[Components] epsy #14049 #14749
[Components] epsy #14049 #14749
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules for handling email and name lookup actions, as well as enhancements to the main application file. The new modules include Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/epsy/actions/name-lookup/name-lookup.mjs (1)
6-6: Consider using environment variables for documentation URLThe documentation URL is hardcoded in the description. Consider moving it to an environment variable or configuration file to make it easier to update across all components.
components/epsy/actions/get-lookup-results/get-lookup-results.mjs (1)
1-38: Consider architectural improvements for scalabilityAs this component handles lookup results retrieval, consider implementing these architectural improvements:
- Add caching mechanism for frequently accessed results
- Implement rate limiting handling with exponential backoff
- Add support for pagination if the API supports it
- Consider implementing a timeout mechanism for long-running requests
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural improvements?
components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs (1)
7-11: Consider using a more descriptive prop name instead of 'value'The prop name
valueis quite generic. Using a more specific name (e.g.,lookupValueorsearchValue) can improve code readability and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/epsy/actions/email-lookup/email-lookup.mjs(1 hunks)components/epsy/actions/get-lookup-results/get-lookup-results.mjs(1 hunks)components/epsy/actions/name-lookup/name-lookup.mjs(1 hunks)components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/epsy/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/epsy/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM on version bump, but please complete the PR description.
The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly follows semantic versioning for feature additions. However, please complete the "WHY" section in the PR description to document the rationale behind these changes.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
The dependency on @pipedream/platform is correctly specified. Let's verify if 3.0.3 is the latest compatible version.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information to verify the version compatibility:
@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is appropriate for this component
The version 3.0.3 of @pipedream/platform is one of the latest versions being used across the codebase, with several recent components also using this version. This version appears to be stable and compatible, as evidenced by:
- Multiple recently updated components using version 3.0.3 (e.g., zoho_survey, x_ai, wrike)
- Recent PRs showing active development with the platform package
- No deprecation notices or breaking changes indicated in recent component updates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version of @pipedream/platform and its usage across the codebase
# Check for other components using @pipedream/platform to verify version consistency
echo "Checking @pipedream/platform versions across components:"
fd package.json components/ --exec grep -l "@pipedream/platform" {} \; | xargs grep -l "\"@pipedream/platform\":" | xargs grep "\"@pipedream/platform\":"
# Check if this version is used in other recent PRs
echo "Checking recent PRs using @pipedream/platform:"
gh pr list --search "@pipedream/platform in:files" --limit 5 --json number,title,url
Length of output: 95638
components/epsy/actions/name-lookup/name-lookup.mjs (1)
11-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation for the value prop
The value prop lacks explicit validation rules. Consider adding type checking, required flag, and any specific format requirements for name lookups.
components/epsy/actions/email-lookup/email-lookup.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM: Import statement is correctly structured
The import statement follows ES module conventions and uses the correct relative path.
4-8: Use HTTPS for documentation link
The documentation link should use HTTPS for security. Also, consider verifying if the documentation link is accessible.
Suggested change:
- description: "Request a lookup for the provided email. [See the documentation](https://irbis.espysys.com/developer/)",
+ description: "Request a lookup for the provided email. [See the documentation](https://irbis.espysys.com/developer/)",20-26: Verify emailLookup method implementation
Let's verify the implementation of the emailLookup method in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation of emailLookup method is correct
The emailLookup method in epsy.app.mjs is properly implemented as a wrapper around _makeRequest with the correct endpoint "/developer/combined_email" and HTTP POST method. The usage in the email-lookup.mjs action matches this implementation, passing the required parameters correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the emailLookup method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'emailLookup({
$$$
}) {
$$$
}' components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern for emailLookup
ast-grep --pattern 'emailLookup($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also search for any file containing emailLookup
rg -l "emailLookup"
# Check the app.mjs file content
fd -e mjs "epsy.app.mjs" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2070
9-17: Verify value prop definition in app module
The value prop references a definition from the app module. Let's verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Value prop definition is correctly implemented
The value prop is properly defined in the app module (components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs) with appropriate type, label, and description. The implementation in email-lookup.mjs correctly references this prop definition and is consistently used across other actions (name-lookup, get-lookup-results) in the same way.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the value prop definition in the app module
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
value: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the app module exists and see its content
cat components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs
# As a backup, let's also search for any prop definitions containing 'value'
ast-grep --pattern 'prop: {
$$$
value: {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# And search for any value-related definitions using ripgrep
rg "value.*:" -A 5 components/epsy/
Length of output: 5325
components/epsy/actions/get-lookup-results/get-lookup-results.mjs (2)
1-8: Verify documentation link accessibility
The documentation link in the description should be verified to ensure it's publicly accessible and correctly points to the API documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is accessible
The documentation URL https://irbis.espysys.com/developer/ returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming it's accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is accessible
curl -I "https://irbis.espysys.com/developer/" | head -n 1
Length of output: 466
9-23: Verify prop definitions and consider adding validation
The value and searchId props are referenced from the app module. Let's verify their definitions and consider adding validation if not already present.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output found, I can now generate the final response:
Props are properly defined with validation and options
The value and searchId props in the epsy app module are well-defined with appropriate validation:
valueprop has type, label, and description definedsearchIdprop includes type, label, description, and an async options function that fetches available search IDs dynamically
The implementation follows best practices by:
- Using proper type validation
- Including descriptive labels and descriptions
- Providing dynamic options for searchId through an API call
- Following standard prop definition patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find prop definitions in the app module
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
value: $_,
$$$
searchId: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the prop definitions
# First, let's locate the app.mjs file
fd -t f "app.mjs" --exec rg -l "propDefinitions?"
# Then search for value and searchId prop definitions with context
rg -A 5 -B 5 "value:|searchId:" --type js
Length of output: 97805
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the prop definitions in the epsy app module
fd -t f "epsy.app.mjs" --exec rg -A 10 -B 10 "propDefinitions:|value:|searchId:"
# Also search for any related files in the epsy component
fd -t f . --full-path ".*components/epsy/.*" --exec rg -A 10 -B 10 "propDefinitions:|value:|searchId:"
Length of output: 969
components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs (1)
49-49: Verify if including the API key in query parameters is appropriate
Including API keys in query parameters may expose them in logs or browser history. Verify whether the API supports passing the API key in request headers instead, to enhance security.
| $, | ||
| params: { | ||
| value: this.value, | ||
| lookupId: "149", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move hardcoded lookupId to configuration
The lookupId: "149" is hardcoded. This should be moved to a configuration file or environment variable for better maintainability.
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.nameLookup({ | ||
| $, | ||
| params: { | ||
| value: this.value, | ||
| lookupId: "149", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and input validation
The run method needs several improvements:
- Add try-catch block for API call error handling
- Validate input before making the API call
- Add type checking for the response
Here's a suggested implementation:
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.value?.trim()) {
+ throw new Error("Name value cannot be empty");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.nameLookup({
$,
params: {
value: this.value,
- lookupId: "149",
+ lookupId: process.env.EPSY_LOOKUP_ID,
},
});
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid response from API");
+ }
$.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Name lookup failed: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.nameLookup({ | |
| $, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| lookupId: "149", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.value?.trim()) { | |
| throw new Error("Name value cannot be empty"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.nameLookup({ | |
| $, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| lookupId: process.env.EPSY_LOOKUP_ID, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid response from API"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Name lookup failed: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| const response = await this.app.nameLookup({ | ||
| $, | ||
| params: { | ||
| value: this.value, | ||
| lookupId: "149", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
API integration appears to be properly implemented but lacks explicit error handling
The verification reveals:
- The API endpoint
/developer/combined_nameis properly implemented inepsy.app.mjs - The request is handled through a common
_makeRequestmethod using axios - However, there's no explicit error handling at either the app level or in the name-lookup action
Recommendations:
- Add try-catch block in the name-lookup action to handle potential API errors
- Consider implementing error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod to standardize error responses - Document the expected response structure for better maintainability
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify API integration and response handling
Please verify:
- The API endpoint implementation in the app file
- The expected response structure
- Error handling in the app.nameLookup method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check app.nameLookup implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'nameLookup({ $_, params }) {
$$$
}'
# Check for error handling in app file
rg -A 5 "throw new Error" "components/epsy/"
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for nameLookup method implementation with broader pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'nameLookup($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for files containing nameLookup references
rg "nameLookup" -A 5
# Search for API-related error handling patterns
rg "catch|throw" -A 3 "components/epsy/"
# Look for any configuration or type definitions related to nameLookup
fd "nameLookup" --type f
Length of output: 925
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the _makeRequest implementation for error handling
ast-grep --pattern '_makeRequest($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for base request handling or HTTP client setup
rg "_makeRequest" -A 10 "components/epsy/"
# Check if there's any common error handling
rg "class EpsyError|class ApiError" "components/epsy/"
Length of output: 2185
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.emailLookup({ | ||
| $, | ||
| params: { | ||
| value: this.value, | ||
| lookupId: "67", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and make lookupId configurable
Several improvements are recommended for the run method:
- The lookupId should be configurable through props rather than hardcoded
- Add error handling for failed requests
- Add input validation for the value parameter
- Add type checking for the response
Here's a suggested implementation:
props: {
app,
value: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"value",
],
},
+ lookupId: {
+ type: "string",
+ label: "Lookup ID",
+ description: "The ID of the lookup to perform",
+ default: "67",
+ },
},
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.value) {
+ throw new Error("Value is required");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.emailLookup({
$,
params: {
value: this.value,
- lookupId: "67",
+ lookupId: this.lookupId,
},
});
+
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid response from API");
+ }
$.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Email lookup failed: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.emailLookup({ | |
| $, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| lookupId: "67", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| props: { | |
| app, | |
| value: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| app, | |
| "value", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| lookupId: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Lookup ID", | |
| description: "The ID of the lookup to perform", | |
| default: "67", | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.value) { | |
| throw new Error("Value is required"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.emailLookup({ | |
| $, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| lookupId: this.lookupId, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid response from API"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent request. Use the ID to get the results: '${response.id}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Email lookup failed: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.getLookupResults({ | ||
| $, | ||
| searchId: this.searchId, | ||
| params: { | ||
| value: this.value, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved the details of the request with ID: '${this.searchId}'`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and improve response handling
The current implementation could be more robust. Consider these essential improvements:
- Add try-catch block for API call error handling
- Validate inputs before making the request
- Add type checking for the response
- Include meaningful details in the success message (e.g., number of results)
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.searchId?.trim()) {
+ throw new Error("searchId is required");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.getLookupResults({
$,
searchId: this.searchId,
params: {
value: this.value,
},
});
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved the details of the request with ID: '${this.searchId}'`);
+ const resultCount = Array.isArray(response?.results) ? response.results.length : 0;
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${resultCount} result(s) for request ID: '${this.searchId}'`);
+ if (!response?.results) {
+ throw new Error("Unexpected response format");
+ }
+
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to get lookup results: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.getLookupResults({ | |
| $, | |
| searchId: this.searchId, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved the details of the request with ID: '${this.searchId}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.searchId?.trim()) { | |
| throw new Error("searchId is required"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.getLookupResults({ | |
| $, | |
| searchId: this.searchId, | |
| params: { | |
| value: this.value, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resultCount = Array.isArray(response?.results) ? response.results.length : 0; | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${resultCount} result(s) for request ID: '${this.searchId}'`); | |
| if (!response?.results) { | |
| throw new Error("Unexpected response format"); | |
| } | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to get lookup results: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
components/epsy/epsy.app.mjs
Outdated
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | ||
| const { | ||
| $ = this, | ||
| path, | ||
| headers, | ||
| params, | ||
| ...otherOpts | ||
| } = opts; | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| ...otherOpts, | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| "accept": "application/json", | ||
| "content-type": "application/json", | ||
| }, | ||
| params: { | ||
| ...params, | ||
| key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling in the _makeRequest method
Currently, the _makeRequest method does not include error handling. Consider adding error handling to manage API request failures gracefully, ensuring that errors are caught and meaningful feedback is provided.
Apply this diff to add basic error handling:
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
const {
$ = this,
path,
headers,
params,
...otherOpts
} = opts;
- return axios($, {
- ...otherOpts,
- url: this._baseUrl() + path,
- headers: {
- ...headers,
- "accept": "application/json",
- "content-type": "application/json",
- },
- params: {
- ...params,
- key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
- },
- });
+ try {
+ return await axios($, {
+ ...otherOpts,
+ url: this._baseUrl() + path,
+ headers: {
+ ...headers,
+ "accept": "application/json",
+ "content-type": "application/json",
+ },
+ params: {
+ ...params,
+ key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
+ },
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ $.emit("error", error);
+ throw error;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| params, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| return axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| "accept": "application/json", | |
| "content-type": "application/json", | |
| }, | |
| params: { | |
| ...params, | |
| key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| params, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| try { | |
| return await axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| "accept": "application/json", | |
| "content-type": "application/json", | |
| }, | |
| params: { | |
| ...params, | |
| key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| $.emit("error", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }, |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Version Update