dt-bindings: soc: samsung: Fix I2C clocks order in USI binding example

Now that HSI2C binding [1] is converted to dt-schema format, it reveals
incorrect HSI2C clocks order in USI binding example:

    .../exynos-usi.example.dt.yaml:
    i2c@13820000: clock-names:0: 'hsi2c' was expected
    From schema: .../i2c-exynos5.yaml

    .../exynos-usi.example.dt.yaml:
    i2c@13820000: clock-names:1: 'hsi2c_pclk' was expected
    From schema: .../i2c-exynos5.yaml

Change HSI2C clock order in USI binding example to satisfy HSI2C binding
requirements and fix above warnings.

[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml

Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml

@@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ examples:
             interrupts = <GIC_SPI 227 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
             #address-cells = <1>;
             #size-cells = <0>;
-            clocks = <&cmu_peri 32>, <&cmu_peri 31>;
-            clock-names = "hsi2c_pclk", "hsi2c";
+            clocks = <&cmu_peri 31>, <&cmu_peri 32>;
+            clock-names = "hsi2c", "hsi2c_pclk";
             status = "disabled";
         };
     };