Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding a split_workload algorithm #10271

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

meg-1
Copy link
Contributor

@meg-1 meg-1 commented Oct 11, 2023

Describe your change:

This algorithm is a brute-force search over (nearly) all 2^n possible partitions and was created for educational purposes. The asymptotic runtime of this code is: O(n * 2^n) this is a case of the partition problem. It accepts a multiset ( list ) of integers, distributes them, and returns a tuple, containing two lists, with minimal difference between their sums.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

Sorry, something went wrong.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 11, 2023
@meg-1
Copy link
Contributor Author

meg-1 commented Apr 11, 2024

@cclauss, was wondering if you could check this pr out? would be very appreciated! all checks pass, all that's needed is an approving review :))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant