cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()

The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea580 ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
huntrar · Feb 22, 2016 · 63af405 · 63af405
1 parent 5bc8ac0
commit 63af405
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2378,7 +2378,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled);
  * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver.
  *
  * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code
- * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first
+ * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first
  * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime).
  *
  */