correct a little mistake of ex10_05.cpp

I found a little mistake in this answer.

ch10/ex10_05.cpp

@@ -7,7 +7,13 @@
 //
 //  @Brief  In the call to equal on rosters, what would happen if both rosters
 //  held C-style strings, rather than library strings?
-//  @Answer It's the same as `std::string`
+//  @Answer It's not quite the same as `std::string`
+//  Maybe the function 'equal' return true when you make a comparison between 
+//  two c-style strings containers. Nonetheless, we need to keep in mind that 
+//  when it comes to comparison of c-style strings, we need to use 'strcmp' but 
+//  not simply relational operators, for using relational operators is just 
+//  comparison between the address of two c-style strings but not their values.
+
 
 #include <algorithm>
 #include <iostream>
@@ -16,11 +22,14 @@
 
 int main()
 {
-    std::vector<const char*> roster1{"Mooophy", "pezy", "Queequeg"};
-    std::list<const char*> roster2{"Mooophy", "pezy", "Queequeg", "shbling",
-                                   "evan617"};
+    char c1[10] = "eipi10";
+    char c2[10] = "eipi10";
+    std::vector<char*> roster1{c1};
+    std::list<char*> roster2{c2};
     std::cout << std::equal(roster1.cbegin(), roster1.cend(), roster2.cbegin());
+    return 0;
 }
 
+// clang 3.5.0
 // out
-// 1
+// 0