Fix legalization of SETCC with promoted integer intrinsics

If the input operands to SETCC are promoted, we need to make sure that we
either use the promoted form of both operands (or neither); a mixture is not
allowed. This can happen, for example, if a target has a custom promoted
i1-returning intrinsic (where i1 is not a legal type). In this case, we need to
use the promoted form of both operands.

This change only augments the behavior of the existing logic in the case where
the input types (which may or may not have already been legalized) disagree,
and should not affect existing target code because this case would otherwise
cause an assert in the SETCC operand promotion code.

This will be covered by (essentially all of the) tests for the new PPCCTRLoops
infrastructure.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp

@@ -521,9 +521,20 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_SETCC(SDNode *N) {
   assert(SVT.isVector() == N->getOperand(0).getValueType().isVector() &&
          "Vector compare must return a vector result!");
 
+  SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(0);
+  SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(1);
+  if (LHS.getValueType() != RHS.getValueType()) {
+    if (getTypeAction(LHS.getValueType()) == TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger &&
+        !LHS.getValueType().isVector())
+      LHS = GetPromotedInteger(LHS);
+    if (getTypeAction(RHS.getValueType()) == TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger &&
+        !RHS.getValueType().isVector())
+      RHS = GetPromotedInteger(RHS);
+  }
+
   // Get the SETCC result using the canonical SETCC type.
-  SDValue SetCC = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), dl, SVT, N->getOperand(0),
-                              N->getOperand(1), N->getOperand(2));
+  SDValue SetCC = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), dl, SVT, LHS, RHS,
+                              N->getOperand(2));
 
   assert(NVT.bitsLE(SVT) && "Integer type overpromoted?");
   // Convert to the expected type.