Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
nfs: eliminate pointless and confusing do_vfs_lock wrappers
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
jtlayton authored and amschuma-ntap committed Sep 22, 2016
1 parent b60475c commit 75575dd
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 7 additions and 17 deletions.
9 changes: 2 additions & 7 deletions fs/nfs/file.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -710,11 +710,6 @@ do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
goto out;
}

static int do_vfs_lock(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
{
return locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
}

static int
do_unlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -747,7 +742,7 @@ do_unlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
if (!is_local)
status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl);
else
status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl);
status = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
return status;
}

Expand All @@ -772,7 +767,7 @@ do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
if (!is_local)
status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl);
else
status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl);
status = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
if (status < 0)
goto out;

Expand Down
15 changes: 5 additions & 10 deletions fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5600,11 +5600,6 @@ static int nfs4_proc_getlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
return err;
}

static int do_vfs_lock(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl)
{
return locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl);
}

struct nfs4_unlockdata {
struct nfs_locku_args arg;
struct nfs_locku_res res;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5657,7 +5652,7 @@ static void nfs4_locku_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
switch (task->tk_status) {
case 0:
renew_lease(calldata->server, calldata->timestamp);
do_vfs_lock(calldata->lsp->ls_state->inode, &calldata->fl);
locks_lock_inode_wait(calldata->lsp->ls_state->inode, &calldata->fl);
if (nfs4_update_lock_stateid(calldata->lsp,
&calldata->res.stateid))
break;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5765,7 +5760,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_unlck(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
mutex_lock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
/* Exclude nfs4_reclaim_open_stateid() - note nesting! */
down_read(&nfsi->rwsem);
if (do_vfs_lock(inode, request) == -ENOENT) {
if (locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, request) == -ENOENT) {
up_read(&nfsi->rwsem);
mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
goto out;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5906,7 +5901,7 @@ static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
data->timestamp);
if (data->arg.new_lock) {
data->fl.fl_flags &= ~(FL_SLEEP | FL_ACCESS);
if (do_vfs_lock(lsp->ls_state->inode, &data->fl) < 0) {
if (locks_lock_inode_wait(lsp->ls_state->inode, &data->fl) < 0) {
rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
break;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -6148,7 +6143,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
if (status != 0)
goto out;
request->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
status = do_vfs_lock(state->inode, request);
status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request);
if (status < 0)
goto out;
mutex_lock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
Expand All @@ -6157,7 +6152,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
/* Yes: cache locks! */
/* ...but avoid races with delegation recall... */
request->fl_flags = fl_flags & ~FL_SLEEP;
status = do_vfs_lock(state->inode, request);
status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request);
up_read(&nfsi->rwsem);
mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
goto out;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 75575dd

Please sign in to comment.