add file input for proof #113
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (2)
Line range hint
293-320: Consider refactoring duplicate code.The changes made to
e3:publishPlaintextare identical to those ine3:publishCiphertext. To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider refactoring the common logic into a shared function.Here's a suggested refactor:
function handleProofInput(taskArguments: TaskArguments): string { let proof = taskArguments.proof; if (taskArguments.proofFile) { try { const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile); proof = file.toString(); } catch (error) { console.error(`Error reading proof file: ${error.message}`); throw error; } } return proof; } // In both tasks: let proof = handleProofInput(taskArguments); // ... rest of the task logicThis refactoring will make it easier to maintain and update the proof handling logic in the future.
Line range hint
323-325: Fix inconsistent console log message.The console log message mentions "ciphertext" instead of "plaintext" for the
e3:publishPlaintexttask.Update the console log messages:
-console.log("Publishing ciphertext... ", tx.hash); +console.log("Publishing plaintext... ", tx.hash); await tx.wait(); -console.log(`Ciphertext published`); +console.log(`Plaintext published`);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (2)
253-254: LGTM: Added flexibility for proof input.The addition of optional parameters
proofandproofFileprovides users with more flexibility in how they can provide proof data. This is a good improvement to the task's usability.
Line range hint
1-326: Overall assessment: Good additions with room for improvement.The changes to both
e3:publishCiphertextande3:publishPlaintexttasks add valuable flexibility for providing proof data. However, there are several areas where the implementation could be improved:
- Error handling for file operations should be added to increase robustness.
- Validation of proof data should be implemented to prevent potential issues with invalid input.
- The duplicate code in both tasks should be refactored into a shared function to improve maintainability.
- The console log message in the
e3:publishPlaintexttask should be corrected for consistency.Addressing these points will significantly enhance the quality and reliability of the code.
| let proof = taskArguments.proof; | ||
|
|
||
| if (taskArguments.proofFile) { | ||
| const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile); | ||
| proof = file.toString(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const tx = await enclaveContract.publishCiphertextOutput( | ||
| taskArguments.e3Id, | ||
| data, | ||
| taskArguments.proof, | ||
| proof, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding validation for proof data.
There's currently no validation of the proof data before it's passed to the contract. This could potentially lead to issues if invalid data is provided.
Consider adding a validation step:
function validateProof(proof: string): boolean {
// Implement your validation logic here
// Return true if valid, false otherwise
}
// ... existing code ...
if (proof) {
if (!validateProof(proof)) {
throw new Error("Invalid proof data provided");
}
}
const tx = await enclaveContract.publishCiphertextOutput(
taskArguments.e3Id,
data,
proof,
);| if (taskArguments.proofFile) { | ||
| const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile); | ||
| proof = file.toString(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for file operations.
While reading the proof file, it's important to handle potential errors that may occur during file operations.
Consider wrapping the file reading operation in a try-catch block:
if (taskArguments.proofFile) {
- const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile);
- proof = file.toString();
+ try {
+ const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile);
+ proof = file.toString();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Error reading proof file: ${error.message}`);
+ throw error;
+ }
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (taskArguments.proofFile) { | |
| const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile); | |
| proof = file.toString(); | |
| } | |
| if (taskArguments.proofFile) { | |
| try { | |
| const file = fs.readFileSync(taskArguments.proofFile); | |
| proof = file.toString(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error(`Error reading proof file: ${error.message}`); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
e3:publishCiphertextande3:publishPlaintexttasks by making theproofparameter optional.proofFileparameter to allow users to specify a file containing the proof.