New in version 0.5.0:
Repeatable flags and commands are counted if repeated (a-la ssh
-vvv
). Repeatable options with arguments are accumulated into list.
Isn't it awesome how optparse
and argparse
generate help messages
based on your code?!
Hell no! You know what's awesome? It's when the option parser is generated based on the beautiful help message that you write yourself! This way you don't need to write this stupid repeatable parser-code, and instead can write only the help message--the way you want it.
docopt
helps you create most beautiful command-line interfaces easily:
"""Naval Fate.
Usage:
naval_fate.py ship new <name>...
naval_fate.py ship <name> move <x> <y> [--speed=<kn>]
naval_fate.py ship shoot <x> <y>
naval_fate.py mine (set|remove) <x> <y> [--moored|--drifting]
naval_fate.py -h | --help
naval_fate.py --version
Options:
-h --help Show this screen.
--version Show version.
--speed=<kn> Speed in knots [default: 10].
--moored Moored (anchored) mine.
--drifting Drifting mine.
"""
from docopt import docopt
if __name__ == '__main__':
arguments = docopt(__doc__, version='Naval Fate 2.0')
print(arguments)
Beat that! The option parser is generated based on the docstring above that is
passed to docopt
function. docopt
parses the usage pattern
("Usage: ..."
) and option descriptions (lines starting with dash "-
") and
ensures that the program invocation matches the usage pattern; it parses
options, arguments and commands based on that. The basic idea is that
a good help message has all necessary information in it to make a parser.
Also, PEP 257 recommends putting help message in the module docstrings.
Use pip or easy_install:
pip install docopt
Alternatively, you can just drop docopt.py
file into your project--it is
self-contained. Get source on github.
docopt
is tested with Python 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, 3.2.
from docopt import docopt
arguments = docopt(doc, argv=sys.argv[1:], help=True, version=None)
docopt
takes 1 required and 3 optional arguments:
doc
could be a module docstring (__doc__
) or some other string that contains a help message that will be parsed to create the option parser. The simple rules of how to write such a help message are given in next sections. Here is a quick example of such a string::
"""Usage: my_program.py [-hso FILE] [--quiet | --verbose] [INPUT ...]
-h --help show this
-s --sorted sorted output
-o FILE specify output file [default: ./test.txt]
--quiet print less text
--verbose print more text
"""
-
argv
is an optional argument vector; by default it is the argument vector passed to your program (sys.argv[1:]
). You can supply it with the list of strings (similar tosys.argv
) e.g.['--verbose', '-o', 'hai.txt']
. -
help
, by defaultTrue
, specifies whether the parser should automatically print the help message (supplied asdoc
) and terminate, in case-h
or--help
option is encountered (options should exist in usage pattern, more on that below). If you want to handle-h
or--help
options manually (as other options), sethelp=False
. -
version
, by defaultNone
, is an optional argument that specifies the version of your program. If supplied, then, (assuming--version
option is mentioned in usage pattern) when parser encounters the--version
option, it will print the supplied version and terminate.version
could be any printable object, but most likely a string, e.g."2.1.0rc1"
.
Note, when docopt
is set to automatically handle -h
, --help
and
--version
options, you still need to mention them in usage pattern for
this to work. Also, for your users to know about them.
The return value is just a dictionary with options, arguments and commands, with keys spelled exactly like in a help message (long versions of options are given priority). For example, if you invoke the top example as::
naval_fate.py ship Guardian move 100 150 --speed=15
the return dictionary will be::
{'--drifting': False, 'mine': False,
'--help': False, 'move': True,
'--moored': False, 'new': False,
'--speed': '15', 'remove': False,
'--version': False, 'set': False,
'<name>': ['Guardian'], 'ship': True,
'<x>': '100', 'shoot': False,
'<y>': '150'}
This turns out to be the most straight-forward, unambiguous and readable
format possible. You can instantly see that args['<name>']
is an
argument, args['--speed']
is an option, and args['move']
is a command.
Help message consists of 2 parts:
-
Usage pattern, e.g.::
Usage: my_program.py [-hso FILE] [--quiet | --verbose] [INPUT ...]
-
Option descriptions, e.g.::
-h --help show this -s --sorted sorted output -o FILE specify output file [default: ./test.txt] --quiet print less text --verbose print more text
Their format is described below; other text is ignored.
Usage pattern is a substring of doc
that starts with
usage:
(case-insensitive) and ends with a visibly empty line.
Minimum example::
"""Usage: my_program.py
"""
The first word after usage:
is interpreted as your program's name.
You can specify your program's name several times to signify several
exclusive patterns::
"""Usage: my_program.py FILE
my_program.py COUNT FILE
"""
Each pattern can consist of the following elements:
- , ARGUMENTS. Arguments are specified as either
upper-case words, e.g.
my_program.py CONTENT-PATH
or words surrounded by angular brackets:my_program.py <content-path>
. - --options.
Options are words started with dash (
-
), e.g.--output
,-o
. You can "stack" several of one-letter options, e.g.-oiv
which will be the same as-o -i -v
. The options can have arguments, e.g.--input=FILE
or-i FILE
or even-iFILE
. However it is important that you specify option descriptions if you want for option to have an argument, a default value, or specify synonymous short/long versions of option (see next section on option descriptions). - commands are words that do not follow the described above conventions
of
--options
or<arguments>
orARGUMENTS
, plus two special commands: dash "-
" and double dash "--
" (see below).
Use the following constructs to specify patterns:
- [ ] (brackets) optional elements.
e.g.:
my_program.py [-hvqo FILE]
- ( ) (parens) required elements.
All elements that are not put in [ ] are also required,
e.g.:
my_program.py --path=<path> <file>...
is the same asmy_program.py (--path=<path> <file>...)
. (Note, "required options" might be not a good idea for your users). - | (pipe) mutualy exclusive elements. Group them using ( ) if
one of the mutually exclusive elements is required:
my_program.py (--clockwise | --counter-clockwise) TIME
. Group them using [ ] if none of the mutually-exclusive elements are required:my_program.py [--left | --right]
. - ... (ellipsis) one or more elements. To specify that arbitrary
number of repeating elements could be accepted, use ellipsis (
...
), e.g.my_program.py FILE ...
means one or moreFILE
-s are accepted. If you want to accept zero or more elements, use brackets, e.g.:my_program.py [FILE ...]
. Ellipsis works as a unary operator on the expression to the left. - [options] (case sensitive) shortcut for any options. You can use it if you want to specify that the usage pattern could be provided with any options defined below in the option-descriptions and do not want to enumerate them all in pattern.
- "
[--]
". Double dash "--
" is used by convention to separate positional arguments that can be mistaken for options. In order to support this convention add "[--]
" to you usage patterns. - "
[-]
". Single dash "-
" is used by convention to signify thatstdin
is used instead of a file. To support this add "[-]
" to you usage patterns. "-
" act as a normal command.
If your pattern allows to match argument-less option (a flag) several times:
Usage: my_program.py [-v | -vv | -vvv]
then number of occurences of the option will be counted. I.e. args['-v']
will be 2
if program was invoked as my_program -vv
. Same works for
commands.
If your usage patterns allows to match same-named option with argument or positional argument several times, the matched arguments will be collected into a list:
Usage: my_program.py <file> <file> --path=<path>...
I.e. invoked with my_program.py file1 file2 --path=./here --path=./there
the returned dict will contain args['<file>'] == ['file1', 'file2']
and
args['--path'] == ['./here', './there']
.
Option descriptions consist of a list of options that you put below your usage patterns.
It is necessary to list option descriptions in order to specify:
- synonymous short and long options,
- if an option has an argument,
- if option's argument has a default value.
The rules are as follows:
-
Every line in
doc
that starts with-
or--
(not counting spaces) is treated as an option description, e.g.:Options: --verbose # GOOD -o FILE # GOOD Other: --bad # BAD, line does not start with dash "-"
-
To specify that option has an argument, put a word describing that argument after space (or equals "
=
" sign) as shown below. Follow either or UPPER-CASE convention for options' arguments. You can use comma if you want to separate options. In the example below, both lines are valid, however you are recommended to stick to a single style. :-o FILE --output=FILE # without comma, with "=" sign -i <file>, --input <file> # with comma, wihtout "=" sing
-
Use two spaces to separate options with their informal description.
--verbose More text. # BAD, will be treated as if verbose option had # an argument "More", so use 2 spaces instead -q Quit. # GOOD -o FILE Output file. # GOOD --stdout Use stdout. # GOOD, 2 spaces
-
If you want to set a default value for an option with an argument, put it into the option-description, in form
[default: <my-default-value>]
.--coefficient=K The K coefficient [default: 2.95] --output=FILE Output file [default: test.txt] --directory=DIR Some directory [default: ./]
We have an extensive list of
examples
which cover every aspect of functionality of docopt
. Try them out,
read the source if in doubt.
docopt
does one thing and does it well: it implements your command-line
interface. However it does not validate the input data. On the other hand
there are libraries like
python schema
which make validating data a breeze. Take a look at
validation_example.py
which uses schema to validate data and report an error to the user.
We would love to hear what you think about docopt
on our
issues page.
Contribute, make pull requrests, report bugs, suggest ideas and discuss
docopt
. You can also drop a line directly to [email protected].
We think docopt
is so good, we want to share it beyound the Python
community!
Help develop Ruby port, CoffeeScript port, Lua port, PHP port or create a port for your favorite language! You are encouraged to use the Python version as a reference implementation. A Language-agnostic test suite is bundled with Python implementation.
Porting discussion is on issues page.
docopt
follows semantic versioning. The first
release with stable API will be 1.0 (soon). Until then, you are encouraged
to specify explicitly the version in your dependency tools, e.g.:
pip install docopt==0.5.0
- 0.5.0 Repeated options/commands are counted or accumulated into list.
- 0.4.2 Bugfix release.
- 0.4.0 Option descriptions become optional,
support for "
--
" and "-
" commands. - 0.3.0 Support for (sub)commands like
git remote add
. Introduce[options]
shortcut for any options. Incompatible changes:docopt
returns dictionary. - 0.2.0 Usage pattern matching. Positional arguments parsing based on usage
patterns.
Incompatible changes:
docopt
returns namespace (for arguments), not list. Usage pattern is formalized. - 0.1.0 Initial release. Options-parsing only (based on options description).