Add a missing 'to'.

input/1_intro.md

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Depending on the context, this may involve achieving one or more of the followin
 - High throughput (rate of processing work)
 - Low utilization of computing resource(s)
 
-There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due batching.
+There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due to batching.
 
 I find that low latency - achieving a short response time - is the most interesting aspect of performance, because it has a strong connection with physical (rather than financial) limitations. It is harder to address latency using financial resources than the other aspects of performance.
 

output/ebook.html

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ <h3>Performance (and latency)</h3>
 <li>High throughput (rate of processing work)</li>
 <li>Low utilization of computing resource(s)</li>
 </ul>
-<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due batching.</p>
+<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due to batching.</p>
 <p>I find that low latency - achieving a short response time - is the most interesting aspect of performance, because it has a strong connection with physical (rather than financial) limitations. It is harder to address latency using financial resources than the other aspects of performance.</p>
 <p>There are a lot of really specific definitions for latency, but I really like the idea that the etymology of the word evokes:</p>
 <dl>

output/intro.html

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ <h3>Performance (and latency)</h3>
 <li>High throughput (rate of processing work)</li>
 <li>Low utilization of computing resource(s)</li>
 </ul>
-<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due batching.</p>
+<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due to batching.</p>
 <p>I find that low latency - achieving a short response time - is the most interesting aspect of performance, because it has a strong connection with physical (rather than financial) limitations. It is harder to address latency using financial resources than the other aspects of performance.</p>
 <p>There are a lot of really specific definitions for latency, but I really like the idea that the etymology of the word evokes:</p>
 <dl>

output/single-page.html

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ <h3>Performance (and latency)</h3>
 <li>High throughput (rate of processing work)</li>
 <li>Low utilization of computing resource(s)</li>
 </ul>
-<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due batching.</p>
+<p>There are tradeoffs involved in optimizing for any of these outcomes. For example, a system may achieve a higher throughput by processing larger batches of work thereby reducing operation overhead. The tradeoff would be longer response times for individual pieces of work due to batching.</p>
 <p>I find that low latency - achieving a short response time - is the most interesting aspect of performance, because it has a strong connection with physical (rather than financial) limitations. It is harder to address latency using financial resources than the other aspects of performance.</p>
 <p>There are a lot of really specific definitions for latency, but I really like the idea that the etymology of the word evokes:</p>
 <dl>