Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
sched: clear buddies more aggressively
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
It was noticed that a task could get re-elected past its run quota due to buddy
affinities. This could increase latency a little. Cure it by more aggresively
clearing buddy state.

We do so in two situations:
 - when we force preempt
 - when we select a buddy to run

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Mike Galbraith authored and Ingo Molnar committed Feb 1, 2009
1 parent 1596e29 commit a9f3e2b
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 1 deletion.
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion kernel/sched_fair.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -768,8 +768,14 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)

ideal_runtime = sched_slice(cfs_rq, curr);
delta_exec = curr->sum_exec_runtime - curr->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
if (delta_exec > ideal_runtime)
if (delta_exec > ideal_runtime) {
resched_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)->curr);
/*
* The current task ran long enough, ensure it doesn't get
* re-elected due to buddy favours.
*/
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
}
}

static void
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1445,6 +1451,11 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)

do {
se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
/*
* If se was a buddy, clear it so that it will have to earn
* the favour again.
*/
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
cfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se);
} while (cfs_rq);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit a9f3e2b

Please sign in to comment.