bpf: do not use reciprocal divide

At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide
were not correct. (off by one in some cases)
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c

He could also show this with BPF:
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c

The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough,
lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with
current cpus.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <[email protected]>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Evans <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c

@@ -641,10 +641,10 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 			emit(ARM_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_X), ctx);
 			break;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
-			/* current k == reciprocal_value(userspace k) */
+			if (k == 1)
+				break;
 			emit_mov_i(r_scratch, k, ctx);
-			/* A = top 32 bits of the product */
-			emit(ARM_UMULL(r_scratch, r_A, r_A, r_scratch), ctx);
+			emit_udiv(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx);
 			break;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X:
 			update_on_xread(ctx);

arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

@@ -223,10 +223,11 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
 			}
 			PPC_DIVWU(r_A, r_A, r_X);
 			break;
-		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K); */
+		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
+			if (K == 1)
+				break;
 			PPC_LI32(r_scratch1, K);
-			/* Top 32 bits of 64bit result -> A */
-			PPC_MULHWU(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+			PPC_DIVWU(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
 			break;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X:
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;

arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

@@ -371,11 +371,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct sock_filter *filter,
 		/* dr %r4,%r12 */
 		EMIT2(0x1d4c);
 		break;
-	case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K) */
-		/* m %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
-		EMIT4_DISP(0x5c40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
-		/* lr %r5,%r4 */
-		EMIT2(0x1854);
+	case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
+		if (K == 1)
+			break;
+		/* lhi %r4,0 */
+		EMIT4(0xa7480000);
+		/* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
+		EMIT4_DISP(0x5d40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
 		break;
 	case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X */
 		jit->seen |= SEEN_XREG | SEEN_RET0;
@@ -391,6 +393,11 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct sock_filter *filter,
 		EMIT2(0x1854);
 		break;
 	case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K */
+		if (K == 1) {
+			/* lhi %r5,0 */
+			EMIT4(0xa7580000);
+			break;
+		}
 		/* lhi %r4,0 */
 		EMIT4(0xa7480000);
 		/* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */

arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

@@ -497,9 +497,20 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
 			case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K:	/* A *= K */
 				emit_alu_K(MUL, K);
 				break;
-			case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:	/* A /= K */
-				emit_alu_K(MUL, K);
-				emit_read_y(r_A);
+			case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:	/* A /= K with K != 0*/
+				if (K == 1)
+					break;
+				emit_write_y(G0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC32
+				/* The Sparc v8 architecture requires
+				 * three instructions between a %y
+				 * register write and the first use.
+				 */
+				emit_nop();
+				emit_nop();
+				emit_nop();
+#endif
+				emit_alu_K(DIV, K);
 				break;
 			case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X:	/* A /= X; */
 				emit_cmpi(r_X, 0);

arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

@@ -359,15 +359,21 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
 				EMIT2(0x89, 0xd0);	/* mov %edx,%eax */
 				break;
 			case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
+				if (K == 1) {
+					CLEAR_A();
+					break;
+				}
 				EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);	/* xor %edx,%edx */
 				EMIT1(0xb9);EMIT(K, 4);	/* mov imm32,%ecx */
 				EMIT2(0xf7, 0xf1);	/* div %ecx */
 				EMIT2(0x89, 0xd0);	/* mov %edx,%eax */
 				break;
-			case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K); */
-				EMIT3(0x48, 0x69, 0xc0); /* imul imm32,%rax,%rax */
-				EMIT(K, 4);
-				EMIT4(0x48, 0xc1, 0xe8, 0x20); /* shr $0x20,%rax */
+			case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
+				if (K == 1)
+					break;
+				EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);	/* xor %edx,%edx */
+				EMIT1(0xb9);EMIT(K, 4);	/* mov imm32,%ecx */
+				EMIT2(0xf7, 0xf1);	/* div %ecx */
 				break;
 			case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X:
 				seen |= SEEN_XREG;

net/core/filter.c

@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
-#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
 #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <linux/seccomp.h>
 #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
@@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ unsigned int sk_run_filter(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 			A /= X;
 			continue;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
-			A = reciprocal_divide(A, K);
+			A /= K;
 			continue;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X:
 			if (X == 0)
@@ -553,11 +552,6 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
 		/* Some instructions need special checks */
 		switch (code) {
 		case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
-			/* check for division by zero */
-			if (ftest->k == 0)
-				return -EINVAL;
-			ftest->k = reciprocal_value(ftest->k);
-			break;
 		case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K:
 			/* check for division by zero */
 			if (ftest->k == 0)
@@ -853,27 +847,7 @@ void sk_decode_filter(struct sock_filter *filt, struct sock_filter *to)
 	to->code = decodes[code];
 	to->jt = filt->jt;
 	to->jf = filt->jf;
-
-	if (code == BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K) {
-		/*
-		 * When loaded this rule user gave us X, which was
-		 * translated into R = r(X). Now we calculate the
-		 * RR = r(R) and report it back. If next time this
-		 * value is loaded and RRR = r(RR) is calculated
-		 * then the R == RRR will be true.
-		 *
-		 * One exception. X == 1 translates into R == 0 and
-		 * we can't calculate RR out of it with r().
-		 */
-
-		if (filt->k == 0)
-			to->k = 1;
-		else
-			to->k = reciprocal_value(filt->k);
-
-		BUG_ON(reciprocal_value(to->k) != filt->k);
-	} else
-		to->k = filt->k;
+	to->k = filt->k;
 }
 
 int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *ubuf, unsigned int len)