ppx_sexp_conv
is a PPX syntax extension that generates code for
converting OCaml types to and from s-expressions, as defined in the
=sexplib= library. S-expressions are defined by the following type:
type sexp = Atom of string | List of sexp list
and are rendered as parenthesized lists of strings, e.g. (This (is
an) (s expression))
.
ppx_sexp_conv
fits into the =ppx_deriving= framework, so you can
invoke it the same way you invoke any other deriving plug-in. Thus,
we can write
type int_pair = (int * int) [@@deriving sexp]
to get two values defined automatically, sexp_of_int_pair
and
int_pair_of_sexp
. If we only want one direction, we can write one
of the following.
type int_pair = (int * int) [@@deriving sexp_of]
type int_pair = (int * int) [@@deriving of_sexp]
These sexp-converters depend on having a set of converters for basic
values (e.g., int_of_sexp
) already in scope. This can be done by
writing:
open Sexplib.Std
If you’re using =Core= or =Core_kernel=, you can get the same effect with
open Core.Std
or open Core_kernel.Std
.
It’s also possible to construct converters based on type expressions, i.e.:
[%sexp_of: (int * string) list] [1,"one"; 2,"two"]
|> Sexp.to_string;;
=> "((1 one) (2 two))"
[%sexp_of: (int * string) list] [1,"one"; 2,"two"]
|> [%of_sexp: (int * string) list];;
=> [1,"one"; 2,"two"]
For %sexp_of
, we can also omit the conversion of some types by
putting underscores for that type name.
[%sexp_of: (int * _) list] [1,"one"; 2,"two"]
|> Sexp.to_string;;
=> "((1 _)(2 _))"
In the following, we’ll review the serialization rules for different OCaml types.
Basic types are represented as atoms. For numbers like int
,
int32
, int64
, float
, the string in the atom is what is accepted
the standard ocaml functions int_of_string
, Int32.of_string
, etc.
For the types char
or string
, the string in the atom is
respectively a one character string or the string itself.
OCaml-lists and arrays are represented as s-expression lists.
OCaml tuples are treated as lists of values in the same order as in
the tuple. The type unit
is treated like a 0-tuple. e.g.:
(3.14, "foo", "bar bla", 27) => (3.14 foo "bar bla" 27)
With options, None
is treated as a zero-element list, and Some
is
treated as a singleton list, as shown below.
None => ()
Some value => (value)
We also support reading options following the ordinary rules for variants i.e.:
None => None
Some value => (Some value)
The rules for variants are described below.
Records are represented as lists of lists, where each inner list is a key-value pair. Each pair consists of the name of the record field (first element), and its value (second element). e.g.:
{ foo = (3,4);
bar = "some string"; }
=> ((foo (3 4)) (bar "some string"))
Type specifications of records allow the use of a special type
sexp_option
which indicates that a record field should be
optional. e.g.:
type t =
{ x : int option;
y : int sexp_option;
} with sexp
The type sexp_option
is equivalent to ordinary options, but is
treated specially by the code generator. The following examples show
how this works.
{ x = Some 1; y = Some 2; } => ((x (1)) (y 2))
{ x = None ; y = None; } => ((x ()))
Note that, when present, on optional value is represented as the bare value, rather than explicitly as an option.
The types sexp_list
and sexp_array
can be used in ways similar to
the type sexp_option
. They assume the empty list and empty array
respectively as default values.
More complex default values can be specified explicitly using several constructs, e.g.:
let z_test v = v > 42
type t =
{ x : int [@default 42];
y : int [@default 3] [@sexp_drop_default];
z : int [@default 3] [@sexp_drop_if fun x -> x = 3];
} [@@deriving sexp]
The @default
annotation lets one specify a default value to be
selected if the field is not specified, when converting from an
s-expression. The @sexp_drop_default
annotation implies that the
field will be dropped when generating the s-expression if the value
being serialized is equal to the default according to polymorphic
equality. Finally, @sexp_drop_if
is like @sexp_drop_default
,
except that it lets you specify the condition under which the field is
dropped.
Constant constructors in variants are represented as strings. Constructors with arguments are represented as lists, the first element being the constructor name, the rest being its arguments. Constructors may also be started in lowercase in S-expressions, but will always be converted to uppercase when converting from OCaml values.
For example:
type t = A | B of int * float * t with sexp
B (42, 3.14, B (-1, 2.72, A)) => (B 42 3.14 (B -1 2.72 A))
The above example also demonstrates recursion in data structures.
Polymorphic variants behave almost the same as ordinary variants. The notable difference is that polymorphic variant constructors must always start with an either lower- or uppercase character, matching the way it was specified in the type definition. This is because OCaml distinguishes between upper and lowercase variant constructors. Note that type specifications containing unions of variant types are also supported by the S-expression converter, for example as in:
type ab = [ `A | `B ] [@@deriving sexp]
type cd = [ `C | `D ] [@@deriving sexp]
type abcd = [ ab | cd ] [@@deriving sexp]
There is nothing special about polymorphic values as long as there are conversion functions for the type parameters. e.g.:
type 'a t = A | B of 'a [@@deriving sexp]
type foo = int t [@@deriving sexp]
In the above case the conversion functions will behave as if foo
had
been defined as a monomorphic version of t
with 'a
replaced by
int
on the right hand side.
If a data structure is indeed polymorphic and you want to convert it,
you will have to supply the conversion functions for the type
parameters at runtime. If you wanted to convert a value of type 'a
t
as in the above example, you would have to write something like
this:
sexp_of_t sexp_of_a v
where sexp_of_a
, which may also be named differently in this
particular case, is a function that converts values of type 'a
to an
S-expression. Types with more than one parameter require passing
conversion functions for those parameters in the order of their
appearance on the left hand side of the type definition.
Opaque values are ones for which we do not want to perform
conversions. This may be, because we do not have S-expression
converters for them, or because we do not want to apply them in a
particular type context. e.g. to hide large, unimportant parts of
configurations. To prevent the preprocessor from generating calls to
converters, simply apply the qualifier sexp_opaque
as if it were a
type constructor, e.g.:
type foo = int * stuff sexp_opaque [@@deriving sexp]
Thus, there is no need to specify converters for type stuff
, and if
there are any, they will not be used in this particular context.
Needless to say, it is not possible to convert such an S-expression
back to the original value. Here is an example conversion:
(42, some_stuff) => (42 <opaque>)
S-expression converters for exceptions can be automatically registered.
module M = struct
exception Foo of int [@@deriving sexp]
end
Such exceptions will be translated in a similar way as sum types, but
their constructor will be prefixed with the fully qualified module
path (here: M.Foo
) so as to be able to discriminate between them
without problems.
The user can then easily convert an exception matching the above one
to an S-expression using sexp_of_exn
. User-defined conversion
functions can be registered, too, by calling add_exn_converter
.
This should make it very convenient for users to catch arbitrary
exceptions escaping their program and pretty-printing them, including
all arguments, as S-expressions. The library already contains
mappings for all known exceptions that can escape functions in the
OCaml standard library.
The Stdlib’s Hash tables, which are abstract values in OCaml, are represented as association lists, i.e. lists of key-value pairs, e.g.:
((foo 42) (bar 3))
Reading in the above S-expression as hash table mapping strings to
integers ((string, int) Hashtbl.t
) will map foo
to 42
and bar
to 3
.
Note that the order of elements in the list may matter, because the OCaml-implementation of hash tables keeps duplicates. Bindings will be inserted into the hash table in the order of appearance. Therefore, the last binding of a key will be the “visible” one, the others are “hidden”. See the OCaml documentation on hash tables for details.