Skip to content

Issues: dotnet/csharpstandard

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
225 Open 289 Closed
225 Open 289 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Nullability: flow analysis with array creation
#1243 by jnm2 was closed Jan 3, 2025
3
Add additional null state analysis examples
#1214 by BillWagner was closed Dec 11, 2024
1
@BillWagner
Document
#1197 by GIgako19929 was closed Dec 11, 2024
Post/pre inc/dec "typically"? type: bug The Standard does not describe the language as intended or implemented type: formatting The Standard has incorrect formatting (or a typo)
#1196 by Nigel-Ecma was closed Nov 14, 2024 C# 8.0
@RexJaeschke
4
Hiding an inherited reserved method signature - No warnings if new keyword is not used
#1194 by logeshkumars0604 was closed Dec 7, 2024
Null forgiving operator grammar issues type: bug The Standard does not describe the language as intended or implemented
#1190 by jskeet was closed Dec 11, 2024 C# 8.0
@Nigel-Ecma
2
Nested class within a static class - static or non-static by implicit?
#1189 by logeshkumars0604 was closed Oct 28, 2024
1
Typ0
#1169 by Playgirlkaybraz11 was closed Sep 9, 2024
2
Minor tweaks to the handling of right-associative operators type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
#1166 by RexJaeschke was closed Sep 5, 2024
@RexJaeschke
10
§15.4 states that constant members can be reference types.
#1165 by praeceptum was closed Aug 29, 2024
3
Auto properties section explains property initializers by linking to array initializers
#1163 by jnm2 was closed Aug 23, 2024
4
Parameters #3: Duplicate normative parameter-kind definitions type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
#1160 by RexJaeschke was closed Oct 2, 2024
@RexJaeschke
1
Parameters #2: Alternate Terms for a Parameter Kind type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
#1159 by RexJaeschke was closed Oct 2, 2024
@RexJaeschke
3
Parameters #1: The use of “formal” in “formal parameter” type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
#1158 by RexJaeschke was closed Oct 2, 2024
@RexJaeschke
3
Add whitespace in C.3 type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
#1151 by jskeet was closed Nov 3, 2024
@jskeet
1
Annex C.2 isn't necessarily correct (in terms of only being things in ISO)
#1146 by jskeet was closed Oct 9, 2024
@RexJaeschke
1
Pre-processing line directive
#1118 by logeshkumars0604 was closed Dec 11, 2024
14 Namespaces section doesn't describe file scoped namespace declarations
#1113 by knutwannheden was closed May 16, 2024
2
Base access in expression body
#1109 by KalleOlaviNiemitalo was closed May 24, 2024
1
1
Unicode escape sequence in identifiers meeting: proposal There is an informal proposal in the issue, worth discussing in a meeting
#1107 by logeshkumars0604 was closed Jun 6, 2024
@RexJaeschke
2
[Nullable Reference Types] Provide informative notes and examples on diagnostics meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
#1094 by BillWagner was closed Nov 20, 2024
1
@BillWagner
2
[Nullable Reference Types] Specify nullable flow analysis lattice meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
#1093 by BillWagner was closed Oct 2, 2024
5
[Nullable Reference Types] Specify behavior for nullable analysis attributes meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
#1092 by BillWagner was closed Nov 20, 2024
1
@BillWagner
2
[Nullable Reference Types] Specify new generic constraints necessary for nullable reference types
#1091 by BillWagner was closed Dec 11, 2024
@BillWagner
1
[Nullable Reference Types] Specify syntax for nullable reference types
#1090 by BillWagner was closed Oct 9, 2024
1
@BillWagner
ProTip! Updated in the last three days: updated:>2025-02-07.