More precise testing of plugins #935
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ericwb
force-pushed
the
plugin_unit_tests
branch
2 times, most recently
from
05be4af to
31da3fe
Compare
ericwb
force-pushed
the
plugin_unit_tests
branch
6 times, most recently
from
33cfb3e to
7d15f64
Compare
ericwb
force-pushed
the
plugin_unit_tests
branch
from
181de9c to
1c33807
Compare
Instead of relying on a count of the severity and confidence levels found within an example file, make use of Python's native unit testing to verify the results of a plugin. The existing method of confirming counts can be inaccurate. It's very easy to have a false positive simply because one issue extra was found and one issue was missed, thus giving the same count. It tells nothing of the validation of a particular line of problematic code. Relates to PyCQA#352 Signed-off-by: Eric Brown <[email protected]>
ericwb
force-pushed
the
plugin_unit_tests
branch
from
1c33807 to
8c193a4
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of relying on a count of the severity and confidence
levels found within an example file, make use of Python's native
unit testing to verify the results of a plugin.
The existing method of confirming counts can be inaccurate. It's
very easy to have a false positive simply because one issue extra
was found and one issue was missed, thus giving the same count. It
tells nothing of the validation of a particular line of problematic
code.
Relates to #352
Signed-off-by: Eric Brown [email protected]