mm/vmalloc.c: fix an overflow bug in alloc_vmap_area()

When searching a vmap area in the vmalloc space, we use (addr + size -
1) to check if the value is less than addr, which is an overflow.  But
we assign (addr + size) to vmap_area->va_end.

So if we come across the below case:

  (addr + size - 1) : not overflow
  (addr + size)     : overflow

we will assign an overflow value (e.g 0) to vmap_area->va_end, And this
will trigger BUG in __insert_vmap_area, causing system panic.

So using (addr + size) to check the overflow should be the correct
behaviour, not (addr + size - 1).

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

mm/vmalloc.c

@@ -388,12 +388,12 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
 		addr = ALIGN(first->va_end, align);
 		if (addr < vstart)
 			goto nocache;
-		if (addr + size - 1 < addr)
+		if (addr + size < addr)
 			goto overflow;
 
 	} else {
 		addr = ALIGN(vstart, align);
-		if (addr + size - 1 < addr)
+		if (addr + size < addr)
 			goto overflow;
 
 		n = vmap_area_root.rb_node;
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
 		if (addr + cached_hole_size < first->va_start)
 			cached_hole_size = first->va_start - addr;
 		addr = ALIGN(first->va_end, align);
-		if (addr + size - 1 < addr)
+		if (addr + size < addr)
 			goto overflow;
 
 		if (list_is_last(&first->list, &vmap_area_list))