13990 action testmonitor create a new test result #14803
Conversation
Actions - Create New Test Result
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughA new module has been added to the Test Monitor application for creating test results, alongside updates to version numbers across several existing modules. The new module includes properties for identifying the project, test case, and test run, and implements an asynchronous method to create test results. Additionally, several modules have had their version numbers incremented to reflect updates, while maintaining existing functionalities. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/testmonitor/actions/create-test-result/create-test-result.mjs (1)
48-67: Enhance error handling and success messageThe run method could benefit from improved error handling and a more informative success message.
Consider these improvements:
async run({ $ }) { + // Validate required fields + if (!this.testCaseId || !this.testRunId) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Test case ID and test run ID are required"); + } + try { const response = await this.testmonitor.createTestResult({ $, data: { test_case_id: this.testCaseId, test_run_id: this.testRunId, draft: this.draft, description: this.description, }, }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully created test result with Id: ${response.data.id}`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created ${this.draft ? 'draft ' : ''}test result #${response.data.id} for test case #${this.testCaseId}`); return response; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError((e.response.status === 400) - ? "It seems that there is already a test with this configuration!" - : e.response.data.message); + const status = e.response?.status; + const message = e.response?.data?.message || e.message; + + if (status === 400) { + throw new ConfigurationError("A test result with this configuration already exists"); + } else if (status === 404) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Test case or test run not found"); + } else { + throw new ConfigurationError(`Failed to create test result: ${message}`); + } } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/testmonitor/actions/create-test-result/create-test-result.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/actions/find-issue/find-issue.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/actions/find-project/find-project.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/actions/find-test-result/find-test-result.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/package.json(2 hunks)components/testmonitor/sources/new-issue/new-issue.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/sources/new-test-result/new-test-result.mjs(1 hunks)components/testmonitor/testmonitor.app.mjs(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- components/testmonitor/actions/find-test-result/find-test-result.mjs
- components/testmonitor/actions/find-issue/find-issue.mjs
- components/testmonitor/sources/new-test-result/new-test-result.mjs
- components/testmonitor/sources/new-issue/new-issue.mjs
- components/testmonitor/actions/find-project/find-project.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/testmonitor/testmonitor.app.mjs (1)
57-98: LGTM: Prop definitions are well-structured
The new testCaseId and testRunId prop definitions follow consistent patterns and include proper validation, descriptions, and pagination handling.
components/testmonitor/actions/create-test-result/create-test-result.mjs (1)
10-47: LGTM: Props are well-defined and documented
The props are properly structured with clear descriptions and correct dependencies.
components/testmonitor/package.json (1)
13-13: Verify compatibility with platform v3.0.3
The major version update of @pipedream/platform from ^1.2.1 to ^3.0.3 could introduce breaking changes.
Let's check for any breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information about the platform dependency usage in the testmonitor component to understand potential breaking changes.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
Platform dependency update appears safe
The component uses standard platform features that are stable across versions:
- HTTP client (
axios) - Common constants (
DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL) - Error handling (
ConfigurationError)
These core functionalities are maintained across major versions and the update should not introduce breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for breaking changes in platform dependency
# Get the changelog or release notes
gh api repos/PipedreamHQ/pipedream/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v3.0")) | .body'
# Look for imports of potentially changed platform features
rg -l "@pipedream/platform"
Length of output: 65845
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check platform dependency usage in testmonitor component
# Look for platform imports and usage in testmonitor component
rg -A 5 "@pipedream/platform" components/testmonitor/
# Check package.json history for previous version
git log -p components/testmonitor/package.json | grep "@pipedream/platform"
Length of output: 1879
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
components/sendgrid/actions/list-blocks/list-blocks.mjs (3)
Line range hint
66-66: Fix typo in success messageThere's a typo in the success message: "Successsfully" should be "Successfully".
- $.export("$summary", "Successsfully retrieved blocks"); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved blocks");
Line range hint
39-45: Enhance validation message and edge case handlingThe endTime validation message could be more specific about the requirements. Also, consider adding validation for the case where endTime is provided without startTime.
constraints.endTime = { numericality: { onlyInteger: true, greaterThan: this.startTime > 0 ? this.startTime : 0, - message: "must be positive integer, non zero, greater than `startTime`", + message: `must be a positive integer greater than startTime (${this.startTime})`, }, }; + if (!this.startTime) { + // Add warning when endTime is provided without startTime + console.warn("endTime provided without startTime - using 0 as lower bound"); + }
Line range hint
61-67: Add error handling for API callsThe API call should include proper error handling to provide meaningful feedback when the SendGrid API request fails.
- const resp = await this.sendgrid.listBlocks( - this.startTime, - this.endTime, - this.numberOfBlocks, - ); - $.export("$summary", "Successsfully retrieved blocks"); - return resp; + try { + const resp = await this.sendgrid.listBlocks( + this.startTime, + this.endTime, + this.numberOfBlocks, + ); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved blocks"); + return resp; + } catch (err) { + throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve blocks: ${err.message}`); + }components/sendgrid/actions/list-global-suppressions/list-global-suppressions.mjs (2)
Line range hint
36-46: Consider adding validation for maximum endTime valueWhile the validation ensures endTime is greater than startTime, it might be worth adding an upper limit to prevent potential issues with extremely large timestamps.
Consider adding a maximum value constraint:
constraints.endTime = { numericality: { onlyInteger: true, greaterThan: this.startTime > 0 ? this.startTime : 0, + lessThanOrEqualTo: 253402300799, // Year 9999 message: "must be positive integer, non zero, greater than `startTime`.", }, };
Fix spelling errors in variable names and messages
The spelling errors are confirmed in the file
components/sendgrid/actions/list-global-suppressions/list-global-suppressions.mjs. The correct spelling "suppression" is consistently used throughout the rest of the codebase, including in other SendGrid components, API endpoints, and documentation.Here are the specific locations that need to be fixed:
- Line 28:
numberOfSupressionsproperty name- Line 45:
numberOfSupressionsin constraints- Line 54:
numberOfSupressionsin if condition- Line 54:
constraints.numberOfSupressions- Line 67:
numberOfSupressionsin validation object- Line 77: Message "Successfully retrieved global supressions"
The suggested fixes in the review comment are correct and should be applied to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-29: Fix spelling errors in variable names and messagesThere are consistent spelling errors that should be corrected:
- "numberOfSupressions" should be "numberOfSuppressions"
- "supressions" should be "suppressions" in the success message
These spelling errors affect the API contract and should be fixed consistently. Here's the suggested fix:
- numberOfSupressions: { + numberOfSuppressions: { type: "integer", - label: "Max # of Global Supressions to Return", + label: "Max # of Global Suppressions to Return", description: "Indicates the max number of global suppressions to return", optional: true, default: 20, }, if (this.numberOfSupressions) { - constraints.numberOfSupressions = this.getIntegerGtZeroConstraint(); + constraints.numberOfSuppressions = this.getIntegerGtZeroConstraint(); } const validationResult = validate( { startTime: this.startTime, endTime: this.endTime, - numberOfSupressions: this.numberOfSupressions, + numberOfSuppressions: this.numberOfSuppressions, }, constraints, ); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved global supressions"); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved global suppressions");Let's check if these spelling errors exist in other files:
Also applies to: 45-46, 54-54, 67-67, 77-77
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar spelling errors across the codebase rg -i 'supression' --type jsLength of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search including the file content rg -i "supression" -A 2 -B 2 # Also search for the correct spelling to understand the context better rg -i "suppression" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 26286
components/sendgrid/actions/create-send/create-send.mjs (1)
26-31: Use 'datetime' type for 'Send At' propThe
sendAtprop is currently of typestringbut represents a date-time value. Using thedatetimetype provides better validation and a user-friendly date-time picker.Update the prop definition:
sendAt: { - type: "string", + type: "datetime", label: "Send At", description: "...", optional: true, },components/sendgrid/sendgrid.app.mjs (1)
20-20: Remove console.log statement from production codeDebugging statements like
console.logshould be removed to prevent unnecessary logging in production.Apply this diff to remove the debug statement:
- console.log("lists: ", lists);components/sendgrid/actions/get-a-block/get-a-block.mjs (1)
Line range hint
34-36: Add missing await for async operation.The
getBlockcall appears to be asynchronous but is missing theawaitkeyword. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the response promise is not properly resolved.Apply this fix:
- const resp = this.sendgrid.getBlock(this.email); + const resp = await this.sendgrid.getBlock(this.email);components/sendgrid/actions/delete-list/delete-list.mjs (2)
Line range hint
20-26: Consider moving boolean conversion to prop definitionThe boolean conversion in the run method could be handled at the prop level for better encapsulation.
deleteContacts: { propDefinition: [ common.props.sendgrid, "deleteAll", ], label: "Delete Contacts?", description: "Indicates that all contacts on the list are also to be deleted", + type: "boolean", + default: false, },
Line range hint
29-34: Enhance success message with more detailsConsider including whether contacts were also deleted in the success message for better clarity.
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted list ${this.listId}.`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted list ${this.listId}${this.deleteContacts ? " and its contacts" : ""}.`);components/sendgrid/actions/validate-email/validate-email.mjs (2)
Line range hint
28-33: Improve error message for free accountsThe error message could be more helpful by providing guidance on how to upgrade.
const account = await this.sendgrid.getAccountInformation(); if (account.type === "free") { - throw new Error("This action is only eligible for SendGrid Email API Pro and Premier plans."); + throw new Error("This action requires a SendGrid Email API Pro or Premier plan. Please upgrade your account at https://sendgrid.com/pricing to use this feature."); }
Line range hint
34-39: Consider moving validation constraints outside run methodThe email validation constraints could be defined as a class property for better reusability and to avoid recreating the object on each run.
+ static EMAIL_CONSTRAINTS = { + email: { + email: true, + }, + }; + async run({ $ }) { const account = await this.sendgrid.getAccountInformation(); if (account.type === "free") { throw new Error("This action is only eligible for SendGrid Email API Pro and Premier plans."); } - const constraints = { - email: { - email: true, - }, - }; const validationResult = validate( { email: this.email, }, - constraints, + this.constructor.EMAIL_CONSTRAINTS, );components/sendgrid/actions/get-all-bounces/get-all-bounces.mjs (1)
Line range hint
28-42: Simplify constraints object creationThe constraints object creation could be simplified by using object spread and conditional properties.
- const constraints = {}; this.startTime = this.convertEmptyStringToUndefined(this.startTime); - if (this.startTime != null) { - constraints.startTime = this.getIntegerGtZeroConstraint(); - } this.endTime = this.convertEmptyStringToUndefined(this.endTime); - if (this.endTime != null) { - constraints.endTime = { - numericality: { - onlyInteger: true, - greaterThan: this.startTime > 0 - ? this.startTime - : 0, - message: "must be positive integer, non zero, greater than `startTime`", - }, - }; - } + const constraints = { + ...(this.startTime != null && { + startTime: this.getIntegerGtZeroConstraint(), + }), + ...(this.endTime != null && { + endTime: { + numericality: { + onlyInteger: true, + greaterThan: this.startTime > 0 ? this.startTime : 0, + message: `must be a positive integer${this.startTime > 0 ? ` greater than ${this.startTime}` : ""}`, + }, + }, + }), + };components/sendgrid/actions/remove-contact-from-list/remove-contact-from-list.mjs (3)
Line range hint
41-47: Fix SQL injection vulnerability in contact searchThe current implementation is vulnerable to SQL injection attacks through unescaped email input in the search query. An attacker could craft a malicious email address to manipulate the query.
Apply this fix:
- const { result } = await this.sendgrid.searchContacts(`email like '${email}'`); + const escapedEmail = email.replace(/'/g, "''"); + const { result } = await this.sendgrid.searchContacts(`email LIKE '${escapedEmail}'`);
Line range hint
41-50: Add error handling for contact lookup failuresThe code should handle cases where contacts are not found or when the search API fails.
Consider this implementation:
for (const email of contactEmails) { - const { result } = await this.sendgrid.searchContacts(`email like '${email}'`); - const id = result[0]?.id; - if (!contactIds.includes(id)) { - contactIds.push(id); + try { + const { result } = await this.sendgrid.searchContacts(`email LIKE '${email}'`); + const id = result[0]?.id; + if (!id) { + console.warn(`Contact not found for email: ${email}`); + continue; + } + if (!contactIds.includes(id)) { + contactIds.push(id); + } + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Failed to search for contact with email: ${email}`, error); + throw error; }
Line range hint
51-54: Improve error handling and response validationThe current implementation doesn't validate the response from removeContactFromList or handle potential failures.
Consider this enhancement:
- const resp = await this.sendgrid.removeContactFromList(listId, contactIds); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully removed ${contactIds.length} contact(s) from list.`); - return resp; + if (!contactIds.length) { + $.export("$summary", "No valid contacts found to remove"); + return { + message: "No contacts removed", + removed: 0, + }; + } + try { + const resp = await this.sendgrid.removeContactFromList(listId, contactIds); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully removed ${contactIds.length} contact(s) from list.`); + return resp; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to remove contacts from list", error); + throw error; + }components/sendgrid/actions/delete-contacts/delete-contacts.mjs (1)
Line range hint
38-40: Add confirmation for deleteAllContacts operationThe deleteAllContacts operation is destructive and irreversible. Consider adding a confirmation mechanism.
Add a confirmation property:
+ confirmDeleteAll: { + type: "boolean", + label: "Confirm Delete All", + description: "Please confirm that you want to delete ALL contacts. This action cannot be undone.", + optional: true, + default: false, + conditional: { + path: "deleteAllContacts", + value: true, + }, + },And update the validation:
- if (deleteAllContacts && (contactIds || contactEmails)) { + if (deleteAllContacts) { + if (contactIds || contactEmails) { throw new Error("If `deleteAllContacts` is selected, cannot select `contactIds` or `contactEmails`"); + } + if (!this.confirmDeleteAll) { + throw new Error("Please confirm the delete all operation by setting confirmDeleteAll to true"); + } }components/sendgrid/actions/search-contacts/search-contacts.mjs (2)
Line range hint
63-69: Remove console.log and enhance query validationThe code includes a console.log statement and could benefit from query validation.
Consider this enhancement:
- console.log(q); + if (!q.trim()) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Search query cannot be empty"); + } + + try { const resp = await this.sendgrid.searchContacts(q); $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search"); return resp; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to search contacts", error); + throw error; + }
Line range hint
56-62: Sanitize user input in query constructionThe query construction is vulnerable to SQL injection when using queryValue.
Apply this fix:
} else { + const sanitizedValue = queryValue.replace(/'/g, "''"); q = matchCase === "Fuzzy" - ? `lower(${queryField}) LIKE '%${queryValue}%'` - : `${queryField} = '${queryValue}'`; + ? `lower(${queryField}) LIKE '%${sanitizedValue}%'` + : `${queryField} = '${sanitizedValue}'`; }components/sendgrid/actions/add-or-update-contact/add-or-update-contact.mjs (1)
Line range hint
82-107: Inconsistent validation key namingThe validation constraints use 'cc' as the key when validating
alternateEmails, which is inconsistent with the property name. This could lead to confusion in maintenance.Consider updating the validation to use consistent naming:
if (this.alternateEmails) { - constraints.cc = { + constraints.alternateEmails = { type: "array", }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
components/sendgrid/actions/add-email-to-global-suppression/add-email-to-global-suppression.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/add-or-update-contact/add-or-update-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/create-contact-list/create-contact-list.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/create-send/create-send.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/delete-blocks/delete-blocks.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/delete-bounces/delete-bounces.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/delete-contacts/delete-contacts.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/delete-global-suppression/delete-global-suppression.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/delete-list/delete-list.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/get-a-block/get-a-block.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/get-a-global-suppression/get-a-global-suppression.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/get-all-bounces/get-all-bounces.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/get-contact-lists/get-contact-lists.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/list-blocks/list-blocks.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/list-global-suppressions/list-global-suppressions.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/remove-contact-from-list/remove-contact-from-list.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/search-contacts/search-contacts.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/send-email-multiple-recipients/send-email-multiple-recipients.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/send-email-single-recipient/send-email-single-recipient.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/actions/validate-email/validate-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/package.json(2 hunks)components/sendgrid/sendgrid.app.mjs(4 hunks)components/sendgrid/sources/events/events.mjs(1 hunks)components/sendgrid/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- components/sendgrid/common/constants.mjs
- components/sendgrid/sources/events/events.mjs
- components/sendgrid/actions/create-contact-list/create-contact-list.mjs
- components/sendgrid/actions/delete-global-suppression/delete-global-suppression.mjs
- components/sendgrid/actions/send-email-multiple-recipients/send-email-multiple-recipients.mjs
- components/sendgrid/actions/add-email-to-global-suppression/add-email-to-global-suppression.mjs
- components/sendgrid/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs
- components/sendgrid/actions/send-email-single-recipient/send-email-single-recipient.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (19)
components/sendgrid/actions/list-blocks/list-blocks.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version bump follows semantic versioning
The version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 aligns with the changes across other SendGrid components.
components/sendgrid/actions/get-a-global-suppression/get-a-global-suppression.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version update is consistent with other SendGrid components
The version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 aligns with the coordinated update across SendGrid action components.
components/sendgrid/actions/list-global-suppressions/list-global-suppressions.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version update is consistent with other SendGrid components
The version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 aligns with the coordinated update across SendGrid action components.
components/sendgrid/actions/create-send/create-send.mjs (1)
132-135: Add validation for 'listIds' or 'segmentIds' when 'All' is false
When All is set to false, either List Ids or Segment Ids should be provided. Currently, there is no validation enforcing this.
Consider adding a validation check before making the API call. Here's a suggested addition:
if (!this.all && !this.listIds && !this.segmentIds) {
throw new ConfigurationError("When 'All' is false, you must provide 'List Ids' or 'Segment Ids'.");
}components/sendgrid/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: Function 'parseObject' looks good
The parseObject function is well-implemented, handling different input types and parsing JSON strings safely.
components/sendgrid/package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump is appropriate
The version has been updated to "0.4.0", which is suitable given the addition of new features.
13-13: Update dependency version for '@pipedream/platform'
The dependency for @pipedream/platform has been updated from ^1.2.0 to ^3.0.3. Ensure that this version upgrade is compatible with the rest of the codebase.
components/sendgrid/actions/get-contact-lists/get-contact-lists.mjs (2)
8-8: Version update reflects changes
The version number has been updated to "0.0.4", which is appropriate for the addition of new props.
Line range hint 11-16: 'numberOfLists' prop added successfully
The numberOfLists prop allows users to specify the maximum number of contact lists to return, enhancing the action's flexibility.
components/sendgrid/actions/delete-blocks/delete-blocks.mjs (2)
8-8: LGTM: Version update is consistent.
The version increment to "0.0.4" aligns with other SendGrid action components in this PR.
Line range hint 26-36: LGTM: Robust error handling implementation.
The implementation correctly enforces mutual exclusivity between deleteAll and emails parameters, preventing potential conflicts in the API call. The error message is clear and descriptive.
components/sendgrid/actions/get-a-block/get-a-block.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version update is consistent.
The version increment to "0.0.4" aligns with other SendGrid action components in this PR.
components/sendgrid/actions/delete-bounces/delete-bounces.mjs (2)
8-8: LGTM: Version update is consistent.
The version increment to "0.0.4" aligns with other SendGrid action components in this PR.
Line range hint 26-36: LGTM: Implementation follows established patterns.
The error handling and async implementation match the patterns used in other SendGrid actions, maintaining consistency across the codebase. The mutual exclusivity check between deleteAll and emails parameters is properly implemented.
components/sendgrid/actions/delete-list/delete-list.mjs (1)
8-8: LGTM: Version bump
Version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 is appropriate for adding new functionality.
components/sendgrid/actions/validate-email/validate-email.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version bump
Version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 is appropriate for adding new functionality.
components/sendgrid/actions/get-all-bounces/get-all-bounces.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version bump
Version increment from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 is appropriate for the validation enhancements.
components/sendgrid/actions/add-or-update-contact/add-or-update-contact.mjs (2)
Line range hint 108-146: LGTM! The contact creation implementation looks solid
The implementation correctly:
- Validates input data
- Constructs the contact object with all necessary fields
- Handles empty values appropriately
- Provides clear success feedback
9-9: Version bump may need reconsideration
The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 suggests a patch update, but the AI summary indicates broader changes across SendGrid components. Consider if this should be a minor version bump (0.1.0) instead, following semantic versioning principles.
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created contact ${this.name}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect summary message: Should reference "Single Send" instead of "contact"
The success message references "contact" instead of "Single Send", which may confuse users.
Update the summary message to correctly reference "Single Send":
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully created contact ${this.name}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Single Send "${this.name}"`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created contact ${this.name}`); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Single Send "${this.name}"`); |
| }, | ||
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| if (!this.suppressionGroupId && !this.customUnsubscribeUrl) { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either `Suppression Goup Id` or the `Custom Unsubscribe URL`."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in error message: "Goup" should be "Group"
There's a typo in the error message. "Suppression Goup Id" should be corrected to "Suppression Group Id".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either `Suppression Goup Id` or the `Custom Unsubscribe URL`.");
+ throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either `Suppression Group Id` or the `Custom Unsubscribe URL`.");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either `Suppression Goup Id` or the `Custom Unsubscribe URL`."); | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either `Suppression Group Id` or the `Custom Unsubscribe URL`."); |
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| name: this.name, | ||
| categories: parseObject(this.categories), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undefined property 'categories' in data payload
The categories property is being referenced in the data payload, but there is no corresponding categories prop defined. There is a categoryIds prop, which might be intended here.
Update the data payload to use categoryIds:
- categories: parseObject(this.categories),
+ categories: parseObject(this.categoryIds),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| categories: parseObject(this.categories), | |
| categories: parseObject(this.categoryIds), |
| const errors = e.split("Unexpected error (status code: ERR_BAD_REQUEST):")[1]; | ||
| const errorJson = JSON.parse(errors); | ||
|
|
||
| throw new ConfigurationError(errorJson.data.errors[0].message); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improper error handling in the catch block
The error handling assumes that the error e is a string and attempts to split and parse it, which may not work as expected since e is typically an Error object.
Consider refactoring the error handling to properly access the error response. Here's a suggested fix:
} catch (e) {
- const errors = e.split("Unexpected error (status code: ERR_BAD_REQUEST):")[1];
- const errorJson = JSON.parse(errors);
-
- throw new ConfigurationError(errorJson.data.errors[0].message);
+ const errorMessage = e.response?.data?.errors?.[0]?.message || e.message;
+ throw new ConfigurationError(errorMessage);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const errors = e.split("Unexpected error (status code: ERR_BAD_REQUEST):")[1]; | |
| const errorJson = JSON.parse(errors); | |
| throw new ConfigurationError(errorJson.data.errors[0].message); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| // ... previous try block code ... | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| const errorMessage = e.response?.data?.errors?.[0]?.message || e.message; | |
| throw new ConfigurationError(errorMessage); | |
| } |
components/sendgrid/sendgrid.app.mjs
Outdated
| getAllSegments(opts = {}) { | ||
| const baseUrl = this._apiUrl(); | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| headers: this._makeRequestHeader(), | ||
| url: `${baseUrl}/marketing/segments/2.0`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect API endpoint in 'getAllSegments' method
The API endpoint used (/marketing/segments/2.0) may not be correct. According to SendGrid's API documentation, the correct endpoint is /marketing/segments.
Update the URL to the correct endpoint:
return this._makeRequest({
headers: this._makeRequestHeader(),
- url: `${baseUrl}/marketing/segments/2.0`,
+ url: `${baseUrl}/marketing/segments`,
...opts,
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| getAllSegments(opts = {}) { | |
| const baseUrl = this._apiUrl(); | |
| return this._makeRequest({ | |
| headers: this._makeRequestHeader(), | |
| url: `${baseUrl}/marketing/segments/2.0`, | |
| getAllSegments(opts = {}) { | |
| const baseUrl = this._apiUrl(); | |
| return this._makeRequest({ | |
| headers: this._makeRequestHeader(), | |
| url: `${baseUrl}/marketing/segments`, |
luancazarine
force-pushed
the
13990-action-testmonitor-create-a-new-test-result
branch
from
a28bd95
to
2ab6f2d
Compare
luancazarine
force-pushed
the
13990-action-testmonitor-create-a-new-test-result
branch
from
2ab6f2d
to
e17fdaa
Compare
Resolves #13990
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
These updates improve the functionality and usability of the Test Monitor application and SendGrid integration, allowing for better management of test results and email operations.