memcg: fix use_hierarchy css_is_ancestor oops regression

If use_hierarchy is set, reclaim testing soon oopses in css_is_ancestor()
called from __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree() called from page_referenced():
when processes are exiting, it's easy for mm_match_cgroup() to pass along
a NULL memcg coming from a NULL mm->owner.

Check for that in __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree().  Return true or false?
False because we cannot know if it was in the hierarchy, but also false
because it's better not to count a reference from an exiting process.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

mm/memcontrol.c

@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ bool __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
 {
 	if (root_memcg == memcg)
 		return true;
-	if (!root_memcg->use_hierarchy)
+	if (!root_memcg->use_hierarchy || !memcg)
 		return false;
 	return css_is_ancestor(&memcg->css, &root_memcg->css);
 }