Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Components] favro #13271 #14740

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

[Components] favro #13271 #14740

merged 11 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia lcaresia commented Nov 26, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced actions for creating, updating, and listing organizations and users within the Favro application.
    • Added a constants file for predefined user roles.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed obsolete .gitignore file to streamline version control.
  • Documentation

    • Updated package.json to reflect version changes and new dependencies.
  • Chores

    • Restructured application files for improved organization and clarity.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 26, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 4, 2024 0:35am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 4, 2024 0:35am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 4, 2024 0:35am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d60185 and 12b704f.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the introduction and modification of several modules within the favro component. New modules for creating, updating, and listing organizations and users have been added, along with a new constants file for user roles. The existing .gitignore and app definition files have been removed, and the package.json has been updated with a new version, main entry point, and dependency.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/favro/.gitignore Deleted file that ignored .js, .mjs files and the dist directory.
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs New module for creating organizations with properties and an asynchronous run method.
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs New module for listing users within an organization with a run method that retrieves user data.
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs New module for updating organizations with properties and an asynchronous run method.
components/favro/app/favro.app.ts Deleted file that defined the application without any properties or error handling.
components/favro/common/constants.mjs New file exporting USER_ROLES, an array of predefined user roles.
components/favro/favro.app.mjs New module for API interactions, defining properties and methods for managing organizations and users.
components/favro/package.json Updated version from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0, changed main entry point, reformatted files array, and added a new dependency.

Suggested labels

action, bug

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

🐇 In the land where the Favro hops,
New actions bloom, and the old one stops.
With users listed and roles defined,
A cleaner path for all to find.
So let us cheer with a joyful thump,
For changes made, let’s give a jump! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lcaresia lcaresia linked an issue Nov 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1)

19-24: Add error handling

Consider adding try-catch block for better error handling and user feedback.

   async run({ $ }) {
+    try {
       const response = await this.app.listUsers({
         $,
         organizationId: this.organizationId,
       });
+    } catch (error) {
+      throw new Error(`Failed to list users: ${error.message}`);
+    }
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (3)

1-9: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.

The action definition looks good with proper naming and versioning. The documentation link is correctly included.

Consider adding more context to the description, such as required permissions or the effect of creating a new organization:

-  description: "Creates a new organization. [See the documentation](https://favro.com/developer/#create-an-organization)",
+  description: "Creates a new organization and shares it with a specified user. Requires appropriate permissions. [See the documentation](https://favro.com/developer/#create-an-organization)",

17-24: Remove extra newline in description.

There's an unnecessary newline in the organizationId prop definition.

    organizationId: {
      propDefinition: [
        app,
        "organizationId",
      ],
      description: "Organization of the user that will be associated to the new organization",
-

    },

42-59: Consider adding error handling.

The run method should include try-catch block to handle potential API errors gracefully and provide meaningful error messages to users.

   async run({ $ }) {
+    try {
       const response = await this.app.createOrganization({
         $,
         data: {
           name: this.name,
           shareToUsers: [
             {
               userId: this.userId,
               role: this.role,
             },
           ],
         },
       });

       $.export("$summary", `Successfully created organization named ${this.name}`);

       return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      throw new Error(`Failed to create organization: ${error.message}`);
+    }
   },
components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (1)

23-37: Consider supporting multiple user assignments

The current implementation only allows sharing the organization with a single user. Consider modifying the props to support multiple user assignments for better flexibility.

Example approach:

-    userId: {
+    users: {
       propDefinition: [
         app,
-        "userId",
+        "users",
         (c) => ({
           organizationId: c.organizationId,
         }),
       ],
+      type: "string[]",
     },
-    role: {
+    roles: {
       propDefinition: [
         app,
-        "role",
+        "roles",
       ],
+      type: "string[]",
     },
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (3)

14-14: Fix misleading variable name

The variable usersIds contains organization data, not user IDs. This makes the code confusing to read.

-const usersIds = response.entities;
+const organizations = response.entities;

8-22: Consider adding required field validation

The prop definitions should indicate which fields are required for API operations. Consider adding the required property to mandatory fields.

organizationId: {
  type: "string",
  label: "Organization ID",
  description: "ID of the organization",
+ required: true,
  async options() {
    ...
  },
},

Also applies to: 23-39, 40-44, 45-50


53-55: Consider making the base URL configurable

The API base URL is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or app settings to support different environments (e.g., staging).

_baseUrl() {
-  return "https://favro.com/api";
+  return this.$auth.base_url || "https://favro.com/api";
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f75543 and 2cb8220.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • components/favro/.gitignore (0 hunks)
  • components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/app/favro.app.ts (0 hunks)
  • components/favro/common/contants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • components/favro/.gitignore
  • components/favro/app/favro.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/favro/common/contants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/favro/package.json (4)

10-12: LGTM: Files array remains functionally unchanged

The files array formatting change maintains the same functionality while improving readability.


18-20: Verify @pipedream/platform dependency version

The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency looks good, but let's ensure the version constraint is appropriate.

✅ Verification successful

Version constraint for @pipedream/platform is consistent

The version ^3.0.3 is widely used across many components in the codebase and matches the latest published version on npm. This indicates proper version alignment.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other components using @pipedream/platform to ensure version consistency
rg '"@pipedream/platform":\s*"\^3\.0\.3"' components/*/package.json

# Check the latest version available
npm view @pipedream/platform version

Length of output: 82909


5-5: Verify build configuration for new main entry point

The main entry point has changed from dist/app/favro.app.mjs to favro.app.mjs. Ensure that:

  1. Build scripts are updated accordingly
  2. The new path is correct and the file exists
✅ Verification successful

Main entry point change is valid and properly configured

The new main entry point favro.app.mjs exists in the correct location and the change in package.json is valid. The component appears to be a simple module without complex build configuration, as:

  • The file favro.app.mjs exists directly in the component root
  • No build configuration files (webpack/rollup/tsconfig) are present
  • No build scripts are defined in package.json
  • The module follows a straightforward structure with actions and common directories
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the new main entry point
ls -l components/favro/favro.app.mjs

# Check for any build configuration files
ls -l components/favro/tsconfig*.json components/favro/rollup*.js components/favro/webpack*.js 2>/dev/null

Length of output: 221


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any build-related scripts in package.json
cat components/favro/package.json | jq -r '.scripts // empty'

# Look for any build-related files in the component directory
ls -la components/favro/

# Search for any import/require of this component in the codebase
rg -l "favro.app" --type js --type ts

Length of output: 564


3-3: Verify if version bump to 0.1.0 is appropriate

The version change from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 suggests potentially breaking changes. Please ensure this aligns with semantic versioning principles based on the nature of changes in the new Favro organization/user management features.

✅ Verification successful

Version bump to 0.1.0 appears appropriate

The version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 is justified as this appears to be a feature release introducing new functionality:

  • New actions added: create-organization, list-users, and update-organization
  • The changes represent new features rather than breaking changes to existing functionality
  • The directory structure shows a well-organized addition of new capabilities
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for breaking changes in the codebase
# Look for removed or significantly modified files
git diff --name-status main... | grep "^D\|^R" | grep "components/favro"

# Check for changes in exported methods
rg "export (default |const |function )" --type js components/favro/

Length of output: 330


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for breaking changes

# 1. Check the git history for the specific file
git log -p components/favro/package.json

# 2. Look for any API changes in the component
fd . components/favro/ -e js -x cat {} \; | rg "^export"

# 3. Check if there are any deleted files in the PR
git status --porcelain | grep "^D"

Length of output: 98


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try one final approach focusing on current state

# 1. Check current exports in the component
find components/favro/ -type f -name "*.js" -exec cat {} \; | grep "^export"

# 2. Check the contents of the package.json
cat components/favro/package.json

# 3. List all files in the component directory to understand structure
ls -R components/favro/

Length of output: 968

components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (3)

4-8: Verify component key format

The component structure looks good, but let's ensure the component key follows Pipedream's naming convention.

✅ Verification successful

Component key format is consistent with other Favro components

The component key "favro-list-users" follows the same naming pattern as other Favro components in the codebase:

  • favro-create-organization
  • favro-list-users
  • favro-post-upsate-organization

All keys use lowercase, hyphen-separated format prefixed with "favro-", which is consistent with Pipedream's component standards.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Favro components follow the same key format

# Search for other Favro component keys
rg -l "key: \"favro-" components/favro/

Length of output: 229


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual key format in these files to ensure consistency
rg "key: \"favro-" components/favro/ -A 2

Length of output: 1184


11-16: Verify organizationId propDefinition

Let's ensure the organizationId propDefinition exists in the app file.

✅ Verification successful

organizationId propDefinition exists and is properly implemented

The organizationId propDefinition is correctly defined in favro.app.mjs with:

  • Proper type definition as string
  • Clear label and description
  • Async options method to dynamically fetch organization IDs
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify organizationId propDefinition in app file

# Search for organizationId propDefinition in app file
ast-grep --pattern 'organizationId: {
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the organizationId propDefinition
# First, let's check if the file exists
fd "favro.app.mjs" components/favro

# Then let's look at its content focusing on prop definitions
rg -A 5 "propDefinitions" components/favro/favro.app.mjs

# Also search specifically for organizationId with context
rg -A 5 "organizationId" components/favro/favro.app.mjs

Length of output: 1368


19-28: Verify app method and response structure

The implementation looks good, but let's verify two aspects:

  1. The existence of the listUsers method in the app
  2. The response structure assumption (response.entities)
✅ Verification successful

Implementation verified and consistent with app structure

The implementation is correct as:

  • The listUsers method exists in the app and is properly implemented
  • The response structure using response.entities is consistent with other usages in the codebase, particularly in favro.app.mjs
  • The summary message follows the same pattern as other similar implementations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify app method and response structure

# Search for listUsers method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'listUsers({$_}) {
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

# Search for response structure usage in other files
rg "response\.entities\.length" components/favro/

Length of output: 270


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the app method with a broader pattern and check the response structure
# Search for any listUsers method or property
rg -A 5 "listUsers" components/favro/favro.app.mjs

# Check if there are any other files using similar response structure
rg "\.entities" components/favro/

Length of output: 703

components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (1)

9-40: Verify prop definitions in app file.

All props reference definitions from the app file. Let's verify their existence and proper implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the prop definitions.


All prop definitions are correctly implemented in the app file

The verification shows that all required prop definitions (name, organizationId, userId, and role) are properly implemented in favro.app.mjs with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and options where needed. The implementation matches the usage in the create-organization action.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all referenced prop definitions exist in the app file
# Expected: Find definitions for name, organizationId, userId, and role

echo "Checking for prop definitions in favro.app.mjs:"
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
  $$$
  name: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
  $$$
  organizationId: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
  $$$
  userId: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {
  $$$
  role: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' components/favro/favro.app.mjs

Length of output: 556


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the app file directly
echo "Checking favro.app.mjs content:"
rg "propDefinitions" -A 50 components/favro/favro.app.mjs

# Also check if the file exists
ls -l components/favro/favro.app.mjs

Length of output: 1476

components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1)

71-103: Consider extracting API version to a constant

The API version "v1" is hardcoded in multiple endpoints. Consider extracting it to a constant to make version updates easier to manage.

+const API_VERSION = "v1";
+
 async createOrganization(args = {}) {
   return this._makeRequest({
-    path: "/v1/organizations",
+    path: `/${API_VERSION}/organizations`,
     method: "post",
     ...args,
   });
 }

Also, consider adding input validation for required parameters in these methods to fail fast with clear error messages.

Let's check the API documentation to verify the required parameters:

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for API version usage across the codebase to verify if extracting it as a constant would be beneficial.


API version constant extraction would be beneficial

Based on the search results, I can see that "/v1/" is consistently used across multiple endpoints in the Favro app (/v1/organizations, /v1/users). Extracting this to a constant would indeed make version updates easier to manage and maintain consistency.

  • The change would affect the following endpoints in favro.app.mjs:
    • /v1/organizations (used in createOrganization, updateOrganization, listOrganizations)
    • /v1/users (used in listUsers)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint documentation in markdown files
rg -t md "organizations|users" --glob "**/{README,API,docs}*"

Length of output: 100528


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API version patterns in paths across the codebase
rg -g '*.{js,mjs,ts}' '"/v\d+/' --no-filename

# Also check for any existing API version constants
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $"v1"'

Length of output: 4645

components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
components/favro/favro.app.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
components/favro/favro.app.mjs Show resolved Hide resolved
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
components/favro/favro.app.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
components/favro/package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1)

31-31: Rename variable 'usersIds' to 'users' for clarity

When listing users, the variable usersIds may cause confusion. Renaming it to users enhances clarity and better represents the content.

Apply this diff to update the variable name:

- const usersIds = response.entities;
- return usersIds.map(({
+ const users = response.entities;
+ return users.map(({
components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1)

20-29: Consider adding error handling in the run method

To ensure robustness, wrap the API call in a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions and provide informative error messages.

Apply this diff to enhance error handling:

      async run({ $ }) {
+       try {
          const response = await this.app.listUsers({
            $,
            organizationId: this.organizationId,
          });

          $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.entities.length} user(s)`);

          return response;
+       } catch (error) {
+         throw new Error(`Failed to list users: ${error.message}`);
+       }
      },
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (2)

24-25: Remove extra blank lines to adhere to coding standards

There are unnecessary blank lines that violate the project's code style guidelines. Removing them improves code readability.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

Also applies to: 59-60

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 24-25: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

[failure] 24-24:
More than 1 blank line not allowed


43-61: Add error handling in the run method

Including error handling ensures that any issues during the API call are caught and appropriate feedback is provided.

Apply this diff to implement error handling:

      async run({ $ }) {
+       try {
          const response = await this.app.createOrganization({
            $,
            data: {
              name: this.name,
              shareToUsers: [
                {
                  userId: this.userId,
                  role: this.role,
                },
              ],
            },
          });

          $.export("$summary", `Successfully created organization named ${this.name}`);

          return response;
+       } catch (error) {
+         throw new Error(`Failed to create organization: ${error.message}`);
+       }
      },
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 59-60: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

[failure] 59-59:
More than 1 blank line not allowed

components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (2)

40-62: Enhance error handling and success message in the run method

Adding error handling improves reliability, and providing a more detailed success message enhances user feedback.

Apply this diff to implement the improvements:

      async run({ $ }) {
+       try {
          const response = await this.app.updateOrganization({
            $,
            organizationId: this.organizationId,
            data: {
              name: this.name,
              shareToUsers: [
                {
                  userId: this.userId,
                  role: this.role,
                },
              ],
            },
          });

-         $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated organization with ID '${this.organizationId}'`);
+         $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated organization '${this.name}' (ID: ${this.organizationId})`);

          return response;
+       } catch (error) {
+         throw new Error(`Failed to update organization: ${error.message}`);
+       }
      },
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed


58-59: Remove extra blank line to comply with coding standards

An unnecessary blank line is present, which goes against the project's code style guidelines. Removing it enhances code readability.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 954a9c9 and c445476.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/favro.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/favro/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/favro/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs

[error] 24-25: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)


[error] 59-60: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs

[error] 58-59: More than 1 blank line not allowed.

(no-multiple-empty-lines)

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/favro/actions/create-organization/create-organization.mjs

[failure] 24-24:
More than 1 blank line not allowed


[failure] 59-59:
More than 1 blank line not allowed

components/favro/actions/update-organization/update-organization.mjs

[failure] 58-58:
More than 1 blank line not allowed

🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/favro/favro.app.mjs (2)

66-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary template literals from authentication credentials

The template literals in username and password are unnecessary. Directly using the variables prevents potential issues and simplifies the code.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

            auth: {
-              username: `${this.$auth.username}`,
-              password: `${this.$auth.api_token}`,
+              username: this.$auth.username,
+              password: this.$auth.api_token,
            },

56-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling to the _makeRequest method

The _makeRequest method lacks error handling, which can lead to unhandled exceptions. Wrap the request in a try-catch block to provide meaningful error messages and improve reliability.

Apply this diff to implement error handling:

        async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
          const {
            $ = this,
            path,
            ...otherOpts
          } = opts;
+         try {
            return await axios($, {
              ...otherOpts,
              url: this._baseUrl() + path,
              auth: {
                username: this.$auth.username,
                password: this.$auth.api_token,
              },
            });
+         } catch (err) {
+           throw new Error(`Favro API request failed: ${err.message}`);
+         }
        },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung merged commit 184654d into master Dec 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung deleted the issue-13271 branch December 5, 2024 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] favro
3 participants