bcache: make the pr_err statement used for ENOENT only in sysfs_attat…

…ch section

The pr_err statement in the code for sysfs_attatch section would run
for various error codes, which maybe confusing.

E.g,

Run the command twice:
   echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
   [the backing dev got attached on the first run]
   echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach

In dmesg, after the command run twice, we can get:
	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be891
               : cache set not found
The first statement in the message was right, but the second was
confusing.

bch_cached_dev_attach has various pr_ statements for various error
codes, except ENOENT.

After the change, rerun above command twice:
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach

In dmesg we only got:
	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
No confusing "cache set not found" message anymore.

And for some not exist SET-UUID:
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be898 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
In dmesg we can get:
	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be898
	               : cache set not found

Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c

@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ STORE(__cached_dev)
 			if (!v)
 				return size;
 		}
-
-		pr_err("Can't attach %s: cache set not found", buf);
+		if (v == -ENOENT)
+			pr_err("Can't attach %s: cache set not found", buf);
 		return v;
 	}