s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function

All references to sev_active() were moved to arch/x86 so we don't need to define it for s390 anymore. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
fracktal · Aug 9, 2019 · 5cbdaee · 5cbdaee
1 parent ae7eb82
commit 5cbdaee
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 1 addition and 7 deletions.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
-extern bool sev_active(void);
 
 int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
 int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
@@ -156,14 +156,9 @@ int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 }
 
 /* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
-bool sev_active(void)
-{
-	return is_prot_virt_guest();
-}
-
 bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
 {
-	return sev_active();
+	return is_prot_virt_guest();
 }
 
 /* protected virtualization */