Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
bpf: arsh is not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The following snippet was throwing an 'unknown opcode cc' warning
in BPF interpreter:

  0: (18) r0 = 0x0
  2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0
  3: (cc) (u32) r0 s>>= (u32) r0
  4: (95) exit

Although a number of JITs do support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X}
generation, not all of them do and interpreter does neither. We can
leave existing ones and implement it later in bpf-next for the
remaining ones, but reject this properly in verifier for the time
being.

Fixes: 17a5267 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
borkmann authored and Alexei Starovoitov committed Jan 10, 2018
1 parent 4095034 commit 7891a87
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 45 additions and 0 deletions.
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions kernel/bpf/verifier.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2493,6 +2493,11 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EINVAL;
}

if (opcode == BPF_ARSH && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
verbose(env, "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU\n");
return -EINVAL;
}

if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH ||
opcode == BPF_ARSH) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32;
Expand Down
40 changes: 40 additions & 0 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -272,6 +272,46 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
"arsh32 on imm",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
},
{
"arsh32 on reg",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5),
BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
},
{
"arsh64 on imm",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"arsh64 on reg",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"no bpf_exit",
.insns = {
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7891a87

Please sign in to comment.