this.$auth.api_token,
},
56-70
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to the _makeRequest
method
The _makeRequest
method lacks error handling, which can lead to unhandled exceptions. Wrap the request in a try-catch block to provide meaningful error messages and improve reliability.
Apply this diff to implement error handling:
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
const {
$ = this,
path,
...otherOpts
} = opts;
+ try {
return await axios($, {
...otherOpts,
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
auth: {
username: this.$auth.username,
password: this.$auth.api_token,
},
});
+ } catch (err) {
+ throw new Error(`Favro API request failed: ${err.message}`);
+ }
},
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
.gitignore
file to streamline version control.Documentation
package.json
to reflect version changes and new dependencies.Chores