Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
block, bfq: do not insert oom queue into position tree
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
BFQ maintains an ordered list, implemented with an RB tree, of
head-request positions of non-empty bfq_queues. This position tree,
inherited from CFQ, is used to find bfq_queues that contain I/O close
to each other. BFQ merges these bfq_queues into a single shared queue,
if this boosts throughput on the device at hand.

There is however a special-purpose bfq_queue that does not participate
in queue merging, the oom bfq_queue. Yet, also this bfq_queue could be
wrongly added to the position tree. So bfqq_find_close() could return
the oom bfq_queue, which is a source of further troubles in an
out-of-memory situation. This commit prevents the oom bfq_queue from
being inserted into the position tree.

Tested-by: Patrick Dung <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Algodev-github authored and axboe committed Feb 3, 2020
1 parent f718b09 commit 32c59e3
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 0 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions block/bfq-iosched.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
bfqq->pos_root = NULL;
}

/* oom_bfqq does not participate in queue merging */
if (bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq)
return;

/*
* bfqq cannot be merged any longer (see comments in
* bfq_setup_cooperator): no point in adding bfqq into the
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 32c59e3

Please sign in to comment.