Skip to content

Handheld Gamma cameras with coded aperture collimators are under investigation for intraoperative imaging in nuclear medicine, because they offer a high sensitivity and the possibility of 3D imaging. We assessed axial resolution and computational performance for imaging with a high resolution coded aperture mask and a semiconductor pixel detector.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

bigfly-nb/assessment_of_axial_resolution_in_CAI

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

8 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

This is the repository to the article "Assessment of the Axial Resolution of a Compact Gamma Camera With Coded Aperture Collimator".
DOI

Abstract
Purpose: Handheld Gamma cameras with coded aperture collimators are under investigation for intraoperative imaging in nuclear medicine, because they offer a high sensitivity and the possibility of 3D imaging. We assessed axial resolution and computational performance for imaging with a high resolution CA mask and a semiconductor pixel detector.
Methods: To assess the axial resolution an experimental Gamma camera was set up consisting of a Timepix3 detector with a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels and a coded aperture MURA mask of rank 31 with round holes of 0.08 mm in diameter in a 0.11 mm thick Tungsten sheet. A set of measurements was taken where a point-like Gamma source was placed centrally at 21 different positions within the range of 12 to 100 mm. For each source position, the detector image was reconstructed in 0.5 mm steps surrounding the true position, resulting in a stack of images. The axial resolution was assessed by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) profile along the z-axis of the stack. Two different reconstruction methods were compared: MURA Decoding and a 3D maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm (3D-MLEM).
Results: While taking x-times longer in computation, 3D-MLEM yields a smaller axial FWHM and a higher CNR. The axial resolution decreases from 4.7 mm and 1.6 mm at 14 mm to 39.5 mm and 11.6 mm at 100 mm for MURA Decoding and 3D-MLEM respectively.
Conclusion: 3D-MLEM offers a better resolution but is computationally much slower than MURA decoding, whose reconstruction time is compatible with real-time imaging. Further investigations regarding the intraoperative application are required.

About

Handheld Gamma cameras with coded aperture collimators are under investigation for intraoperative imaging in nuclear medicine, because they offer a high sensitivity and the possibility of 3D imaging. We assessed axial resolution and computational performance for imaging with a high resolution coded aperture mask and a semiconductor pixel detector.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published