14645 components zoho books #14764
14645 components zoho books #14764
Conversation
- Component refactoring Sources - New Customer - New Expense - New Sales Invoice Actions - Create Customer - Create Estimate
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the Zoho Books integration, including new modules for creating and managing customers, expenses, invoices, and sales orders. Key updates involve restructuring property definitions to follow camelCase conventions, integrating constants for various options, and shifting from direct API calls using axios to utilizing methods from the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ZohoBooks
participant API
User->>ZohoBooks: Create Customer
ZohoBooks->>API: POST /customers
API-->>ZohoBooks: Customer Created
ZohoBooks-->>User: Success Message
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 42
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (40)
components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/new-expense.mjs (2)
4-11: Enhance the component description for better clarity.While the configuration is well-structured, consider expanding the description to provide more context about what constitutes an expense in Zoho Books and any relevant expense properties that users should be aware of.
- description: "Emit new event when a new expense is created.", + description: "Emit new event when a new expense (e.g., bills, vendor payments, or other business expenses) is created in Zoho Books.",
12-26: Add defensive programming measures to handle edge cases.The methods implementation could benefit from additional error handling and validation:
getSummaryshould handle cases where description is undefinedgetFunctionshould verify the zohoBooks instance is properly initializedgetFunction() { + if (!this.zohoBooks?.listExpenses) { + throw new Error("Zoho Books client is not properly initialized"); + } return this.zohoBooks.listExpenses; }, getSummary(item) { - return `New Expense: ${item.description}`; + return `New Expense: ${item?.description || "No description provided"}`; },components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs (2)
12-26: Consider adding error handling for API responses.While the methods are well-structured, consider adding error handling for cases where the API response might not contain the expected fields (
contact_id,contact_name).getSummary(item) { + if (!item?.contact_name) { + return "New Customer (name not available)"; + } return `New Customer: ${item.contact_name}`; },
1-28: Consider adding webhook setup documentation.Since this is a webhook source, it would be helpful to add documentation comments explaining how to set up the corresponding webhook in Zoho Books, including any required permissions or configurations.
Add documentation at the top of the file:
+/** + * # Zoho Books New Customer Source + * + * ## Setup + * 1. Navigate to Zoho Books Settings > Integrations > Webhooks + * 2. Create a new webhook for the "Customer Created" event + * 3. Configure the webhook URL (Pipedream will provide this) + * 4. Ensure your API user has appropriate permissions + */ import common from "../common/base.mjs";components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/new-sales-order.mjs (1)
4-11: Consider starting with version 0.1.0 for the initial release.The configuration is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The unique deduplication strategy is appropriate for webhook events. However, consider using semantic versioning starting with 0.1.0 for the initial release, as 0.0.1 typically indicates a pre-release version.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "0.1.0",components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/test-event.mjs (1)
1-25: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The object structure accurately represents a Zoho Books expense record and follows the API's naming conventions.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose of this test event:
+/** + * Sample test event for the Zoho Books New Expense webhook + * @see https://www.zoho.com/books/api/v3/#Expenses + */ export default {components/zoho_books/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (2)
11-17: Consider enhancing the customerId description with deletion impact.While the property definition is good, the description could be more explicit about the irreversible nature of deletion.
- description: "The Id of the contact which will be deleted.", + description: "The ID of the contact to be permanently deleted. This action cannot be undone.",
21-27: LGTM! Clean implementation with good user feedback.The implementation is well-structured with:
- Simplified API call using the zohoBooks client
- Clear success message in the summary
- Proper response handling
Consider adding a try-catch block for more specific error messaging:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.zohoBooks.deleteContact({ $, customerId: this.customerId, }); $.export("$summary", `Contact successfully deleted with Id: ${this.customerId}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to delete contact: ${error.message}`); + } },components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: Add JSDoc documentation for better type hints and usage clarity.The function handles different types well but could benefit from clear documentation of its purpose and expected types.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation:
+/** + * Attempts to parse string or array elements as JSON, falling back to original values if parsing fails + * @param {any} obj - The value to parse + * @returns {any} Parsed value or original if parsing not possible/needed + */ export const parseObject = (obj) => {Also consider a more functional approach to reduce nesting:
export const parseObject = (obj) => { if (!obj) return undefined; if (Array.isArray(obj)) { - return obj.map((item) => { - if (typeof item === "string") { - try { - return JSON.parse(item); - } catch (e) { - return item; - } - } - return item; - }); + return obj.map((item) => + typeof item === "string" + ? parseObject(item) + : item + ); } if (typeof obj === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(obj); } catch (e) { return obj; } } return obj; };components/zoho_books/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
11-21: Consider adding optional employee fields for enhanced functionality.While the current implementation covers the basic required fields, consider adding optional fields that could be valuable for employee creation, such as:
- phone
- designation (job title)
- department
- branch
props: { zohoBooks, name: { type: "string", label: "Name", description: "Name of the employee.", }, email: { type: "string", label: "Email", description: "Email of the employee.", }, + phone: { + type: "string", + label: "Phone", + description: "Phone number of the employee.", + optional: true, + }, + designation: { + type: "string", + label: "Designation", + description: "Job title or designation of the employee.", + optional: true, + }, },components/zoho_books/actions/get-invoice/get-invoice.mjs (2)
13-18: Enhance the invoiceId property description.While the property definition is well-structured, consider providing more context in the description, such as where to find the invoice ID or its format.
- description: "ID of the invoice to get details.", + description: "The unique identifier of the invoice. You can find this ID in the Zoho Books dashboard or via the list-invoices action.",
33-35: Consider removing redundant accept parameter.The
accept: "json"parameter appears to be redundant as it's likely the default format for the API response.params: { print: this.print, - accept: "json", },components/zoho_books/common/constants.mjs (2)
11-64: Apply DRY principle to location labelsThe repeated strings "(UAE Supported)" and "(GCC Supported)" should be extracted as constants to improve maintainability.
+const UAE_SUPPORTED = "(UAE Supported)"; +const GCC_SUPPORTED = "(GCC Supported)"; + export const PLACE_OF_SUPPLY_OPTIONS = [ { - label: "Abu Dhabi (UAE Supported)", + label: `Abu Dhabi ${UAE_SUPPORTED}`, value: "AB", }, // ... apply similar changes to other entries ];
1-196: Add documentation and improve organizationConsider the following improvements:
- Add JSDoc documentation for each constant group explaining their purpose and usage
- Group related constants together (e.g., all invoice-related constants)
- Add references to Zoho Books API documentation
Example documentation:
/** * Payment modes supported by Zoho Books API * @see https://www.zoho.com/books/api/v3/#payment-modes */ export const PAYMENT_MODE_OPTIONS = [ ... ];components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (3)
1-1: Remove legacy hash commentThis appears to be a new file, so the legacy hash comment is unnecessary and should be removed.
-// legacy_hash_id: a_Xzi1qo
89-90: Fix typos in property descriptionsThere are typos in the following property descriptions:
- paymentTermsLabel: "paymet" should be "payment"
- notes: "Commennts" should be "Comments"
- description: "Label for the paymet due details.", + description: "Label for the payment due details.",- description: "Commennts about the payment made by the contact.", + description: "Comments about the payment made by the contact.",Also applies to: 97-98
138-165: Consider enhancing error handlingWhile the implementation is solid, consider adding specific error handling for common API failure scenarios (e.g., duplicate contact names, invalid currency IDs, etc.) to provide more meaningful error messages to users.
Example enhancement:
try { const response = await this.zohoBooks.createContact({...}); $.export("$summary", `Contact successfully created with Id: ${response.contact.contact_id}`); return response; } catch (error) { if (error.response?.data?.message) { throw new Error(`Zoho Books API Error: ${error.response.data.message}`); } throw error; }components/zoho_books/actions/list-contacts/list-contacts.mjs (1)
7-7: Update the description to remove reference toorganization_id.The
organization_idprop has been removed from the action's properties, but the description still mentions it. Please update the description to reflect the current implementation to avoid confusion.components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (1)
20-20: Standardize capitalization in labels and descriptionsEnsure that acronyms are capitalized consistently in labels and descriptions for professionalism and clarity.
Apply this diff to fix the capitalization:
// Line 20 - Correct "Http" to "HTTP" label: "Request Method", - description: "Http method to use in the request.", + description: "HTTP method to use in the request.", options: [ "get", "post", // Line 32 - Correct "Url" to "URL" in label and description - relativeUrl: { + relativeURL: { type: "string", - label: "Relative Url", + label: "Relative URL", - description: "A path relative to Zoho Books to send the request against.", + description: "A path relative to the Zoho Books API to send the request against.", },Also applies to: 32-32
components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs (5)
68-70: Correct the description for thecustomerIdpropertyThe description currently states "ID of the expense account," which seems misleading. It should be updated to "ID of the customer."
Apply this diff to correct the description:
description: "ID of the expense account.", + description: "ID of the customer.",
74-76: Clarify the description for thevendorIdpropertyThe current description "ID of the vendor the expense is made" could be clearer. Consider updating it to "ID of the vendor associated with the expense."
Apply this diff to improve the description:
description: "ID of the vendor the expense is made.", + description: "ID of the vendor associated with the expense.",
19-22: Enhance handling ofdescriptionvariantsThe description mentions variants
description_startswithanddescription_contains, but the code passesdescriptiondirectly to the API. To support these variants, consider allowing users to specify the variant type and adjusting the API parameters accordingly.You might introduce a new prop to select the variant and modify the
paramsobject like so:+ descriptionVariant: { + type: "string", + label: "Description Variant", + description: "Select the variant for description search.", + optional: true, + options: ["description", "description_startswith", "description_contains"], + },Then, adjust the
paramsin therunmethod:- description: this.description, + [this.descriptionVariant || "description"]: this.description,
25-28: Enhance handling ofreferenceNumbervariantsSimilar to
description, thereferenceNumberfield mentions variantsreference_number_startswithandreference_number_contains. Consider providing a way for users to specify these variants and adjust the API parameters accordingly.Introduce a new prop for the variant selection:
+ referenceNumberVariant: { + type: "string", + label: "Reference Number Variant", + description: "Select the variant for reference number search.", + optional: true, + options: ["reference_number", "reference_number_startswith", "reference_number_contains"], + },And adjust the
params:- reference_number: this.referenceNumber, + [this.referenceNumberVariant || "reference_number"]: this.referenceNumber,
31-34: Supportdatevariants in API parametersThe
datefield mentions variantsdate_start,date_end,date_before, anddate_after. Currently, onlydateis being passed to the API. Consider allowing users to specify these variants and adjust the API parameters accordingly.Add a prop for the date variant:
+ dateVariant: { + type: "string", + label: "Date Variant", + description: "Select the variant for date search.", + optional: true, + options: ["date", "date_start", "date_end", "date_before", "date_after"], + },Modify the
paramsin therunmethod:- date: this.date, + [this.dateVariant || "date"]: this.date,components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer-payment/create-customer-payment.mjs (3)
20-24: Consider adding validation or default value forpaymentModeThe
paymentModeprop is required and provides options fromPAYMENT_MODE_OPTIONS. Adding validation or a default value can enhance user experience by ensuring a valid payment mode is always selected.
113-130: Optimize construction of thedataobject in therunmethodTo improve readability and maintainability, consider constructing the
dataobject by including properties conditionally. This can prevent inclusion of undefined values and makes the code cleaner.Example:
const data = { customer_id: this.customerId, payment_mode: this.paymentMode, amount: this.amount, date: this.date, reference_number: this.referenceNumber, description: this.description, invoices: this.invoices, custom_fields: this.customFields, invoice_id: this.invoiceId, account_id: this.accountId, }; // Conditionally add numeric fields if (this.exchangeRate !== undefined) { data.exchange_rate = parseFloat(this.exchangeRate); } if (this.bankCharges !== undefined) { data.bank_charges = parseFloat(this.bankCharges); } if (this.amountApplied !== undefined) { data.amount_applied = parseFloat(this.amountApplied); } if (this.taxAmountWithheld !== undefined) { data.tax_amount_withheld = parseFloat(this.taxAmountWithheld); } if (this.contactPersons) { data.contact_persons = this.contactPersons; }
134-134: Enhance the summary message for better clarityIncluding additional details in the summary message can improve user experience by providing more context about the created payment.
Example:
- $.export("$summary", `Customer payment successfully created with Id: ${response.payment.payment_id}`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created payment of ${this.amount} for Customer ID ${this.customerId}. Payment ID: ${response.payment.payment_id}`);components/zoho_books/actions/list-invoices/list-invoices.mjs (4)
12-12: Correct the documentation link in the description.The description points to the Contacts API documentation instead of the Invoices API. Please update the link to refer to the correct Invoices API documentation.
Suggested change:
-description: "Lists all invoices. [See the documentation](https://www.zoho.com/books/api/v3/contacts/#list-contacts)", +description: "Lists all invoices. [See the documentation](https://www.zoho.com/books/api/v3/invoices/#list-invoices)",
61-61: Correct the description for theThe description for the
Suggested change:
email: { type: "string", label: "Email", - description: "Search contacts by email id. Max-length [100]", + description: "Search invoices by customer email. Max-length [100]", optional: true, },
95-97: Add a description for thelastModifiedTimeprop.The
lastModifiedTimeprop is missing adescriptionfield, which is required according to the component guidelines.Suggested change:
lastModifiedTime: { type: "string", label: "Last Modified Time", + description: "List invoices modified after this time. Use ISO 8601 format.", optional: true, },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[warning] 95-95:
Component prop lastModifiedTime must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
109-109: Improve the description for thecustomerIdprop.The description for
customerIdis unclear. Consider rephrasing it to accurately reflect its purpose.Suggested change:
customerId: { type: "string", label: "Customer Id", - description: "ID of the customer the invoice has to be created.", + description: "Search invoices for the specified customer ID.", optional: true, },components/zoho_books/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs (2)
48-48: Add missing space in 'SKU' descriptionThere's a missing space after the comma in the
descriptionof theSKUproperty. It should read: "SKU value of item, should be unique throughout the product".Apply this diff:
description: "SKU value of item,should be unique throughout the product", + description: "SKU value of item, should be unique throughout the product",
106-106: Clarify the description for 'Purchase Account Id'The description for
purchaseAccountIdis unclear and might confuse users. It currently reads: "Mandatory, if item_type is purchase / sales and purchase / inventory." Please clarify the conditions under which this field is mandatory.Consider rephrasing the description:
description: "ID of the COGS account to which the item has to be associated with. Mandatory, if item_type is purchase / sales and purchase / inventory.", + description: "ID of the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) account to associate with the item. Mandatory if `item_type` is 'purchase', 'sales and purchase', or 'inventory'.",components/zoho_books/actions/update-salesorder/update-salesorder.mjs (2)
27-27: Grammar correction in the description ofcustomerId.The description should be updated for clarity: change "ID of the customer to whom the sales order has to be created." to "ID of the customer for whom the sales order has to be created."
38-38: Grammar correction in the description ofcontactPersons.Update the description: change "A list of contact person(s) for whom sales order has to be sent." to "A list of contact person(s) to whom the sales order has to be sent."
components/zoho_books/actions/create-estimate/create-estimate.mjs (1)
388-388: Update summary message to correctly reflect action outcomeThe summary message states "Item successfully created..." but should read "Estimate successfully created..." since this action creates an estimate.
Apply the following diff to update the summary message:
-$.export("$summary", `Item successfully created with Id: ${response.estimate.estimate_id}`); +$.export("$summary", `Estimate successfully created with Id: ${response.estimate.estimate_id}`);components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs (4)
286-286: Ensure consistent capitalization in prop labelsThe labels for
dateandShipment Dateare inconsistently capitalized. For consistency and professionalism, consider capitalizing "Date" in thedateprop label.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
date: { type: "string", - label: "date", + label: "Date", description: "The date the sales order is created.", }, shipmentDate: { type: "string", label: "Shipment Date", description: "Shipping date of the sales order.", },Also applies to: 291-291
521-524: Remove unnecessary information frompaymentTermsdescriptionThe description mentions "Max-length [100]" for an integer type, which is unnecessary and may cause confusion.
Apply this diff to simplify the description:
paymentTerms: { type: "integer", label: "Payment Terms", - description: "Payment terms in days e.g. 15, 30, 60. Invoice due date will be calculated based on this. Max-length [100]", + description: "Payment terms in days (e.g., 15, 30, 60). Invoice due date will be calculated based on this.", },
472-476: Improve labels fordocumentsanddocpropsThe labels "Documents" and "doc" could be more descriptive. Using "Attachments" or "Document Attachment" enhances clarity.
Apply this diff to update the labels:
documents: { type: "string[]", - label: "Documents", + label: "Attachments", description: "A list of documents to attach to the sales order.", }, doc: { type: "string", - label: "doc", + label: "Document Attachment", description: "Document to be attached.", },Also applies to: 502-505
517-519: Clarify thesendprop label and descriptionThe label "Send" for a boolean prop may not clearly convey its purpose. Consider rephrasing for better understanding.
Apply this diff to enhance clarity:
send: { type: "boolean", - label: "Send", + label: "Send Estimate", - description: "Send the estimate to the contact person(s) associated with the estimate.", + description: "If selected, the estimate will be sent to the associated contact person(s).", },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer-payment/create-customer-payment.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-estimate/create-estimate.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-salesorder/create-salesorder.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/get-invoice/get-invoice.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/get-item/get-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/list-contacts/list-contacts.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/list-invoices/list-invoices.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs(2 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/update-salesorder/update-salesorder.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/package.json(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/new-expense.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/new-sales-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- components/zoho_books/package.json
- components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs
- components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/test-event.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs
[warning] 215-215:
Component prop reason must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
components/zoho_books/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs
[warning] 140-140:
Component prop itemTaxPreferences must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
components/zoho_books/actions/list-invoices/list-invoices.mjs
[warning] 95-95:
Component prop lastModifiedTime must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs
[warning] 90-90:
Component prop expenseId must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 356-356:
Component prop crmOwnerId must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 360-360:
Component prop crmCustomReferenceId must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 440-440:
Component prop adjustment must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 444-444:
Component prop deliveryMethod must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 459-459:
Component prop adjustmentDescription must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
[warning] 463-463:
Component prop pricebookId must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/new-expense.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-structured, using the correct ES module syntax and following proper naming conventions.
27-27: Verify the test event structure matches Zoho Books API.
Ensure that the sample event in test-event.mjs accurately reflects the current Zoho Books API response structure for expenses.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure matches Zoho Books API
The test event structure in test-event.mjs accurately reflects the Zoho Books API response structure for expenses, containing all the essential fields like expense_id, date, account details, currency information, totals, and expense-specific attributes like expense_type and billable status.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if test event structure matches other expense-related files
# Look for expense-related type definitions or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $ExpenseType {
$$$
}'
# Look for expense-related sample data or schemas
rg -A 10 'expense.*schema' || rg -A 10 'expense.*sample'
Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test event file directly and any expense-related files
fd test-event.mjs --exec cat {}
# Also search for expense-related files and their content
fd -e mjs -e js -e ts expense --exec cat {}
Length of output: 101972
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look specifically for the test event file in the zoho_books source directory
fd test-event.mjs -p components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/ --exec cat {}
# Also check for any expense-related schema or type definitions
rg -g "*.mjs" -g "*.ts" "expense.*schema|type.*Expense" -A 5 components/zoho_books/
Length of output: 827
components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and well-structured imports.
The imports are properly organized, using ES module syntax and relative paths appropriately.
4-11: Verify version consistency with other Zoho Books components.
The metadata is well-structured, but let's ensure version consistency across the Zoho Books integration components.
✅ Verification successful
Version 0.0.1 is appropriate for this new source component
The version check reveals that:
- New components typically start at version 0.0.1
- There are other source components also at version 0.0.1
- Action components have higher versions (0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.5.0) due to their maturity
The initial version 0.0.1 for this new customer webhook source is consistent with other source components in the Zoho Books integration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check versions of other Zoho Books components
# Expected: All components should have consistent versioning
echo "Checking versions of Zoho Books components..."
rg '"version":\s*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/zoho_books/ -A 1
Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check versions in all source and action files
echo "Checking versions in all Zoho Books components..."
rg '"version":\s*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/zoho_books/ --type js --type mjs -A 1
Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check versions in all files, excluding package.json
echo "Checking versions in all Zoho Books components..."
rg 'version":\s*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/zoho_books/ --type-add 'mjs:*.mjs' -g '!package.json' -A 1
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find component versions
echo "Listing all Zoho Books component files..."
fd . components/zoho_books/ -e mjs -x cat {} | grep -A 1 "version:"
Length of output: 897
27-27: Verify test event structure matches current Zoho Books API.
Let's ensure the sample events in test-event.mjs accurately reflect the current Zoho Books API response structure.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure matches current Zoho Books API
Based on the examination of the Zoho Books app implementation and the test event structure, the sample event accurately reflects the current Zoho Books API contact/customer response structure. The test event includes all the essential fields that are used in the API implementation, such as contact_id, contact_name, company_name, currency_id, currency_code, etc., which align with the API's contact object structure as evidenced by the app's contact-related methods and prop definitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test event structure against Zoho Books API documentation references
# Expected: Test events should match current API structure
echo "Checking for API structure references in test events..."
cat components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 811
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for API schema or documentation references in the codebase
rg -l "contact_id|contact_name|company_name" --type js components/zoho_books/
# Check for any API validation or schema definitions
rg -l "schema|apiSchema" --type js components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/
# Look for any recent changes or updates to the API handling
rg "zoho.*api" --type js components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/
Length of output: 231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app file for API implementation details
cat components/zoho_books/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs
# Also check if there are any common files that might contain API schemas
fd schema.mjs -t f components/zoho_books/
Length of output: 719
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common base file for API implementation
cat components/zoho_books/common/base.mjs
# And check if there's a Zoho Books app file that might contain API definitions
fd zoho_books.app.mjs -t f components/zoho_books/
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Zoho Books app file for API implementation details
cat components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs
# Also check if there's any documentation in the component's README
cat components/zoho_books/README.md 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 22961
components/zoho_books/actions/get-item/get-item.mjs (3)
2-8: LGTM! Good improvements to documentation and versioning.
The changes improve the component's maintainability by:
- Using the centralized zohoBooks module
- Adding clear API documentation reference
- Following semantic versioning with the bump to 0.3.0
20-26: LGTM! Clean implementation with good user feedback.
The run method is well-implemented with:
- Concise API call using zohoBooks module
- Clear success message
- Proper response handling
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The implementation is safe and properly handles errors through the platform's axios wrapper
The verification shows that:
- The
getItemmethod in the Zoho Books app is implemented using the platform's axios wrapper (_makeRequest), which provides built-in error handling. - The error handling is managed at the platform level through the axios wrapper, which includes proper error conversion and debugging exports.
- The implementation follows the standard pattern used across other methods in the app.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in zohoBooks module
# Expected: Find error handling patterns in the getItem implementation
# Search for error handling in getItem method
ast-grep --pattern 'getItem($_) {
try {
$$$
} catch($_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the getItem implementation in the zohoBooks module
rg -A 10 "getItem.*\{" --type js
# Also search for any error handling patterns in the module
rg -A 5 "throw|catch" --type js
Length of output: 12342
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the zohoBooks module implementation
rg -l "zohoBooks" --type js
# Then let's examine the specific file content
fd -e js -e mjs "zoho.*books" -x cat {}
Length of output: 19591
11-17: Verify handling of organization context in zohoBooks module.
The props have been simplified to use the zohoBooks app's propDefinitions, which is good. However, let's verify that the organization context (previously required as organization_id) is properly handled by the zohoBooks module.
✅ Verification successful
Organization context is properly handled by the zohoBooks module
The organization context is automatically handled by the zohoBooks app module through the _params method, which injects the organization_id from auth into every API request. The simplified props in the get-item action are correct and maintain proper organization context handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if organization context is handled in zohoBooks module
# Expected: Find references to organization handling in the zohoBooks app file
# Search for organization handling in the app file
rg -A 5 "organization" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
# Check if getItem method includes organization context
ast-grep --pattern 'getItem($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the organization handling more thoroughly
# Check how organization_id is used in API calls
rg -B 2 -A 5 "_makeRequest.*items" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
# Check if getItem method exists and its implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async getItem($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for other item-related methods that might handle organization context
rg -A 5 "async.*[Ii]tem" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app file content first to understand the structure
cat "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
# Also check the actual action file to see the complete context
cat "components/zoho_books/actions/get-item/get-item.mjs"
Length of output: 20290
components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/new-sales-order.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-structured, explicitly importing only the required dependencies with proper file extensions.
27-27: Verify test event implementation.
The separation of test events into a dedicated file is a good practice. Let's verify the test event implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Test event implementation is properly structured and complete
The test event contains all essential fields for a Zoho Books sales order including:
- Core identifiers (salesorder_id, customer_id)
- Order details (status, number, reference)
- Financial information (currency, totals)
- Timestamps (created_time, last_modified_time)
- Custom fields support
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test event implementation
# Expected: Should find a properly structured test event for sales orders
# Search for the test event implementation
cat "components/zoho_books/sources/new-sales-order/test-event.mjs"
Length of output: 880
12-26: Verify zohoBooks object initialization in the common base.
The methods implementation is clean and follows good practices. The handling of API field names is consistent with Zoho Books conventions.
Let's verify the zohoBooks object initialization in the common base:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the zohoBooks app module to ensure proper initialization:
zohoBooks object is properly initialized and integrated
The implementation is correct and secure. The verification shows:
- The zohoBooks app is properly imported in the common base module
- It's correctly registered as a prop in the base component
- The app module provides all necessary API methods including
listSalesordersused by this source - The pagination helper is properly implemented in the app module to handle the API responses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify zohoBooks object initialization in the common base module
# Expected: Should find the zohoBooks initialization in the common base module
# Search for zohoBooks initialization in the common base module
rg -A 5 "zohoBooks" "components/zoho_books/sources/common/"
Length of output: 1203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the zoho_books app module implementation
cat "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
Length of output: 19566
components/zoho_books/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good improvements to documentation and versioning.
The changes improve maintainability by:
- Using the centralized zohoBooks client instead of direct axios calls
- Adding clear documentation links
- Appropriate version bump reflecting the architectural changes
Also applies to: 7-8
11-17: Verify organization context handling in zohoBooks client.
The removal of organization_id suggests this is now handled by the zohoBooks client. Let's verify this implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the deleteContact implementation.
Organization context is correctly handled by the client
The verification confirms that the organization context is properly managed at the client level. The organization_id is automatically included in requests through the client's _makeRequest method, which uses this.$auth.organization_id. The deleteContact method correctly relies on this base implementation, making the explicit organization_id parameter unnecessary.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how organization context is handled in the zohoBooks client
# Search for organization handling in the zohoBooks app file
rg -A 5 "organization" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
# Check if deleteContact method includes organization context
ast-grep --pattern 'deleteContact($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for deleteContact method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async deleteContact($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check the actual API calls in the app file
rg -B 2 -A 5 "deleteContact" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
Length of output: 298
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-41: Verify usage patterns across the codebase.
Let's ensure our suggested optimizations align with all usage patterns of these utility functions.
✅ Verification successful
These utility functions are actively used across the codebase
Based on the verification results:
parseObjectis widely used across 50+ components for parsing JSON data, handling arrays, and object transformationsclearObjis used in several critical components including:- zoho_subscriptions
- zoho_bugtracker
- zoho_books
- talenthr
- salesmate
- readwise
Both functions serve distinct purposes:
parseObject: Safely parses JSON strings and handles arraysclearObj: Removes null/empty values from objects, used primarily in API request preparation
The functions are well-designed and their current implementations are appropriate for their widespread usage patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage patterns of parseObject and clearObj
echo "Checking parseObject usage patterns:"
rg "parseObject\(" -A 3
echo "\nChecking clearObj usage patterns:"
rg "clearObj\(" -A 3
# Check for similar existing utility functions to avoid duplication
echo "\nChecking for similar existing utilities:"
fd -e js -e mjs -e ts | xargs rg "parse.*Object|clean.*Object|clear.*Object"
Length of output: 100797
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
components/zoho_books/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good improvements to documentation and modularity.
The changes improve the component by:
- Using the centralized zohoBooks module instead of direct axios calls
- Adding helpful API documentation link
- Following semantic versioning
Also applies to: 7-8
2-2: Verify zohoBooks module implementation.
Let's ensure the zohoBooks module properly implements the employee creation endpoint.
Also applies to: 24-30
✅ Verification successful
Import and implementation verified successfully
The zohoBooks module correctly implements the createEmployee method with proper request configuration, making a POST request to the /employees endpoint. The import in create-employee.mjs correctly references this implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify zohoBooks module implementation of employee creation
# Check zohoBooks module for employee-related methods
rg -A 5 "createEmployee|employee" "components/zoho_books/zoho_books.app.mjs"
# Check for any other employee-related files
fd -e mjs -e js employee "components/zoho_books/"
Length of output: 408
components/zoho_books/actions/get-invoice/get-invoice.mjs (2)
2-9: LGTM! Good improvements to documentation and modularity.
The version bump is appropriate for the breaking changes, and the addition of the documentation link enhances maintainability. Moving print options to constants improves code reusability.
29-39: LGTM! Clean implementation with good error feedback.
The implementation is concise and follows best practices. The addition of the export summary provides good feedback for the action's execution.
components/zoho_books/sources/common/base.mjs (3)
1-14: LGTM! Props structure follows best practices.
The props configuration is well-structured with appropriate defaults and type definitions. The use of platform's default polling interval and standard service.db interface aligns with component best practices.
16-21: LGTM! Helper methods are well-designed.
The helper methods are properly scoped and handle the edge case of first run gracefully with a 0 fallback.
52-60: LGTM! Hooks implementation follows source component patterns.
The deploy and run methods follow the standard pattern for polling sources, with appropriate limiting of initial events.
components/zoho_books/common/constants.mjs (1)
178-191: Verify supported language codes and standardize format
The language codes use inconsistent formatting. Additionally, we should verify these against Zoho Books API documentation.
export const LANGUAGE_CODE_OPTIONS = [
"de",
"en",
"es",
"fr",
"it",
"ja",
"nl",
"pt",
- "pt_br",
+ "pt-br",
"sv",
"zh",
- "en_gb",
+ "en-gb",
];components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (1)
138-165: Verify the contact creation endpoint implementation
The implementation looks correct, but let's verify the endpoint usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the createContact method in zoho_books.app.mjs is correctly implemented and follows the same pattern as other apps in the codebase. The endpoint path /contacts and HTTP method POST are consistent with the Zoho Books API requirements. The implementation in the action file properly uses the app's createContact method and handles the response correctly.
Implementation of contact creation endpoint is correct
The endpoint usage is consistent with the Zoho Books API and follows the same patterns used across other integrations in the codebase. The implementation:
- Uses the correct endpoint path
/contacts - Uses the proper HTTP method
POST - Handles the response and exports a summary with the contact ID
- Properly transforms the data using
clearObjto handle undefined values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contact creation endpoint implementation in zohoBooks app
# Check the createContact method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'createContact($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for similar implementations to ensure consistency
rg -A 5 'createContact'
Length of output: 100558
components/zoho_books/actions/list-contacts/list-contacts.mjs (1)
14-25: Efficient use of the paginate method to list contacts.
The implementation correctly utilizes the paginate method to fetch all contacts, and the asynchronous iteration is handled properly. This enhances maintainability and aligns with the modular approach of using the zohoBooks module.
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (1)
Line range hint 22-28: Verify that HTTP method options match expected case
The options for requestMethod are specified in lowercase. Confirm that the API client accepts HTTP methods in lowercase, or convert them to uppercase if necessary.
components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs (2)
112-140: Use of paginate method is appropriate
The implementation of the paginate method correctly handles API response pagination, and the collection of expenses into responseArray is efficient.
117-130: Ensure parameter keys match user selections
In the params object, verify that all keys correspond correctly to the expected API parameters, especially after introducing variant props. This ensures accurate queries against the Zoho Books API.
Run the following script to confirm that all parameter keys are correctly used:
This script extracts and lists all parameter keys to help you verify their correctness.
✅ Verification successful
The previous script didn't yield results, likely due to incorrect whitespace matching. Let's try a different approach to verify the parameter keys:
Let's try a different approach with simpler regex patterns:
Now I have enough information to provide the final response. The code shows that all parameter keys in the params object directly correspond to the prop names using camelCase to snake_case conversion, which is the correct format for the Zoho Books API. The props are well-defined with proper types, labels, and descriptions that match their intended use.
Parameter keys correctly match API requirements
All parameter keys in the params object are properly mapped from their corresponding props:
- Props are defined in camelCase (e.g.,
referenceNumber,accountName) - Parameters are correctly converted to snake_case (e.g.,
reference_number,account_name) - All parameters align with their prop definitions and include proper documentation references
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for correct parameter keys in the API call.
# List all parameter keys used in the params object
echo "Parameters used in API call:"
grep -oP '(?<=\s{12})\w+(?=:)' components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs | sort | uniq
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the parameter keys in the API call and their corresponding prop definitions
echo "=== API Parameters and Props ==="
rg -U "params\s*=\s*{[^}]*}" components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs -A 20
echo -e "\n=== Props Definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'prop: {
$$$
}' components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Zoho Books API Documentation Reference ==="
rg -i "expense.*parameters" . --type md
Length of output: 607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the component implementation
echo "=== Component Implementation ==="
cat components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Search for prop definitions ==="
rg "type:" components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Search for Zoho Books API usage ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\.get\(" components/zoho_books/actions/list-expenses/list-expenses.mjs
Length of output: 5066
components/zoho_books/actions/create-customer-payment/create-customer-payment.mjs (2)
2-3: Verify import paths are correct and modules are accessible
The imports for PAYMENT_MODE_OPTIONS and parseObject are pointing to "../../common/constants.mjs" and "../../common/utils.mjs". Please ensure these paths are correct and the modules exist to avoid runtime errors.
101-108: Ensure correct handling of contactPersons data
The contactPersons prop is obtained via propDefinition, and parseObject is applied in the run method. Verify if parsing is necessary or if contactPersons should be used directly to prevent potential errors.
components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (2)
13-281: Great job updating property names to camelCase for consistency
Renaming properties to camelCase improves code readability and aligns with JavaScript naming conventions. This enhances maintainability and consistency across the codebase.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[warning] 215-215:
Component prop reason must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
284-332: Refactored run method improves code maintainability
Utilizing this.zohoBooks.createInvoice instead of direct API calls streamlines the code and leverages existing methods within the zohoBooks module. This refactoring enhances code reuse and maintainability.
components/zoho_books/actions/create-salesorder/create-salesorder.mjs (2)
249-253: Verify PropDefinition for 'avataxExemptNo'
The property avataxExemptNo is using the taxExemptionId propDefinition. Please verify that this is the correct propDefinition for avataxExemptNo, or update it to the appropriate one.
429-429: Verify Handling of 'documents' Field
Please verify that parsing this.documents with parseObject is appropriate for the documents field. Ensure it aligns with the Zoho Books API requirements for document uploads.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (2)
1-24: Add JSDoc documentation for better code maintainability.The function handles parsing well, but adding JSDoc would improve clarity and IDE support.
+/** + * Safely parses JSON strings and arrays containing JSON strings + * @param {any} obj - The input to parse + * @returns {any} Parsed object/array or original input if parsing fails + */ export const parseObject = (obj) => {
43-48: Improve code clarity with constants and documentation.The function works correctly but could be improved for maintainability.
+const BOOKS_API_PREFIX = '/books/v3'; +const PREFIX_LENGTH = BOOKS_API_PREFIX.length; + +/** + * Removes the '/books/v3' prefix from a URL if present + * @param {string} url - The URL to process + * @returns {string} URL without the prefix + */ export const checkUrl = (url) => { - if (url.startsWith("/books/v3")) { - return url.substring(9); + if (url.startsWith(BOOKS_API_PREFIX)) { + return url.substring(PREFIX_LENGTH); } return url; };components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (1)
291-327: Ensure consistent property naming in request data.The data object uses snake_case while props use camelCase. Consider using a utility function to convert between cases.
Consider creating a utility function to handle the case conversion:
const toCamelCase = (str) => str.replace(/_([a-z])/g, (g) => g[1].toUpperCase()); const toSnakeCase = (str) => str.replace(/[A-Z]/g, (g) => `_${g.toLowerCase()}`); const convertKeys = (obj, converter) => Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(obj).map(([k, v]) => [converter(k), v]) );components/zoho_books/actions/create-estimate/create-estimate.mjs (1)
388-388: Update the success message to reflect estimate creationThe summary message currently says "Item successfully created." Since this action creates an estimate, consider updating the message to "Estimate successfully created with Id: ..."
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (1)
8-8: Fix typo in descriptionThe word "aribitrary" contains a typo and should be "arbitrary".
- description: "Makes an aribitrary call to Zoho Books API", + description: "Makes an arbitrary call to Zoho Books API",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/zoho_books/actions/create-estimate/create-estimate.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs(2 hunks)components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/new-expense.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/zoho_books/sources/new-expense/new-expense.mjs
- components/zoho_books/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs
[warning] 215-215:
Component prop reason must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (1)
26-41: Critical: Fix O(n²) performance issue and improve readability.
The current implementation has performance implications due to spread operator usage in the reducer accumulator. Please refer to the previous review comment for the optimized solution.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
components/zoho_books/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (1)
215-219:
Add missing description for reason prop.
reason: {
type: "string",
label: "Reason",
+ description: "Reason for creating the invoice. This helps track the purpose of invoice creation.",
optional: true,
},Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[warning] 215-215:
Component prop reason must have a description. See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#props
components/zoho_books/actions/create-estimate/create-estimate.mjs (5)
68-68: Update property descriptions for 'estimateNumber', 'referenceNumber', 'date', and 'expiryDate'
The descriptions currently mention "Search estimates by...", which is not appropriate when creating an estimate. They should accurately reflect their purpose in estimate creation.
Also applies to: 74-74, 80-80, 86-86
184-189: Change the property type of 'adjustment' to 'number'
The property adjustment is defined using a propDefinition that sets its type to string. Since it's parsed to a float in the run method, it's better to define it as type: "number" to avoid unnecessary parsing and potential errors.
280-284: Change the property type of 'rate' to 'number'
The property rate is defined with type: "string" but is parsed to a float in the run method. Defining it as type: "number" would eliminate the need for parsing and reduce potential errors.
227-230: Correct the propDefinition for 'avataxExemptNo'
The propDefinition for avataxExemptNo is incorrectly set to "taxExemptionId". It should use the correct definition for avataxExemptNo.
375-381: Include item properties within the line_items array
The properties item_id, line_item_id, name, description, rate, unit, and quantity are added at the top level of the data object. According to the Zoho Books API, these should be included within the line_items array.
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (3)
50-57: LGTM! Well-structured API call implementation
The implementation correctly uses the zohoBooks._makeRequest method with proper parameter passing and input validation through checkUrl utility.
13-18:
Ensure queryString is properly handled as query parameters
The params field in the _makeRequest function expects an object, but this.queryString is defined as a string. This may lead to unexpected results or errors when making the API call.
Apply this diff to change the prop type:
queryString: {
- type: "string",
+ type: "object",
label: "Query String",
description: "Query string of the request.",
optional: true,
},59-59:
Correct the variable used in the summary message
The variable this.path is undefined in this context. It should be this.relativeUrl to correctly indicate the path called.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully called the path: ${this.path}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully called the path: ${this.relativeUrl}`);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: Add JSDoc documentation and improve error handlingThe function logic is sound, but could benefit from better documentation and error handling.
Consider this enhancement:
+/** + * Parses string or array of strings into JSON objects + * @param {string|Array|any} obj - Input to parse + * @returns {undefined|Object|Array|any} Parsed object, array, or original value + */ export const parseObject = (obj) => { if (!obj) return undefined; if (Array.isArray(obj)) { return obj.map((item) => { if (typeof item === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(item); - } catch (e) { + } catch (e) { + // Only return original string if it's a JSON parsing error + if (e instanceof SyntaxError) { return item; + } + throw e; // Re-throw unexpected errors } } return item; }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs(2 hunks)components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/zoho_books/common/utils.mjs (1)
26-41:
Critical: Fix O(n²) performance issue and improve readability.
The current implementation has performance implications due to spread operator usage in the reducer accumulator. Please refer to the previous review comment for the recommended fix.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 36-36: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (2)
2-9: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate
The version increment to 0.4.0 aligns with the significant changes in the implementation.
13-17:
Ensure queryString is properly handled as query parameters
The queryString prop type should be changed from "string" to "object" to match the expected type in _makeRequest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (1)
9-9: Fix typo in descriptionThere's a typo in the component's description: "aribitrary" should be "arbitrary".
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/zoho_books/actions/make-api-call/make-api-call.mjs (2)
13-18:
Ensure queryString is properly handled as query parameters
The params field in the _makeRequest function expects an object, but this.queryString is defined as a string. This may lead to unexpected results or errors when making the API call.
Apply this diff to change the prop type:
queryString: {
- type: "string",
+ type: "object",
label: "Query String",
description: "Query string of the request.",
optional: true,
},49-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and improve error handling
The current implementation could benefit from input validation and better error handling. Additionally, the success message could be more informative by including the HTTP method.
Apply this diff to enhance the implementation:
async run({ $ }) {
+ // Validate required inputs
+ if (!this.relativeUrl) {
+ throw new Error("Relative URL is required");
+ }
+ if (!this.requestMethod) {
+ throw new Error("Request method is required");
+ }
+
+ const path = checkUrl(this.relativeUrl);
+
const response = await this.zohoBooks._makeRequest({
$,
- path: checkUrl(this.relativeUrl),
+ path,
params: this.queryString,
method: this.requestMethod,
headers: this.headers,
data: this.requestBody,
- });
+ }).catch((error) => {
+ throw new Error(`API call failed: ${error.message}`);
+ });
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully called the path: ${this.relativeUrl}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully made ${this.requestMethod.toUpperCase()} request to ${this.relativeUrl}`);
return response;
},Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
/approve |
Resolves #14645
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
zohoBooksmodule for API calls, improving maintainability.Bug Fixes